Doing Genetic and Genomic Biology Using the Legume Information System and Associated Resources.
CoNekT
Comparative genomics
Days to flower
GWAS
Gene families
Genome context viewer
InterMine
Legume information system
Pan-genome
ZZBrowse
Journal
Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
ISSN: 1940-6029
Titre abrégé: Methods Mol Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9214969
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
entrez:
17
1
2022
pubmed:
18
1
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In this chapter, we introduce the main components of the Legume Information System ( https://legumeinfo.org ) and several associated resources. Additionally, we provide an example of their use by exploring a biological question: is there a common molecular basis, across legume species, that underlies the photoperiod-mediated transition from vegetative to reproductive development, that is, days to flowering? The Legume Information System (LIS) holds genetic and genomic data for a large number of crop and model legumes and provides a set of online bioinformatic tools designed to help biologists address questions and tasks related to legume biology. Such tasks include identifying the molecular basis of agronomic traits; identifying orthologs/syntelogs for known genes; determining gene expression patterns; accessing genomic datasets; identifying markers for breeding work; and identifying genetic similarities and differences among selected accessions. LIS integrates with other legume-focused informatics resources such as SoyBase ( https://soybase.org ), PeanutBase ( https://peanutbase.org ), and projects of the Legume Federation ( https://legumefederation.org ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35037201
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2067-0_4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
81-100Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Gonzales MD, Archuleta E, Farmer A, Gajendran K, Grant D, Shoemaker R, Beavis WD, Waugh ME (2005) The Legume Information System (LIS): an integrated information resource for comparative legume biology. Nucleic Acids Res 33(Database Issue):D660–D665. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki128
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki128
pubmed: 15608283
Dash S, Campbell JD, Cannon EK, Cleary AM, Huang W, Kalberer SR, Karingula V, Rice AG, Singh J, Umale PE, Weeks NT, Wilkey AP, Farmer AD, Cannon SB (2016) Legume information system (LegumeInfo.org): a key component of a set of federated data resources for the legume family. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D1181–D1188. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1159
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1159
pubmed: 26546515
Sanderson LA, Ficklin SP, Cheng CH, Jung S, Feltus FA, Bett KE, Main D (2013) Tripal v1.1: a standards-based toolkit for construction of online genetic and genomic databases. Database 2013:bat075. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bat075
doi: 10.1093/database/bat075
pubmed: 24163125
pmcid: 3808541
Spoor S, Cheng CH, Sanderson LA, Condon B, Almsaeed A, Chen M, Bretaudeau A, Rasche H, Jung S, Main D, Bett K, Staton M, Wegrzyn JL, Feltus FA, Ficklin SP (2019) Tripal v3: an ontology-based toolkit for construction of FAIR biological community databases. Database 2019:baz077. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baz077
doi: 10.1093/database/baz077
pubmed: 31328773
pmcid: 6643302
Mungall CJ, Emmert DB, FlyBase C (2007) A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information. Bioinformatics 23(13):i337–i346. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm189
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm189
pubmed: 17646315
Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Kaller M (2016) MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32(19):3047–3048. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
pubmed: 5039924
pmcid: 5039924
Cleary A, Farmer A (2018) Genome Context Viewer: visual exploration of multiple annotated genomes using microsynteny. Bioinformatics 34(9):1562–1564. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx757
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx757
pubmed: 29194466
Haas BJ, Delcher AL, Wortman JR, Salzberg SL (2004) DAGchainer: a tool for mining segmental genome duplications and synteny. Bioinformatics 20(18):3643–3646. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth397
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth397
pubmed: 15247098
Koenen EJM, Ojeda DI, Bakker FT, Wieringa JJ, Kidner C, Hardy OJ, Pennington RT, Herendeen PS, Bruneau A, Hughes CE (2021) The origin of the legumes is a complex paleopolyploid phylogenomic tangle closely associated with the cretaceous-paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction event. Syst Biol 70:508. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa041
doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syaa041
