An Arabidopsis thaliana arabinogalactan-protein (AGP31) and several cationic AGP fragments catalyse the boron bridging of rhamnogalacturonan-II.
Arabidopsis thaliana
arabinogalactan-protein
borate diester bridges
pectic polysaccharide
plant cell wall
rhamnogalacturonan-II
Journal
The Biochemical journal
ISSN: 1470-8728
Titre abrégé: Biochem J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2984726R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 09 2022
30 09 2022
Historique:
received:
24
06
2022
revised:
02
09
2022
accepted:
02
09
2022
pubmed:
6
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
entrez:
5
9
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II) is a complex pectic domain in plant primary cell walls. In vivo, most RG-II domains are covalently dimerised via borate diester bridges, essential for correct cell-wall assembly, but the dimerisation of pure RG-II monomers by boric acid in vitro is extremely slow. Cationic 'chaperones' can promote dimerisation, probably by overcoming the mutual repulsion between neighbouring anionic RG-II molecules. Highly effective artificial chaperones include Pb2+ and polyhistidine, but the proposed natural chaperones remained elusive. We have now tested cationic peptide fragments of several Arabidopsis thaliana arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) as candidates. Fragments of AGP17, 18, 19 and 31 were effective, typically at ∼25 µg/ml (9-19 µM), promoting the boron bridging of 16-20 µM monomeric RG-II at pH 4.8 in vitro. Native AGP31 glycoprotein was also effective, and hexahistidine was moderately so. All chaperones tested interacted reversibly with RG-II and were not consumed during the reaction; thus they acted catalytically, and may constitute the first reported boron-acting enzyme activity, an RG-II borate diesterase. Many of the peptide chaperones became less effective catalysts at higher concentration, which we interpret as due to the formation of RG-II-peptide complexes with a net positive charge, as mutually repulsive as negatively charged pure RG-II molecules. The four unique AGPs studied here may serve an enzymic role in the living plant cell, acting on RG-II within Golgi cisternae and/or in the apoplast after secretion. In this way, RG-II and specific AGPs may contribute to cell-wall assembly and hence plant cell expansion and development.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36062804
pii: 231748
doi: 10.1042/BCJ20220340
pmc: PMC9555800
doi:
Substances chimiques
Arabidopsis Proteins
0
Borates
0
Cations
0
Mucoproteins
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Plant Proteins
0
Rhamnogalacturonans
0
arabinogalactan proteins
0
Lead
2P299V784P
Boron
N9E3X5056Q
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1967-1984Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/H000690/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s).
Références
Planta. 2000 May;210(6):865-74
pubmed: 10872216
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):403-19
pubmed: 20388666
J Biol Chem. 1996 Sep 13;271(37):22923-30
pubmed: 8798473
Plant Cell. 2006 Oct;18(10):2593-607
pubmed: 17056709
Plant J. 2000 Apr;22(2):165-76
pubmed: 10792832
Nature. 2017 Apr 6;544(7648):65-70
pubmed: 28329766
Ann Bot. 2014 Oct;114(6):1087-97
pubmed: 24685714
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jul 2;49(W1):W285-W292
pubmed: 33905510
J Biol Chem. 2012 Mar 16;287(12):9623-32
pubmed: 22270363
Ann Bot. 2022 Sep 16;:
pubmed: 36112021
Science. 2001 Oct 26;294(5543):846-9
pubmed: 11679668
Plant J. 1999 Aug;19(3):321-31
pubmed: 10476079
Int Rev Cytol. 1997;174:195-291
pubmed: 9161008
Plant J. 2018 Dec;96(5):1036-1050
pubmed: 30203879
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Aug 29;10:1022
pubmed: 31555307
Physiol Plant. 2002 Apr;114(4):637-644
pubmed: 11975739
Plant Mol Biol. 2001 Mar;45(4):421-35
pubmed: 11352461
Plant J. 2014 Jul;79(1):139-49
pubmed: 24804932
Plant J. 2014 Feb;77(4):534-46
pubmed: 24320597
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:109-39
pubmed: 15377216
Biochem J. 1962 Nov;85:383-8
pubmed: 14002491
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018 Mar;17(3):413-421
pubmed: 29237727
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2011 May;13(3):431-8
pubmed: 21489093
Plant J. 1996 Jun;9(6):919-25
pubmed: 8696368
Plant Physiol. 2010 Jun;153(2):485-513
pubmed: 20395450
Plant Cell. 2013 Oct;25(10):4028-43
pubmed: 24104564
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16319-24
pubmed: 12451175
Plant Cell Physiol. 2001 Feb;42(2):129-37
pubmed: 11230566
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Jun;11(3):266-77
pubmed: 18486536
New Phytol. 2019 Dec;224(4):1518-1531
pubmed: 31549420
New Phytol. 2016 Jan;209(1):241-51
pubmed: 26301520
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001 Sep;58(10):1399-417
pubmed: 11693522
Plant J. 2007 Feb;49(4):629-40
pubmed: 17217456
SLAS Technol. 2020 Aug;25(4):329-344
pubmed: 32468908
Plant J. 2013 Oct;76(1):61-72
pubmed: 23802881
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 May;52(1):91-102
pubmed: 12825692
J Biol Chem. 1999 May 7;274(19):13098-104
pubmed: 10224062
Plant Cell Physiol. 2005 Jun;46(6):975-84
pubmed: 15840645
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 May;14(3):447-57
pubmed: 22222112
Plant Physiol. 2004 Jan;134(1):339-51
pubmed: 14671014