Chromosome-scale assembly and annotation of the perennial ryegrass genome.

Chromosome-scale assembly Comparative genomics Festuca-Lolium complex Lolium perenne Perennial ryegrass

Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Jul 2022
Historique:
received: 06 12 2021
accepted: 14 06 2022
entrez: 13 7 2022
pubmed: 14 7 2022
medline: 16 7 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The availability of chromosome-scale genome assemblies is fundamentally important to advance genetics and breeding in crops, as well as for evolutionary and comparative genomics. The improvement of long-read sequencing technologies and the advent of optical mapping and chromosome conformation capture technologies in the last few years, significantly promoted the development of chromosome-scale genome assemblies of model plants and crop species. In grasses, chromosome-scale genome assemblies recently became available for cultivated and wild species of the Triticeae subfamily. Development of state-of-the-art genomic resources in species of the Poeae subfamily, which includes important crops like fescues and ryegrasses, is lagging behind the progress in the cereal species. Here, we report a new chromosome-scale genome sequence assembly for perennial ryegrass, obtained by combining PacBio long-read sequencing, Illumina short-read polishing, BioNano optical mapping and Hi-C scaffolding. More than 90% of the total genome size of perennial ryegrass (approximately 2.55 Gb) is covered by seven pseudo-chromosomes that show high levels of collinearity to the orthologous chromosomes of Triticeae species. The transposon fraction of perennial ryegrass was found to be relatively low, approximately 35% of the total genome content, which is less than half of the genome repeat content of cultivated cereal species. We predicted 54,629 high-confidence gene models, 10,287 long non-coding RNAs and a total of 8,393 short non-coding RNAs in the perennial ryegrass genome. The new reference genome sequence and annotation presented here are valuable resources for comparative genomic studies in grasses, as well as for breeding applications and will expedite the development of productive varieties in perennial ryegrass and related species.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The availability of chromosome-scale genome assemblies is fundamentally important to advance genetics and breeding in crops, as well as for evolutionary and comparative genomics. The improvement of long-read sequencing technologies and the advent of optical mapping and chromosome conformation capture technologies in the last few years, significantly promoted the development of chromosome-scale genome assemblies of model plants and crop species. In grasses, chromosome-scale genome assemblies recently became available for cultivated and wild species of the Triticeae subfamily. Development of state-of-the-art genomic resources in species of the Poeae subfamily, which includes important crops like fescues and ryegrasses, is lagging behind the progress in the cereal species.
RESULTS RESULTS
Here, we report a new chromosome-scale genome sequence assembly for perennial ryegrass, obtained by combining PacBio long-read sequencing, Illumina short-read polishing, BioNano optical mapping and Hi-C scaffolding. More than 90% of the total genome size of perennial ryegrass (approximately 2.55 Gb) is covered by seven pseudo-chromosomes that show high levels of collinearity to the orthologous chromosomes of Triticeae species. The transposon fraction of perennial ryegrass was found to be relatively low, approximately 35% of the total genome content, which is less than half of the genome repeat content of cultivated cereal species. We predicted 54,629 high-confidence gene models, 10,287 long non-coding RNAs and a total of 8,393 short non-coding RNAs in the perennial ryegrass genome.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The new reference genome sequence and annotation presented here are valuable resources for comparative genomic studies in grasses, as well as for breeding applications and will expedite the development of productive varieties in perennial ryegrass and related species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35831814
doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08697-0
pii: 10.1186/s12864-022-08697-0
pmc: PMC9281035
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

