Signatures of copy number alterations in human cancer.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
26
04
2021
accepted:
07
04
2022
pubmed:
16
6
2022
medline:
2
7
2022
entrez:
15
6
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gains and losses of DNA are prevalent in cancer and emerge as a consequence of inter-related processes of replication stress, mitotic errors, spindle multipolarity and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, among others, which may lead to chromosomal instability and aneuploidy
Identifiants
pubmed: 35705804
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04738-6
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-04738-6
pmc: PMC9242861
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
984-991Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : FC001202
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES030993
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R01 ES032547
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L016311/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Arthritis Research UK
ID : FC001202
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Sansregret, L. & Swanton, C. The role of aneuploidy in cancer evolution. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 7, a028373 (2017).
pubmed: 28049655
pmcid: 5204330
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028373
Levine, M. S. & Holland, A. J. The impact of mitotic errors on cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 32, 620–638 (2018).
pubmed: 29802124
pmcid: 6004076
doi: 10.1101/gad.314351.118
Beroukhim, R. et al. The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature 463, 899–905 (2010).
pubmed: 20164920
pmcid: 2826709
doi: 10.1038/nature08822
Davoli, T., Uno, H., Wooten, E. C. & Elledge, S. J. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science 355, eaaf8399 (2017).
pubmed: 28104840
pmcid: 5592794
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8399
Taylor, A. M. et al. Genomic and functional approaches to understanding cancer aneuploidy. Cancer Cell 33, 676–689.e3 (2018).
pubmed: 29622463
pmcid: 6028190
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.007
Hoadley, K. A. et al. Cell-of-origin patterns dominate the molecular classification of 10,000 tumors from 33 types of cancer. Cell 173, 291–304.e6 (2018).
pubmed: 29625048
pmcid: 5957518
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.022
Bielski, C. M. et al. Genome doubling shapes the evolution and prognosis of advanced cancers. Nat. Genet. 50, 1189–1195 (2018).
pubmed: 30013179
pmcid: 6072608
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0165-1
Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).
pubmed: 21215367
pmcid: 3065307
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055
Bolhaqueiro, A. C. F. et al. Ongoing chromosomal instability and karyotype evolution in human colorectal cancer organoids. Nat. Genet. 51, 824–834 (2019).
pubmed: 31036964
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0399-6
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature 578, 94–101 (2020).
pubmed: 32025018
pmcid: 7054213
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1943-3
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415–421 (2013).
pubmed: 23945592
pmcid: 3776390
doi: 10.1038/nature12477
Koh, G., Degasperi, A., Zou, X., Momen, S. & Nik-Zainal, S. Mutational signatures: emerging concepts, caveats and clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 619–637 (2021).
pubmed: 34316057
doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00377-7
Li, Y. et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).
pubmed: 32025012
pmcid: 7025897
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1913-9
Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature 534, 47–54 (2016).
pubmed: 27135926
pmcid: 4910866
doi: 10.1038/nature17676
Thutkawkorapin, J., Eisfeldt, J., Tham, E. & Nilsson, D. pyCancerSig: subclassifying human cancer with comprehensive single nucleotide, structural and microsatellite mutational signature deconstruction from whole genome sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 21, 128 (2020).
pubmed: 32245405
pmcid: 7118897
doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3451-8
Steele, C. D. et al. Undifferentiated sarcomas develop through distinct evolutionary pathways. Cancer Cell 35, 441–456.e8 (2019).
pubmed: 30889380
pmcid: 6428691
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.02.002
Maclachlan, K. H. et al. Copy number signatures predict chromothripsis and clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 12, 5172 (2021).
pubmed: 34453055
pmcid: 8397708
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25469-8
Macintyre, G. et al. Copy number signatures and mutational processes in ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 50, 1262–1270 (2018).
pubmed: 30104763
pmcid: 6130818
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0179-8
Pladsen, A. V. et al. Copy number motifs expose genome instability type and predict driver events and disease outcome in breast cancer. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/769356 (2019).
Wang, S. et al. Copy number signature analysis tool and its application in prostate cancer reveals distinct mutational processes and clinical outcomes. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009557 (2021).
pubmed: 33945534
pmcid: 8121287
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009557
Islam, S. M. A. et al. Uncovering novel mutational signatures by de novo extraction with SigProfilerExtractor. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.13.422570 (2021).
