Fingolimod as a first- or second-line treatment in a mini-series of young Hellenic patients with adolescent-onset multiple sclerosis: focus on immunological data.
Fingolimod
HLA
Multiple sclerosis
Neuroimmunology
Pediatric
Therapeutics
Journal
Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN: 1590-3478
Titre abrégé: Neurol Sci
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 100959175
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
21
08
2021
accepted:
17
09
2021
pubmed:
2
10
2021
medline:
16
3
2022
entrez:
1
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis(POMS) is characterized by a highly active profile, often warranting treatment with high efficacy disease-modulating therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved DMT for the treatment of POMS. Our aim is to present real-world data of seven fingolimod-treated POMS-patients, recruited in a single MS center in Greece. Clinical and imaging/laboratory data from 7 Hellenic patients fulfilling the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG) criteria for POMS diagnosis, who have received fingolimod treatment, were selected. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping was performed with standard low-resolution sequence-specific oligonucleotide techniques. Three patients were treatment-naïve adolescents who received fingolimod as first-line treatment. Two experienced ongoing clinical and radiological disease activity and have been switched to natalizumab. The remaining cases were post-adolescent adults with POMS, where the vast majority experienced total/near-total disease remission. Fingolimod was generally well-tolerated. Two patients with high disease activity carried the HLA-DRB1*03 allele, while five patients were carriers of at least one of the HLA-DRB1*04, HLA-DRB1*13, and HLA-DRB1*14 alleles, which when not combined with HLA-DRB1*03 showed a trend towards a more favorable clinical course. Fingolimod responders showed a trend towards increased CD(16-56) Our preliminary results support that response of POMS patients to fingolimod may be partially dependent on age and previous DMT, with younger and treatment-naïve patients presenting worse outcomes. The role of immunogenetics and immunophenotyping in personalized treatment warrants investigation in larger and more diverse populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Pediatric onset multiple sclerosis(POMS) is characterized by a highly active profile, often warranting treatment with high efficacy disease-modulating therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, is the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved DMT for the treatment of POMS.
OBJECT
OBJECTIVE
Our aim is to present real-world data of seven fingolimod-treated POMS-patients, recruited in a single MS center in Greece.
METHODS
METHODS
Clinical and imaging/laboratory data from 7 Hellenic patients fulfilling the International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group (IPMSSG) criteria for POMS diagnosis, who have received fingolimod treatment, were selected. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotyping was performed with standard low-resolution sequence-specific oligonucleotide techniques.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Three patients were treatment-naïve adolescents who received fingolimod as first-line treatment. Two experienced ongoing clinical and radiological disease activity and have been switched to natalizumab. The remaining cases were post-adolescent adults with POMS, where the vast majority experienced total/near-total disease remission. Fingolimod was generally well-tolerated. Two patients with high disease activity carried the HLA-DRB1*03 allele, while five patients were carriers of at least one of the HLA-DRB1*04, HLA-DRB1*13, and HLA-DRB1*14 alleles, which when not combined with HLA-DRB1*03 showed a trend towards a more favorable clinical course. Fingolimod responders showed a trend towards increased CD(16-56)
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our preliminary results support that response of POMS patients to fingolimod may be partially dependent on age and previous DMT, with younger and treatment-naïve patients presenting worse outcomes. The role of immunogenetics and immunophenotyping in personalized treatment warrants investigation in larger and more diverse populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34596776
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05623-2
pii: 10.1007/s10072-021-05623-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
HLA-DRB1 Chains
0
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Natalizumab
0
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
G926EC510T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2641-2649Informations de copyright
© 2021. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Références
Chitnis T, Glanz B, Jaffin S, Healy B (2009) Demographics of pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis in an MS center population from the Northeastern United States. Mult Scler 15(5):627–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458508101933
doi: 10.1177/1352458508101933
pubmed: 19299440
Harding KE, Liang K, Cossburn MD et al (2013) Long-term outcome of paediatric onset multiple sclerosis: a population based study. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303996
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303996
Otallah S, Banwell B (2018) Pediatric multiple sclerosis: an update. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 18(11):76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-018-0886-7
doi: 10.1007/s11910-018-0886-7
pubmed: 30229541