505

Subventions

Organisme : Innovationsfonden
ID : 6150-00020B

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Plant Physiol. 2013 Feb;161(2):571-82
pubmed: 23184232
Nature. 2018 May;557(7705):424-428
pubmed: 29743678
Genome Res. 2001 Sep;11(9):1527-40
pubmed: 11544196
Plant J. 2015 Nov;84(4):816-26
pubmed: 26408275
BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 May 14;5:59
pubmed: 15144565
Mol Biol Evol. 2020 Dec 16;37(12):3507-3524
pubmed: 32681796
Nat Protoc. 2016 Sep;11(9):1650-67
pubmed: 27560171
J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20
pubmed: 7463489
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Dec;108(1):25-40
pubmed: 12923626
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W435-9
pubmed: 16845043
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15;106(37):15780-5
pubmed: 19717446
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24;101(34):12404-10
pubmed: 15240870
Mol Genet Genomics. 2011 Dec;286(5-6):433-47
pubmed: 22081040
Mol Plant. 2019 Jun 3;12(6):879-892
pubmed: 30639314
Bioinformatics. 2019 Aug 15;35(16):2856-2858
pubmed: 30615063
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Dec 9;100(25):15253-8
pubmed: 14645721
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Nov;37(21):7002-13
pubmed: 19786494
Plant Physiol. 2014 Feb;164(2):513-24
pubmed: 24306534
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):953-71
pubmed: 17446895
Science. 2017 Apr 7;356(6333):92-95
pubmed: 28336562
Ann Bot. 2012 Dec;110(8):1641-50
pubmed: 23002268
PLoS One. 2014 May 02;9(5):e91929
pubmed: 24786468
Plant J. 2011 Sep;67(5):763-73
pubmed: 21554456
Plant J. 2013 Mar;73(6):952-65
pubmed: 23253213
Genome. 2002 Apr;45(2):282-95
pubmed: 11962626
Plant Physiol. 2006 Apr;140(4):1397-405
pubmed: 16500994
Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 15;33(16):2583-2585
pubmed: 28398459
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249636
pubmed: 33831050
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 20;11(1):989
pubmed: 32080174
Bioinformatics. 2014 May 1;30(9):1236-40
pubmed: 24451626
Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3718-31
pubmed: 20040540
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Mar 1;25(5):955-64
pubmed: 9023104
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 15;9(8):e103567
pubmed: 25126744
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
pubmed: 10827456
Nature. 2010 Feb 11;463(7282):763-8
pubmed: 20148030
Plant J. 1998 Dec;16(6):721-8
pubmed: 10069078
New Phytol. 2006;169(1):9-26
pubmed: 16390415
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Sep;56(2):159-69
pubmed: 15604735
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Aug 20;21(1):385
pubmed: 34416864
HFSP J. 2009 Oct;3(5):350-66
pubmed: 20357892
Nat Genet. 2000 May;25(1):25-9
pubmed: 10802651
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jul;91(2):282-8
pubmed: 24169776
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):487-93
pubmed: 21209072
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 15;27(2):573-80
pubmed: 9862982
Genome Biol. 2019 Dec 18;20(1):284
pubmed: 31849336
J Mol Biol. 2004 May 14;338(5):1027-36
pubmed: 15111065
J Exp Bot. 2002 Apr;53(370):947-58
pubmed: 11912237
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 1;31(19):3210-2
pubmed: 26059717
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Jan;28(1):501-11
pubmed: 20724380
Genome Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):188-96
pubmed: 18025269
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 Feb;36(2):e12
pubmed: 18187504
Methods. 2012 Nov;58(3):268-76
pubmed: 22652625
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 28;117(17):9451-9457
pubmed: 32300014
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 15;29(24):5029-35
pubmed: 11812833
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Sep 2;10(9):3347-3364
pubmed: 32727925
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):284-289
pubmed: 33239781
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 14;9:18
pubmed: 18194517
Genome Res. 2017 May;27(5):722-736
pubmed: 28298431
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D974-81
pubmed: 25324309
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D325-D334
pubmed: 33290552
Genome Biol Evol. 2021 Oct 1;13(10):
pubmed: 34695194
Cell Syst. 2016 Jul;3(1):99-101
pubmed: 27467250
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 4;6:e4958
pubmed: 29888139
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1859-75
pubmed: 15728110
Science. 2004 Mar 12;303(5664):1640-4
pubmed: 15016992
Protein Sci. 2018 Jan;27(1):135-145
pubmed: 28884485
Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1147-59
pubmed: 15140833
Gigascience. 2018 Aug 1;7(8):
pubmed: 30052957
Gigascience. 2018 Dec 1;7(12):
pubmed: 30418570
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):
pubmed: 30115783
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D1468-D1474
pubmed: 34747486
Mol Ecol Resour. 2021 Apr;21(3):849-870
pubmed: 33098268
Ann Bot. 2021 Aug 26;128(3):357-369
pubmed: 33949648
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D335-D342
pubmed: 29112718
BMC Genomics. 2012 Apr 18;13:140
pubmed: 22513206
Science. 2003 Dec 5;302(5651):1751-4
pubmed: 14593187
Nature. 2017 Apr 26;544(7651):427-433
pubmed: 28447635
Plant Cell. 2019 Sep;31(9):2035-2051
pubmed: 31311836
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D1057-63
pubmed: 25378336
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19581-6
pubmed: 17158798
Nature. 2017 Nov 23;551(7681):498-502
pubmed: 29143815
BMC Genomics. 2008 Oct 31;9:517
pubmed: 18976482
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Apr;8(2):155-62
pubmed: 15752995
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
Genome Res. 1999 Sep;9(9):868-77
pubmed: 10508846
Nat Plants. 2017 Sep;3(9):742-748
pubmed: 28848243
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018 Apr;49:79-84
pubmed: 29597064
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e112963
pubmed: 25409509
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Apr;110(6):1011-9
pubmed: 15742203
Genome Biol. 2008 Jan 11;9(1):R7
pubmed: 18190707
Plant Physiol. 2013 Nov;163(3):1323-37
pubmed: 24096412
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Aug 29;5:431
pubmed: 25221560
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D1141-7
pubmed: 26527721
Plant Cell. 2007 Oct;19(10):2975-87
pubmed: 17921315
Plant Physiol. 2012 Feb;158(2):590-600
pubmed: 22198273
Genome Biol. 2018 Aug 17;19(1):103
pubmed: 30115100
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(6):1383-97
pubmed: 18390848
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Dec;8(12):973-82
pubmed: 17984973
Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 15;29(22):2933-5
pubmed: 24008419
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
pubmed: 15034147
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(9):3100-8
pubmed: 17452365

