Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation.
exome
fetus
genome
neonate
sequencing
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 08 2022
24 08 2022
Historique:
received:
29
07
2022
revised:
21
08
2022
accepted:
21
08
2022
entrez:
23
9
2022
pubmed:
24
9
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3-5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the 'Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes' (PAGE) study and 'Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study' performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively 'unselected' congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36140685
pii: genes13091517
doi: 10.3390/genes13091517
pmc: PMC9498826
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):509-518
pubmed: 33847422
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):225
pubmed: 29986673
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100(3):418-424
pubmed: 33128783
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 4;171(12):e173438
pubmed: 28973083
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jun;42(7):822-830
pubmed: 35089622
Clin Genet. 2021 Aug;100(2):219-226
pubmed: 33942288
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):e39-e50
pubmed: 33590639
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):758-767
pubmed: 30712878
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep;58(3):377-387
pubmed: 33142350
Am J Med Genet A. 2013 Jul;161A(7):1619-27
pubmed: 23696517
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1171-1178
pubmed: 28425981
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 21;13(9):e0204158
pubmed: 30240445
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):43-51
pubmed: 32388881
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(6):736-743
pubmed: 35411553
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021 May;21(5):465-474
pubmed: 33877000
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):116-26
pubmed: 20842655
Hum Genet. 2016 Mar;135(3):359-62
pubmed: 26742503
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:349-64
pubmed: 20824455
Prenat Diagn. 2010 Feb;30(2):93-102
pubmed: 20077440
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Nov;34(11):e23480
pubmed: 32779812
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):723-730
pubmed: 34940998
J Mol Diagn. 2020 Sep;22(9):1151-1161
pubmed: 32553884
Lancet. 2019 Feb 23;393(10173):747-757
pubmed: 30712880
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Nov 30;11(12):
pubmed: 34943476
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Apr;40(5):618-625
pubmed: 32037575
Clin Genet. 2020 Sep;98(3):215-230
pubmed: 32410215
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Oct 01;32(10):1665-1675
pubmed: 28387813
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Apr;25(4):416-422
pubmed: 28120840
Prenat Diagn. 2017 Dec;37(12):1225-1231
pubmed: 29049852
Front Genet. 2021 Sep 10;12:728544
pubmed: 34567078
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;30(1):11-8
pubmed: 17559183
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):538-546
pubmed: 27988140
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):610-20
pubmed: 23512800
Genet Med. 2019 May;21(5):1065-1073
pubmed: 30293990
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9861
pubmed: 32555262
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;45(5):499-507
pubmed: 25483938
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Jun;42(7):831-844
pubmed: 35506549
Prenat Diagn. 2016 Apr;36(4):312-20
pubmed: 26824862
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(6):662-685
pubmed: 35170059
Prenat Diagn. 2019 Nov;39(12):1064-1069
pubmed: 31393021
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;29(2):73-79
pubmed: 28134670
Hum Reprod. 2014 Dec;29(12):2802-13
pubmed: 25336713
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):420-429
pubmed: 32975887
Prenat Diagn. 2022 May;42(6):796-803
pubmed: 35583085
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):52-61
pubmed: 34411415