Lopez, S. et al. Interplay between whole-genome doubling and the accumulation of deleterious alterations in cancer evolution. Nat. Genet. 52, 283–293 (2020).
pubmed: 32139907
pmcid: 7116784
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0584-7
Tarabichi, M. et al. A practical guide to cancer subclonal reconstruction from DNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 18, 144–155 (2021).
pubmed: 33398189
pmcid: 7867630
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01013-2
Davoli, T. et al. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome. Cell 155, 948–962 (2013).
pubmed: 24183448
pmcid: 3891052
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.011
Kim, H. et al. Extrachromosomal DNA is associated with oncogene amplification and poor outcome across multiple cancers. Nat. Genet. 52, 891–897 (2020).
pubmed: 32807987
pmcid: 7484012
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0678-2
Burrell, R. A. et al. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 494, 492–496 (2013).
pubmed: 23446422
pmcid: 4636055
doi: 10.1038/nature11935
Zheng, S. et al. Comprehensive pan-genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Cancer Cell 29, 723–736 (2016).
pubmed: 27165744
pmcid: 4864952
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.002
Davis, C. F. et al. The somatic genomic landscape of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 26, 319–330 (2014).
pubmed: 25155756
pmcid: 4160352
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.014
Menghi, F. et al. The tandem duplicator phenotype is a prevalent genome-wide cancer configuration driven by distinct gene mutations. Cancer Cell 34, 197–210.e5 (2018).
pubmed: 30017478
pmcid: 6481635
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.008
Deshpande, V. et al. Exploring the landscape of focal amplifications in cancer using AmpliconArchitect. Nat. Commun. 10, 392 (2019).
pubmed: 30674876
pmcid: 6344493
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08200-y
Hadi, K. et al. Distinct classes of complex structural variation uncovered across thousands of cancer genome graphs. Cell 183, 197–210.e32 (2020).
pubmed: 33007263
pmcid: 7912537
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.006
Lo, A. W. et al. DNA amplification by breakage/fusion/bridge cycles initiated by spontaneous telomere loss in a human cancer cell line. Neoplasia 4, 531–538 (2002).
pubmed: 12407447
pmcid: 1503667
doi: 10.1038/sj.neo.7900267
ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6
Cortes-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).
pubmed: 32025003
pmcid: 7058534
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0576-7
Knudson, A. G. Hereditary cancer: two hits revisited. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 122, 135–140 (1996).
pubmed: 8601560
doi: 10.1007/BF01366952
Holmfeldt, L. et al. The genomic landscape of hypodiploid acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 45, 242–252 (2013).
pubmed: 23334668
pmcid: 3919793
doi: 10.1038/ng.2532
Ricketts, C. J. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas comprehensive molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep. 23, 3698 (2018).
pubmed: 29925010
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.06.032
Scarpa, A. et al. Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nature 543, 65–71 (2017).
pubmed: 28199314
doi: 10.1038/nature21063
Nichols, C. A. et al. Loss of heterozygosity of essential genes represents a widespread class of potential cancer vulnerabilities. Nat. Commun. 11, 2517 (2020).
pubmed: 32433464
pmcid: 7239950
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16399-y
Martincorena, I. et al. Universal patterns of selection in cancer and somatic tissues. Cell 171, 1029–1041.e21 (2017).
pubmed: 29056346
pmcid: 5720395
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.042
Van den Eynden, J., Basu, S. & Larsson, E. Somatic mutation patterns in hemizygous genomic regions unveil purifying selection during tumor evolution. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006506 (2016).
pubmed: 28027311
pmcid: 5189942
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006506
McBride, D. J. et al. Tandem duplication of chromosomal segments is common in ovarian and breast cancer genomes. J. Pathol. 227, 446–455 (2012).
pubmed: 22514011
pmcid: 3428857
doi: 10.1002/path.4042
Esteller, M. et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 92, 564–569 (2000).
pubmed: 10749912
doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.7.564
Sztupinszki, Z. et al. Migrating the SNP array-based homologous recombination deficiency measures to next generation sequencing data of breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 4, 16 (2018).
pubmed: 29978035
pmcid: 6028448
doi: 10.1038/s41523-018-0066-6
Sakofsky, C. J. et al. Repair of multiple simultaneous double-strand breaks causes bursts of genome-wide clustered hypermutation. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000464 (2019).
pubmed: 31568516
pmcid: 6786661
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000464
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive and integrated genomic characterization of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Cell 171, 950–965.e28 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.014
Bindra, R. S. et al. Down-regulation of Rad51 and decreased homologous recombination in hypoxic cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8504–8518 (2004).
pubmed: 15367671
pmcid: 516750
doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.19.8504-8518.2004
Chan, N. et al. Chronic hypoxia decreases synthesis of homologous recombination proteins to offset chemoresistance and radioresistance. Cancer Res. 68, 605–614 (2008).
pubmed: 18199558
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5472
Bhandari, V. et al. Molecular landmarks of tumor hypoxia across cancer types. Nat. Genet. 51, 308–318 (2019).
