An Improved Codon Modeling Approach for Accurate Estimation of the Mutation Bias.
codon models
mutation–selection models
nucleotide bias
phylogenetics
Journal
Molecular biology and evolution
ISSN: 1537-1719
Titre abrégé: Mol Biol Evol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 02 2022
03 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
13
1
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
entrez:
12
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Phylogenetic codon models are routinely used to characterize selective regimes in coding sequences. Their parametric design, however, is still a matter of debate, in particular concerning the question of how to account for differing nucleotide frequencies and substitution rates. This problem relates to the fact that nucleotide composition in protein-coding sequences is the result of the interactions between mutation and selection. In particular, because of the structure of the genetic code, the nucleotide composition differs between the three coding positions, with the third position showing a more extreme composition. Yet, phylogenetic codon models do not correctly capture this phenomenon and instead predict that the nucleotide composition should be the same for all three positions. Alternatively, some models allow for different nucleotide rates at the three positions, an approach conflating the effects of mutation and selection on nucleotide composition. In practice, it results in inaccurate estimation of the strength of selection. Conceptually, the problem comes from the fact that phylogenetic codon models do not correctly capture the fixation bias acting against the mutational pressure at the mutation-selection equilibrium. To address this problem and to more accurately identify mutation rates and selection strength, we present an improved codon modeling approach where the fixation rate is not seen as a scalar, but as a tensor. This approach gives an accurate representation of how mutation and selection oppose each other at equilibrium and yields a reliable estimate of the mutational process, while disentangling the mean fixation probabilities prevailing in different mutational directions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35021218
pii: 6503505
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msac005
pmc: PMC8831783
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Codon
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.
Références
Genetics. 1998 Mar;148(3):929-36
pubmed: 9539414
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Nov;17(11):1581-8
pubmed: 11070046
Syst Biol. 2005 Oct;54(5):808-18
pubmed: 16243764
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2375-85
pubmed: 16107593
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jul;24(7):1464-79
pubmed: 17400572
J Mol Evol. 1995 Jan;40(1):56-63
pubmed: 7714912
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1107-18
pubmed: 15689528
Nat Rev Genet. 2015 Jul;16(7):409-20
pubmed: 26055156
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 27;365(1552):2571-80
pubmed: 20643747
Bioinformatics. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):676-9
pubmed: 15509596
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jul;21(7):1201-13
pubmed: 15014159
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):725-36
pubmed: 7968486
Syst Biol. 2004 Oct;53(5):793-808
pubmed: 15545256
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):372-9
pubmed: 16237204
Q Rev Biol. 2014 Sep;89(3):225-52
pubmed: 25195318
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):729-44
pubmed: 20926596
Genetics. 2008 Nov;180(3):1579-91
pubmed: 18791235
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jan;34(1):204-214
pubmed: 27744408
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 9;107(10):4629-34
pubmed: 20176949
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 21;5(7):e11587
pubmed: 20657773
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Mar 9;38(3):1199-1208
pubmed: 33045094
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1910:373-397
pubmed: 31278671
Biol Direct. 2017 Jan 17;12(1):1
pubmed: 28095902
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):295-299
pubmed: 31504749
Elife. 2016 May 17;5:
pubmed: 27187613
Genes (Basel). 2018 Aug 13;9(8):
pubmed: 30104502
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Mar 1;35(3):734-742
pubmed: 29220511
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 May;32(5):1365-71
pubmed: 25701167
PLoS Genet. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001342
pubmed: 21436896
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Dec;15(12):1600-11
pubmed: 9866196
Trends Genet. 2009 Jan;25(1):1-5
pubmed: 19027980
Syst Biol. 2013 Jul;62(4):611-5
pubmed: 23564032
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Feb 1;34(2):391-407
pubmed: 28110273
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Nov;28(11):3033-43
pubmed: 21670087
Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Dec 19;7(1):240-50
pubmed: 25527834
Genetics. 2012 Mar;190(3):1101-15
pubmed: 22209901
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Oct;31(10):2753-69
pubmed: 25063439
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jun;33(6):1517-27
pubmed: 26944704
Biol Lett. 2015 Apr;11(4):20141031
pubmed: 25854546
Genome Biol. 2019 Jan 7;20(1):5
pubmed: 30616647
Science. 1974 Sep 6;185(4154):862-4
pubmed: 4843792
Protein Sci. 2016 Jul;25(7):1354-62
pubmed: 27028523
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(7):e1002764
pubmed: 22807683
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Apr;32(4):1097-108
pubmed: 25576365
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Apr 1;36(4):861-862
pubmed: 30698751
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2472-9
pubmed: 16107592
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13390-5
pubmed: 17679693
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9541-6
pubmed: 15980155
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 30;5(7):e11230
pubmed: 20689581
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jul;15(7):910-7
pubmed: 9656490
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):715-24
pubmed: 7968485