Chitnis T, Aaen G, Belman A et al (2020) Improved relapse recovery in paediatric compared to adult multiple sclerosis. Brain 143(9):2733–2741. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa199
doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa199
pubmed: 32810215
Chitnis T, Arnold DL, Banwell B et al (2018) Trial of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a in pediatric multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 379(11):1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1800149
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800149
pubmed: 30207920
Arnold DL, Banwell B, Bar-Or A et al (2020) Effect of fingolimod on MRI outcomes in patients with paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: results from the phase 3 PARADIG MS study. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91(5):483–492. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322138
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322138
Deiva K, Huppke P, Banwell B et al (2020) Consistent control of disease activity with fingolimod versus IFN β-1a in paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: further insights from PARADIG MS. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 91(1):58–66. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-321124
doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-321124
pubmed: 31467033
Chitnis T, Tenembaum S, Banwell B et al (2012) Consensus statement: evaluation of new and existing therapeutics for pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18(1):116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458511430704
doi: 10.1177/1352458511430704
pubmed: 22146610
Ghezzi A, Moiola L, Pozzilli C et al (2015) Natalizumab in the pediatric MS population: results of the Italian registry. BMC Neurol 25(15):174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0433-y
doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0433-y
Huppke P, Huppke B, Ellenberger D et al (2019) Therapy of highly active pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 25(1):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517732843
doi: 10.1177/1352458517732843
pubmed: 28933245
International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2, Sawcer S et al (2011) Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 476(7359):214–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10251
doi: 10.1038/nature10251
Gontika M, Skarlis C, Artemiadis A et al (2020) HLA-DRB1 allele impact on pediatric multiple sclerosis in a Hellenic cohort. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 6(1):2055217320908046. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217320908046
doi: 10.1177/2055217320908046
pubmed: 32133149
pmcid: 7040929
Krupp LB, Tardieu M, Amato MP, Banwell B, Chitnis T, Dale RC et al (2013) International Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Study Group criteria for pediatric multiple sclerosis and immune-mediated central nervous system demyelinating disorders: revisions to the 2007 definitions. Mult Scler 19(10):1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513484547
doi: 10.1177/1352458513484547
pubmed: 23572237
Ziemssen T, Albrecht H, Haas J et al (2021) Descriptive analysis of real-world data on fingolimod long-term treatment of young adult RRMS patients. Front Neurol 3(12):637107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.637107
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.637107
Gärtner J, Chitnis T, Ghezzi A et al (2018) Relapse rate and MRI activity in young adult patients with multiple sclerosis: a post hoc analysis of phase 3 fingolimod trials. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin 4(2):2055217318778610. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217318778610
doi: 10.1177/2055217318778610
pubmed: 29854416
pmcid: 5971396
Amidei A, Siciliano G, Pasquali L (2021) Efficacy of fingolimod after switching from interferon β-1a in an adolescent with multiple sclerosis: case report. Neurol Sci 42(Suppl 1):5–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05170-w
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05170-w
pubmed: 33723709
Ferilli MAN, Papetti L, Valeriani M (2021) Fingolimod in pediatric multiple sclerosis: three case reports. Neurol Sci 42(Suppl 1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05076-7
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05076-7
pubmed: 33483884
Immovilli P, Rota E, Morelli N, Guidetti D (2021) Two-year follow-up during fingolimod treatment in a pediatric multiple sclerosis patient still active on first-line treatment. Neurol Sci 42(Suppl 1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05058-9
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05058-9
pubmed: 33469816
Zanetta C, Filippi M, Moiola L (2021) Fingolimod as an effective therapeutic strategy for pediatric relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: two case reports. Neurol Sci 42(Suppl 1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05270-7
doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05270-7
pubmed: 33904006
Capobianco M, Bertolotto A, Malucchi S (2021) Fingolimod as first-line treatment in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: a case report. Neurol Sci 42(Suppl 1):25–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-05027-8
doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-05027-8
pubmed: 33712907
Chitnis T, Banwell B, Krupp L et al (2020) Temporal profile of lymphocyte counts and relationship with infections with fingolimod therapy in paediatric patients with multiple sclerosis: results from the PARADIG MS study. Mult Scler 7:1352458520936934. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458520936934
