Evaluation of tropical-temperate transitions: An example of climatic characterization in the Asian Palmate group of Araliaceae.
Araliaceae
Asian Palmate Group
GEnS classification
Holdridge classification
Köppen-Geiger classification
data cleaning
ecoregions
latitudinal zonation
online biodiversity databases
world climatic regionalization
Journal
American journal of botany
ISSN: 1537-2197
Titre abrégé: Am J Bot
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370467
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
12
08
2022
received:
20
10
2021
accepted:
12
08
2022
pubmed:
31
8
2022
medline:
4
10
2022
entrez:
30
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There has been a great increase in using climatic data in phylogenetic studies over the past decades. However, compiling the high-quality spatial data needed to perform accurate climatic reconstructions is time-consuming and can result in poor geographical coverage. Therefore, researchers often resort to qualitative approximations. Our aim was to evaluate the climatic characterization of the genera of the Asian Palmate Group (AsPG) of Araliaceae as an exemplar lineage of plants showing tropical-temperate transitions. We compiled a curated worldwide spatial database of the AsPG genera and created five raster layers representing bioclimatic regionalizations of the world. Then, we crossed the database with the layers to climatically characterize the AsPG genera. We found large disagreement in the climatic characterization of genera among regionalizations and little support for the climatic nature of the tropical-temperate distribution of the AsPG. Both results are attributed to the complexity of delimiting tropical, subtropical, and temperate climates in the world and to the distribution of the study group in regions with transitional climatic conditions. The complexity in the climatic classification of this example of the tropical-temperate transitions calls for a general climatic revision of other tropical-temperate lineages. In fact, we argue that, to properly evaluate tropical-temperate transitions across the tree of life, we cannot ignore the complexity of distribution ranges.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36039662
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16059
pmc: PMC9826302
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1488-1507Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. American Journal of Botany published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Botanical Society of America.
Références
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(2):340-354
pubmed: 25644136
Conserv Biol. 2007 Jun;21(3):853-63
pubmed: 17531062
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11549-55
pubmed: 18695216
Am J Bot. 2022 Sep;109(9):1488-1507
pubmed: 36039662
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Feb 07;10:1731
pubmed: 32117331
Ecol Lett. 2013 Aug;16(8):1104-14
pubmed: 23773417
Sci Data. 2018 Oct 30;5:180214
pubmed: 30375988
Front Genet. 2015 Apr 08;6:130
pubmed: 25904934
Am J Bot. 2010 Aug;97(8):1342-53
pubmed: 21616887
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 19;111(33):12115-20
pubmed: 25092321
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 06;280(1756):20122649
pubmed: 23390102
Am Nat. 2017 Aug;190(S1):S87-S104
pubmed: 28731827
Science. 2006 Oct 6;314(5796):102-6
pubmed: 17023653
Am J Bot. 2021 Feb;108(2):334-345
pubmed: 33280080
Evolution. 2013 Aug;67(8):2240-57
pubmed: 23888848
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2015 Nov;92:181-92
pubmed: 26143714
Ann Bot. 2021 Apr 17;127(5):597-611
pubmed: 32386290
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1997 Dec;8(3):385-97
pubmed: 9417896
Zookeys. 2011;(150):117-26
pubmed: 22207809
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 7;276(1664):1971-80
pubmed: 19324802
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Sep 11;280(1770):20131622
pubmed: 24026818
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Jul;160:107118
pubmed: 33609711
Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 Mar;23(3):141-8
pubmed: 18291557
Am J Bot. 2001 Dec;88(12):2275-85
pubmed: 21669660
Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 28;19(14):R575-83
pubmed: 19640496
Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):315-31
pubmed: 17355570
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Jan;70:492-503
pubmed: 24184542
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2021 Jan;154:106948
pubmed: 32866616
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Apr;27(1):1-20
pubmed: 12679067
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 7;274(1612):919-28
pubmed: 17284409
PLoS Biol. 2010 Jun 01;8(6):e1000385
pubmed: 20532234
PhytoKeys. 2013 Dec 17;(31):21-61
pubmed: 24399902
PLoS One. 2007 Nov 07;2(11):e1124
pubmed: 17987112
New Phytol. 2019 Jun;222(4):1994-2008
pubmed: 30536385
Evolution. 2013 Jun;67(6):1741-55
pubmed: 23730766
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Jan;26(1):189-190
pubmed: 31891658
Bioscience. 2017 Jun 1;67(6):534-545
pubmed: 28608869
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Jun 22;17(1):146
pubmed: 28641575
Front Plant Sci. 2013 Jun 03;4:167
pubmed: 23761798
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018 Jul;124:151-161
pubmed: 29551522
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Jun;96(3):842-876
pubmed: 33385187
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 3;111(22):8125-30
pubmed: 24847062
Conserv Biol. 2009 Dec;23(6):1418-26
pubmed: 20078642
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 16;5:12246
pubmed: 26179320
New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(1):66-73
pubmed: 25103958
Ecol Lett. 2016 Aug;19(8):992-1006
pubmed: 27250865
J Exp Biol. 2017 Jan 1;220(Pt 1):42-52
pubmed: 28057827
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):689-98
pubmed: 15253354
J Ethnopharmacol. 2018 Oct 28;225:136-158
pubmed: 30026169
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):639-44
pubmed: 16701326