Tannin phenotyping of the Vitaceae reveals a phylogenetic linkage of epigallocatechin in berries and leaves.
Vitis vinifera
American wild grapevines
Asian wild grapevines
Condensed tannins
EGC+ vines
EGC− vines
Vitaceae
epigallocatechin
leaf
leaf margin teeth
pericarp
phenotype
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 09 2022
06 09 2022
Historique:
received:
04
12
2021
accepted:
13
06
2022
pubmed:
15
6
2022
medline:
9
9
2022
entrez:
14
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Condensed tannins, responsible for berry and wine astringency, may have been selected during grapevine domestication. This work examines the phylogenetic distribution of condensed tannins throughout the Vitaceae phylogenetic tree. Green berries and mature leaves of representative true-to-type members of the Vitaceae were collected before 'véraison', freeze-dried and pulverized, and condensed tannins were measured following depolymerization by nucleophilic addition of 2-mercaptoethanol to the C4 of the flavan-3-ol units in an organic acidic medium. Reaction products were separated and quantified by ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography/diode array detection/mass spectrometry. The original ability to incorporate epigallocatechin (EGC) into grapevine condensed tannins was lost independently in both the American and Eurasian/Asian branches of the Vitaceae, with exceptional cases of reversion to the ancestral EGC phenotype. This is particularly true in the genus Vitis, where we now find two radically distinct groups differing with respect to EGC content. While Vitis species from Asia are void of EGC, 50 % of the New World Vitis harbour EGC. Interestingly, the presence of EGC is tightly coupled with the degree of leaf margin serration. Noticeably, the rare Asian EGC-forming species are phylogenetically close to Vitis vinifera, the only remnant representative of Vitis in Eurasia. Both the wild ancestral V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris as well as the domesticated V. vinifera subsp. sativa can accumulate EGC and activate galloylation biosynthesis that compete for photoassimilates and reductive power.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Condensed tannins, responsible for berry and wine astringency, may have been selected during grapevine domestication. This work examines the phylogenetic distribution of condensed tannins throughout the Vitaceae phylogenetic tree.
METHODS
Green berries and mature leaves of representative true-to-type members of the Vitaceae were collected before 'véraison', freeze-dried and pulverized, and condensed tannins were measured following depolymerization by nucleophilic addition of 2-mercaptoethanol to the C4 of the flavan-3-ol units in an organic acidic medium. Reaction products were separated and quantified by ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography/diode array detection/mass spectrometry.
KEY RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The original ability to incorporate epigallocatechin (EGC) into grapevine condensed tannins was lost independently in both the American and Eurasian/Asian branches of the Vitaceae, with exceptional cases of reversion to the ancestral EGC phenotype. This is particularly true in the genus Vitis, where we now find two radically distinct groups differing with respect to EGC content. While Vitis species from Asia are void of EGC, 50 % of the New World Vitis harbour EGC. Interestingly, the presence of EGC is tightly coupled with the degree of leaf margin serration. Noticeably, the rare Asian EGC-forming species are phylogenetically close to Vitis vinifera, the only remnant representative of Vitis in Eurasia. Both the wild ancestral V. vinifera subsp. sylvestris as well as the domesticated V. vinifera subsp. sativa can accumulate EGC and activate galloylation biosynthesis that compete for photoassimilates and reductive power.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35700109
pii: 6608330
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac077
pmc: PMC9445598
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proanthocyanidins
0
Tannins
0
Catechin
8R1V1STN48
gallocatechol
HEJ6575V1X
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-171Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Chem Ecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):57-70
pubmed: 21116841
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Feb;95:217-28
pubmed: 26545592
BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Jul 05;13:141
pubmed: 23826735
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e78680
pubmed: 24236035
Theor Appl Genet. 2002 Jun;104(8):1246-1252
pubmed: 12582577
J Agric Food Chem. 2015 Aug 5;63(30):6823-34
pubmed: 26158394
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Oct 22;51(22):6475-81
pubmed: 14558765
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Feb;114(4):723-30
pubmed: 17221259
BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Feb 27;12:30
pubmed: 22369244
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 Feb;62(2):736-47
pubmed: 22138159
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Apr 5;65(13):2895-2901
pubmed: 28291348
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:473-503
pubmed: 15012217
Front Plant Sci. 2016 May 25;7:704
pubmed: 27252720
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Dec;129:258-267
pubmed: 30195477
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):E10309-E10318
pubmed: 29133421
Am J Bot. 2018 Feb;105(2):215-226
pubmed: 29578297
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Mar 17;11:263
pubmed: 32256506
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 13;10(1):1190
pubmed: 30867414
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Jan;154:106948
pubmed: 32866616
Phytochemistry. 2017 Feb;134:78-86
pubmed: 27887737
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2020 Jul;148:106809
pubmed: 32224125
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2019 Oct 4;4(2):3370-3371
pubmed: 33365998
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 07;10:1814
pubmed: 32117355