Auteurs

Istvan Nagy (I)

Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, Slagelse, DK-4200, Denmark. Istvan.Nagy@qgg.au.dk.

Elisabeth Veeckman (E)

Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Caritasstraat 39, Melle, B-9090, Belgium.
Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
Present address: DLF Seeds A/S, Denmark, Højerupvej 31, Store Heddinge, DK-4660, Denmark.

Chang Liu (C)

Zentrum für Molekularbiologie der Pflanzen (ZMBP), Eberhard Karls Universität, Auf der Morgenstelle 32, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Present address: Institut für Biologie, Universität Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 30, Stuttgart, 70599, Germany.

Michiel Van Bel (MV)

Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.

Klaas Vandepoele (K)

Bioinformatics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
VIB Center for Plant Systems Biology, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Technologiepark 71, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.

Christian Sig Jensen (CS)

DLF Seeds A/S, Denmark, Højerupvej 31, Store Heddinge, DK-4660, Denmark.

Tom Ruttink (T)

Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Plant Sciences Unit, Caritasstraat 39, Melle, B-9090, Belgium.

Torben Asp (T)

Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Forsøgsvej 1, Slagelse, DK-4200, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
Genome, Plant Medicago sativa Crops, Agricultural Genomics Polyploidy

Fine mapping of a major QTL, qECQ8, for rice taste quality.

Shan Zhu, Guoping Tang, Zhou Yang et al.
1.00
Oryza Quantitative Trait Loci Taste Chromosome Mapping Phenotype
Arabidopsis Amorphophallus Plants, Genetically Modified Phylogeny Droughts

Classifications MeSH