pubmed: 32483631
Ren L, Huang W, Cannon SB (2019) Reconstruction of ancestral genome reveals chromosome evolution history for selected legume species. New Phytol 223(4):2090–2103. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15770
doi: 10.1111/nph.15770
pubmed: 30834536
Stai JS, Yadav A, Sinou C, Bruneau A, Doyle JJ, Fernandez-Baca D, Cannon SB (2019) Cercis: a non-polyploid genomic relic within the generally polyploid legume family. Front Plant Sci 10:345. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00345
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00345
pubmed: 31105714
pmcid: 6499179
Kalderimis A, Lyne R, Butano D, Contrino S, Lyne M, Heimbach J, Hu F, Smith R, Stepan R, Sullivan J, Micklem G (2014) InterMine: extensive web services for modern biology. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Web Server Issue):W468–W472. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku301
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku301
pubmed: 24753429
pmcid: 4086141
Lyne R, Sullivan J, Butano D, Contrino S, Heimbach J, Hu F, Kalderimis A, Lyne M, Smith RN, Stepan R, Balakrishnan R, Binkley G, Harris T, Karra K, Moxon SA, Motenko H, Neuhauser S, Ruzicka L, Cherry M, Richardson J, Stein L, Westerfield M, Worthey E, Micklem G (2015) Cross-organism analysis using InterMine. Genesis 53(8):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22869
doi: 10.1002/dvg.22869
pubmed: 26097192
pmcid: 4545681
Wilkey AP, Brown AV, Cannon SB, Cannon EKS (2020) GCViT: a method for interactive, genome-wide visualization of resequencing and SNP array data. BMC Genomics 21:822
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07217-2
Priyam A, Woodcroft BJ, Rai V, Moghul I, Munagala A, Ter F, Chowdhary H, Pieniak I, Maynard LJ, Gibbins MA, Moon H, Davis-Richardson A, Uludag M, Watson-Haigh NS, Challis R, Nakamura H, Favreau E, Gomez EA, Pluskal T, Leonard G, Rumpf W, Wurm Y (2019) Sequenceserver: a modern graphical user interface for custom BLAST databases. Mol Biol Evol 36(12):2922–2924. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz185
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz185
pubmed: 31411700
pmcid: 6878946
Ziegler GR, Hartsock RH, Baxter I (2015) Zbrowse: an interactive GWAS results browser. PeerJ Comput Sci 1:e3. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.3
Youens-Clark K, Faga B, Yap IV, Stein L, Ware D (2009) CMap 1.01: a comparative mapping application for the Internet. Bioinformatics 25(22):3040–3042. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp458
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp458
pubmed: 19648141
pmcid: 2773250
Proost S, Mutwil M (2018) CoNekT: an open-source framework for comparative genomic and transcriptomic network analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W133–W140. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky336
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky336
pubmed: 29718322
pmcid: 6030989
Jiao Y, Leebens-Mack J, Ayyampalayam S, Bowers JE, McKain MR, McNeal J, Rolf M, Ruzicka DR, Wafula E, Wickett NJ, Wu X, Zhang Y, Wang J, Carpenter EJ, Deyholos MK, Kutchan TM, Chanderbali AS, Soltis PS, Stevenson DW, McCombie R, Pires JC, Wong GK, Soltis DE, Depamphilis CW (2012) A genome triplication associated with early diversification of the core eudicots. Genome Biol 13(1):R3. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r3
doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r3
pubmed: 22280555
pmcid: 3334584
Bauchet GJ, Bett KE, Cameron CT, Campbell JD, Cannon EKS, Cannon SB, Carlson JW, Chan A, Cleary A, Close TJ, Cook DR, Cooksey AM, Coyne C, Dash S, Dickstein R, Farmer AD, Fernandez-Baca D, Hokin S, Jones ES, Kang Y, Monteros MJ, Munoz-Amartriain M, Mysore KS, Pislariu CI, Richards C, Shi A, Town CD, Udvardi M, von Wettberg EB, Young ND, Zhao PX (2019) The future of legume genetic data resources: challenges, opportunities, and priorities. Legu Sci 1:e16. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.16
doi: 10.1002/leg3.16
Cooper L, Walls RL, Elser J, Gandolfo MA, Stevenson DW, Smith B, Preece J, Athreya B, Mungall CJ, Rensing S, Hiss M, Lang D, Reski R, Berardini TZ, Li D, Huala E, Schaeffer M, Menda N, Arnaud E, Shrestha R, Yamazaki Y, Jaiswal P (2013) The plant ontology as a tool for comparative plant anatomy and genomic analyses. Plant Cell Physiol 54(2):e1. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs163
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs163
pubmed: 23220694
Shrestha R, Arnaud E, Mauleon R, Senger M, Davenport GF, Hancock D, Morrison N, Bruskiewich R, McLaren G (2010) Multifunctional crop trait ontology for breeders’ data: field book, annotation, data discovery and semantic enrichment of the literature. AoB Plants 2010:plq008. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plq008
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plq008
pubmed: 22476066
pmcid: 3000699
Lavin M, Herendeen PS, Wojciechowski MF (2005) Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the tertiary. Syst Biol 54(4):575–594