doi: 10.1177/1352458520936934
Mehling M, Brinkmann V, Antel J et al (2008) FTY720 therapy exerts differential effects on T cell subsets in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 71(16):1261–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000327609.57688.ea
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000327609.57688.ea
pubmed: 18852441
Wu X, Xue T, Wang Z et al (2021) Different doses of fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol 17(12):621856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.621856
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.621856
Cree BAC, Goldman MD, Corboy JR et al (2020) Efficacy and safety of 2 fingolimod doses vs glatiramer acetate for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 78(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2950
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2950
pmcid: 7445630
Longbrake EE, Kantor D, Pawate S et al (2018) Effectiveness of alternative dose fingolimod for multiple sclerosis. Neurol Clin Pract 8(2):102–107. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000434
doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000434
pubmed: 29708225
pmcid: 5914753
Fragoso YD, Spelman T, Boz C et al (2018) Lymphocyte count in peripheral blood is not associated with the level of clinical response to treatment with fingolimod. Mult Scler Relat Disord 19:105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.018
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.11.018
pubmed: 29182993
Boffa G, Bruschi N, Cellerino M et al (2020) Fingolimod and dimethyl-fumarate-derived lymphopenia is not associated with short-term treatment response and risk of infections in a real-life MS population. CNS Drugs 34(4):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-020-00714-8
doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00714-8
pubmed: 32193826
Paolicelli D, Manni A, D’Onghia M et al (2017) Lymphocyte subsets as biomarkers of therapeutic response in fingolimod treated relapsing multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol 15(303):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.12.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2016.12.012
Ghadiri M, Rezk A, Li R et al (2020) Pre-treatment T-cell subsets associate with fingolimod treatment responsiveness in multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep 10(1):356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57114-2
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57114-2
pubmed: 31941953
pmcid: 6962338
Mimpen M, Smolders J, Hupperts R, Damoiseaux J (2020) Natural killer cells in multiple sclerosis: a review. Immunol Lett 222:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2020.02.012
doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2020.02.012
pubmed: 32113900
Moreno-Torres I, González-García C, Marconi M et al (2018) Immunophenotype and transcriptome profile of patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: setting up a model for prediction of response in a 2-year translational study. Front Immunol 25(9):1693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01693
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01693
Johnson TA, Evans BL, Durafourt BA et al (2011) Reduction of the peripheral blood CD56(bright) NK lymphocyte subset in FTY720-treated multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol 187(1):570–9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1003823
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003823
pubmed: 21622858
Anagnostouli MC, Velonakis G, Dalakas MC (2021) Aggressive herpes zoster in young patients with multiple sclerosis under dimethyl fumarate: significance of CD8+ and natural killer cells. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 8(4):e1017. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001017
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001017
pubmed: 34049996
pmcid: 8168045
Gontika MP, Anagnostouli MC (2018) Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and human leukocyte antigens as markers in pediatric and adolescent multiple sclerosis: on diagnosis, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic responses. Mult Scler Int 22(2018):8487471. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8487471
doi: 10.1155/2018/8487471
De Silvestri A, Capittini C, Mallucci G et al (2019) The involvement of HLA class II alleles in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Dis Markers 6(2019):1409069. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1409069
doi: 10.1155/2019/1409069
DeLuca GC, Ramagopalan SV, Herrera BM et al (2007) An extremes of outcome strategy provides evidence that multiple sclerosis severity is determined by alleles at the HLA-DRB1 locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(52):20896–901. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707731105
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707731105
pubmed: 18087043
pmcid: 2409238
Imrell K, Landtblom AM, Hillert J, Masterman T (2006) Multiple sclerosis with and without CSF bands: clinically indistinguishable but immunogenetically distinct. Neurology 67(6):1062–4. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000237343.93389.35
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000237343.93389.35
pubmed: 17000979
Kikuchi S, Fukazawa T, Niino M et al (2003) HLA-related subpopulations of MS in Japanese with and without oligoclonal IgG bands Human leukocyte antigen. Neurology 60(4):647–51. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000048202.09147.9e
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000048202.09147.9e
pubmed: 12601107