Analysis of parental abnormal chromosomal karyotype and subsequent live births in Chinese couples with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Abnormal Karyotype
Abortion, Habitual
/ genetics
Adult
China
Chromosome Aberrations
Chromosomes
/ ultrastructure
Cytogenetic Analysis
Female
Fertilization
Follow-Up Studies
Gene Rearrangement
Heterozygote
Humans
Insemination, Artificial
Karyotyping
Live Birth
Male
Parents
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Retrospective Studies
Tertiary Care Centers
Translocation, Genetic
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 10 2021
13 10 2021
Historique:
received:
22
04
2021
accepted:
01
09
2021
entrez:
14
10
2021
pubmed:
15
10
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities and the impact of parental chromosomal aberration on the pregnancy outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss remains controversial. 3235 RPL couples who experienced two or more miscarriages before 20 weeks were diagnosed in our tertiary referral hospital during 2008-2018 and included in the single-center retrospective cohort study covering a 10-year period. Chromosome aberration was detected in 121 (3.74%) among 3235 RPL couples which included 75 female and 46 male cases at an individual level. 101 cases were structural aberrations including balanced translocations in 46(38.0%) cases, Robertsonian translocations in 13(10.7%) cases, inversions in 42(34.7%) cases and 20(16.5%) cases were numerical aberrations. 121 carriers and 428 non-carriers were followed up for two years, 55 carriers and 229 non-carriers were subsequent pregnant after diagnosis by natural conception or intrauterine insemination. The frequency of carriers to have a health newborn was not significantly different with non-carriers (72.7% vs. 71.2%, adjusted P = 0.968). This study described the majority of carriers were balanced translocations and chromosome aberrations had a limited influence on live birth rate from the present data. The results of the study also remind us that natural conception may be also a good alternative rather than PGD (Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis) which is common in many other reproductive centers for such patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34645840
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-98606-4
pmc: PMC8514512
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20298Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):579-587
pubmed: 29538673
Med Princ Pract. 2015;24 Suppl 1:38-55
pubmed: 25428171
Nat Genet. 2017 Jan;49(1):36-45
pubmed: 27841880
Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;110(6):1089-1100
pubmed: 30396553
Fertil Steril. 1996 Feb;65(2):250-3
pubmed: 8566242
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):446-50
pubmed: 16595225
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jun;40(6):655-662
pubmed: 29276169
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016 Dec;76(6):443-453
pubmed: 27105633
J Hum Genet. 2008;53(7):622-628
pubmed: 18414779
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Jul;37(7):1703-1710
pubmed: 32451813
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):19-26
pubmed: 27793378
Reprod Biomed Online. 2018 Jun;36(6):677-685
pubmed: 29627226
Fertil Steril. 2000 Feb;73(2):300-4
pubmed: 10685533
Hum Reprod. 2006 Apr;21(4):1076-82
pubmed: 16396938
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Aug;78(2):179-90
pubmed: 12360906
Fertil Steril. 2012 Apr;97(4):894-903
pubmed: 22325687
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Aug 03;12:74
pubmed: 25086467
Prenat Diagn. 1999 Jul;19(7):601-3
pubmed: 10419605
Hum Reprod. 2004 Apr;19(4):1013-7
pubmed: 14990541
Hum Reprod Open. 2018 Apr 06;2018(2):hoy004
pubmed: 31486805
Fertil Steril. 2001 Apr;75(4):678-82
pubmed: 11287018
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1668-74
pubmed: 27278003
Hum Reprod. 2011 Apr;26(4):933-40
pubmed: 21266453
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013 Jan;39(1):113-20
pubmed: 22672580
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1102-1111
pubmed: 31679651
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1822(12):1951-9
pubmed: 22796359
BMJ. 2006 Apr 1;332(7544):759-63
pubmed: 16495333
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jan;40(1):109-16
pubmed: 24033546
Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):6-15
pubmed: 27233760
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Dec;81(2):171-6
pubmed: 9989862
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Mar;36(3):499-507
pubmed: 30470960
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;295(2):511-518
pubmed: 28004193
BMC Med. 2013 Jun 26;11:154
pubmed: 23803387
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;42(1):117-34
pubmed: 25681844
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015 Feb 06;5(3):a023119
pubmed: 25659378
Fertil Steril. 2004 May;81(5):1296-301
pubmed: 15136093
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Apr;1127:27-30
pubmed: 18443326