doi: 10.1080/10635150590947131
Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, Xu D, Hellsten U, May GD, Yu Y, Sakurai T, Umezawa T, Bhattacharyya M, Sandhu D, Valliyodan B, Lindquist M, Peto M, Grant D, Shu S, Goodstein D, Barry K, Futrell-Griggs M, Abernathy B, Du J, Tian Z, Zhu L, Gill N, Joshi T, Libault M, Sethuraman A, Zhang X-C, Shinozaki K, Nguyen HT, Wing RA, Cregan P, Specht J, Grimwood J, Rokhsar D, Stacey G, Shoemaker RC, Jackson SA (2010b) Genome sequence of the paleopolyploid soybean. Nature 463:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08670
doi: 10.1038/nature08670
pubmed: 20075913
Kim KH, Kim JY, Lim WJ, Jeong S, Lee HY, Cho Y, Moon JK, Kim N (2020) Genome-wide association and epistatic interactions of flowering time in soybean cultivar. PLoS One 15(1):e0228114. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228114
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228114
pubmed: 31968016
pmcid: 6975553
Raggi L, Caproni L, Carboni A, Negri V (2019) Genome-Wide Association Study reveals candidate genes for flowering time variation in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Front Plant Sci 10:962. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00962
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00962
pubmed: 31428109
pmcid: 6689981
Xia Z, Watanabe S, Yamada T, Tsubokura Y, Nakashima H, Zhai H, Anai T, Sato S, Yamazaki T, Lu S, Wu H, Tabata S, Harada K (2012) Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(32):E2155–E2164. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117982109
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117982109
pubmed: 22619331
pmcid: 3420212
Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J (2010a) Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 463(7278):178–183
doi: 10.1038/nature08670
Rendon-Anaya M, Montero-Vargas JM, Saburido-Alvarez S, Vlasova A, Capella-Gutierrez S, Ordaz-Ortiz JJ, Aguilar OM, Vianello-Brondani RP, Santalla M, Delaye L, Gabaldon T, Gepts P, Winkler R, Guigo R, Delgado-Salinas A, Herrera-Estrella A (2017) Genomic history of the origin and domestication of common bean unveils its closest sister species. Genome Biol 18(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1190-6
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1190-6
pubmed: 28356141
pmcid: 5370463
Schmutz J, McClean PE, Mamidi S, Wu GA, Cannon SB, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, Shu S, Song Q, Chavarro C, Torres-Torres M, Geffroy V, Moghaddam SM, Gao D, Abernathy B, Barry K, Blair M, Brick MA, Chovatia M, Gepts P, Goodstein DM, Gonzales M, Hellsten U, Hyten DL, Jia G, Kelly JD, Kudrna D, Lee R, Richard MM, Miklas PN, Osorno JM, Rodrigues J, Thareau V, Urrea CA, Wang M, Yu Y, Zhang M, Wing RA, Cregan PB, Rokhsar DS, Jackson SA (2014) A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications. Nat Genet 46(7):707–713. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3008
doi: 10.1038/ng.3008
pubmed: 24908249
pmcid: 7048698
Gu W, Zhu J, Wallace DH, Singh SP, Weeden NF (1998) Analysis of genes controlling photoperiod sensitivity in common bean using DNA markers. Euphytica 102(1):125–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018340514388
doi: 10.1023/A:1018340514388
Moghaddam SM, Mamidi S, Osorno JM, Lee R, Brick M, Kelly J, Miklas P, Urrea C, Song Q, Cregan P, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, McClean PE (2016) Genome-Wide Association study identifies candidate loci underlying agronomic traits in a Middle American Diversity Panel of Common Bean. Plant Genome 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.02.0012
Oladzad A, Porch T, Rosas JC, Moghaddam SM, Beaver J, Beebe SE, Burridge J, Jochua CN, Miguel MA, Miklas PN, Raatz B, White JW, Lynch J, McClean PE (2019a) Single and multi-trait GWAS identify genetic factors associated with production traits in common bean under abiotic stress environments. G3 9(6):1881–1892. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400072
doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400072
pubmed: 31167806
pmcid: 6553540
Oladzad A, Zitnick-Anderson K, Jain S, Simons K, Osorno JM, McClean PE, Pasche JS (2019b) Genotypes and genomic regions associated with Rhizoctonia solani resistance in common bean. Front Plant Sci 10:956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00956
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00956
pubmed: 31396253
pmcid: 6667560
Naithani S, Gupta P, Preece J, D’Eustachio P, Elser JL, Garg P, Dikeman DA, Kiff J, Cook J, Olson A, Wei S, Tello-Ruiz MK, Mundo AF, Munoz-Pomer A, Mohammed S, Cheng T, Bolton E, Papatheodorou I, Stein L, Ware D, Jaiswal P (2020) Plant Reactome: a knowledgebase and resource for comparative pathway analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 48(D1):D1093–D1103. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz996
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz996
pubmed: 31680153