pubmed: 30643250
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0318-2
Thorsson, V. et al. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 51, 411–412 (2019).
pubmed: 31433971
doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.08.004
Overgaard, J. Hypoxic modification of radiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother. Oncol. 100, 22–32 (2011).
pubmed: 21511351
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.004
Sinha, S. et al. Higher prevalence of homologous recombination deficiency in tumors from African Americans versus European Americans. Nat. Cancer 1, 112–121 (2020).
pubmed: 35121843
pmcid: 8921973
doi: 10.1038/s43018-019-0009-7
de Jonge, M. M. et al. Frequent homologous recombination deficiency in high-grade endometrial carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 25, 1087–1097 (2019).
pubmed: 30413523
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1443
Abbasi, A. & Alexandrov, L. B. Significance and limitations of the use of next-generation sequencing technologies for detecting mutational signatures. DNA Repair (Amst.) 107, 103200 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2021.103200
Davies, H. et al. HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures. Nat. Med. 23, 517–525 (2017).
pubmed: 28288110
pmcid: 5833945
doi: 10.1038/nm.4292
Van Loo, P. et al. Allele-specific copy number analysis of tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16910–16915 (2010).
pubmed: 20837533
pmcid: 2947907
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1009843107
Carter, S. L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).
pubmed: 22544022
pmcid: 4383288
doi: 10.1038/nbt.2203
Sandve, G. K., Ferkingstad, E. & Nygard, S. Sequential Monte Carlo multiple testing. Bioinformatics 27, 3235–3241 (2011).
pubmed: 21998154
pmcid: 3223366
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr568
Liu, J. et al. An integrated TCGA pan-cancer clinical data Resource to drive high-quality survival outcome analytics. Cell 173, 400–416.e11 (2018).
pubmed: 29625055
pmcid: 6066282
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.052
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer. Science 354, 618–622 (2016).
pubmed: 27811275
pmcid: 6141049
doi: 10.1126/science.aag0299
Grossman, R. L. et al. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1109–1112 (2016).
pubmed: 27653561
pmcid: 6309165
doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607591
Tate, J. G. et al. COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D941–D947 (2019).
pubmed: 30371878
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1015
Knijnenburg, T. A. et al. Genomic and molecular landscape of DNA damage tepair deficiency across The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Rep. 23, 239–254.e6 (2018).
pubmed: 29617664
pmcid: 5961503
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.076
Nguyen, L., Martens, W. M., Van Hoeck, A. & Cuppen, E. Pan-cancer landscape of homologous recombination deficiency. Nat. Commun. 11, 5584 (2020).
pubmed: 33149131
pmcid: 7643118
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19406-4
Yost, S., Ruark, E., Alexandrov, L. B. & Rahman, N. Insights into BRCA cancer predisposition from integrated germline and somatic analyses in 7632 cancers. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 3, pkz028 (2019).
pubmed: 31360904
pmcid: 6649772
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz028
Takaya, H., Nakai, H., Takamatsu, S., Mandai, M. & Matsumura, N. Homologous recombination deficiency status-based classification of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Sci Rep. 10, 2757 (2020).
pubmed: 32066851
pmcid: 7026096
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59671-3
Eustace, A. et al. A 26-gene hypoxia signature predicts benefit from hypoxia-modifying therapy in laryngeal cancer but not bladder cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 4879–4888 (2013).
pubmed: 23820108
pmcid: 3797516
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0542
Lechner, M. et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma identifies novel genetic alterations in HPV
pubmed: 23718828
pmcid: 4064312
doi: 10.1186/gm453
Mardin, B. R. et al. A cell-based model system links chromothripsis with hyperploidy. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 828 (2015).
pubmed: 26415501
pmcid: 4592670
doi: 10.15252/msb.20156505
Nilsen, G. et al. Copynumber: efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation. BMC Genomics 13, 591 (2012).
pubmed: 23442169
pmcid: 3582591
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-591
Browning, B. L., Zhou, Y. & Browning, S. R. A one-penny imputed genome from next-generation reference panels. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103, 338–348 (2018).
pubmed: 30100085
pmcid: 6128308
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.07.015
Nik-Zainal, S. et al. The life history of 21 breast cancers. Cell 149, 994–1007 (2012).
pubmed: 22608083
pmcid: 3428864
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.023
Behjati, S. et al. Recurrent mutation of IGF signalling genes and distinct patterns of genomic rearrangement in osteosarcoma. Nat. Commun. 8, 15936 (2017).
pubmed: 28643781
pmcid: 5490007
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15936
Pinto, E. M. et al. Genomic landscape of paediatric adrenocortical tumours. Nat. Commun. 6, 6302 (2015).
pubmed: 25743702
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7302