Training and proficiency level in endoscopic sinus surgery change residents' eye movements.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2023
03 01 2023
Historique:
received:
13
07
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
entrez:
3
1
2023
pubmed:
4
1
2023
medline:
6
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nose surgery is challenging and needs a lot of training for safe and efficient treatments. Eye tracking can provide an objective assessment to measure residents' learning curve. The aim of the current study was to assess residents' fixation duration and other dependent variables over the course of a dedicated training in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Sixteen residents performed a FESS training over 18 sessions, split into three surgical steps. Eye movements in terms of percent fixation on the screen and average fixation duration were measured, in addition to residents' completion time, cognitive load, and surgical performance. Results indicated performance improvements in terms of completion time and surgical performance. Cognitive load and average fixation duration showed a significant change within the last step of training. Percent fixation on screen increased within the first step, and then stagnated. Results showed that eye movements and cognitive load differed between residents of different proficiency levels. In conclusion, eye tracking is a helpful objective measuring tool in FESS. It provides additional insights of the training level and changes with increasing performance. Expert-like gaze was obtained after half of the training sessions and increased proficiency in FESS was associated with increased fixation duration.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36596830
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25518-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-25518-2
pmc: PMC9810736
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
79Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Kennedy, D. W. & Senior, B. A. Endoscopic sinus surgery: A review. Adv. Sinus Nasal Surg. 30(3), 313–329 (1997).
Bakker, N. H., Fokkens, W. J. & Grimbergen, C. A. Investigation of training needs for functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Rhinology 43(104–108), 104–108 (2005).
Liversedge, S. P. & Findlay, J. M. Saccadic eye movements and cognition. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(1), 6–14 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01418-7
Gegenfurtner, K. R. The interaction between vision and eye movements. Perception 45(12), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006616657097 (2016).
doi: 10.1177/0301006616657097
Kowler, E. Eye movements: The past 25 years. Vision Res. 51, 1457–1483 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.014
Land, M., Mennie, N. & Rusted, J. The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28(11), 1311–1328 (1999).
doi: 10.1068/p2935
de Brouwer, A. J., Flanagan, J. R. & Spering, M. Functional use of eye movements for an acting system. Trends Cogn. Sci. 25(3), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.006 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.006
Crawford, J. D., Medendorp, W. P. & Marotta, J. J. Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J. Neurophysiol. 92(1), 10–19 (2004).
doi: 10.1152/jn.00117.2004
Buneo, C. A. & Andersen, R. A. The posterior parietal cortex: Sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44(13), 2594–2606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2005.10.011 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2005.10.011
Tien, T. et al. Eye tracking for skills assessment and training: A systematic review. J. Surg. Res. 191(1), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.032 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.04.032
Wilson, M. et al. Psychomotor control in a virtual laparoscopic surgery training environment: Gaze control parameters differentiate novices from experts. Surg. Endosc. 24(10), 2458–2464. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-010-0986-1/ (2010).
doi: 10.1007/S00464-010-0986-1/
Wilson, M. R. et al. Perceptual impairment and psychomotor control in virtual laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 25, 2268–2274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1546-4 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1546-4
Anschuetz, L. et al. Comparison of 3-versus 2-dimensional endoscopy using eye tracking and assessment of cognitive load among surgeons performing endoscopic ear surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 145(9), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1765 (2019).
doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.1765
Eivazi, S. et al. Optimal eye movement strategies: A comparison of neurosurgeons gaze patterns when using a surgical microscope. Acta Neurochir. 159(6), 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3185-1 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3185-1
Ahmidi, N., Ishii, M., Fichtinger, G., Gallia, G. L. & Hager, G. D. An objective and automated method for assessing surgical skill in endoscopic sinus surgery using eye-tracking and tool-motion data. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2(6), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21053 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/alr.21053
Wilson, M. R. et al. Gaze training enhances laparoscopic technical skill acquisition and multi-tasking performance: A randomized, controlled study. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. 25(12), 3731–3739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1802-2 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1802-2
Chetwood, A. S. A. et al. Collaborative eye tracking: A potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 26(7), 2003–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2143-x (2012).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2143-x
Feng, Y. et al. Virtual pointer for gaze guidance in laparoscopic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 34(8), 3533–3539. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00464-019-07141-X (2020).
doi: 10.1007/S00464-019-07141-X
Kassner M, Patera W, Bulling A. Pupil: An open source platform for pervasive eye tracking and mobile gaze-based interaction. UbiComp 2014—Adjun Proc 2014 ACM Int Jt Conf Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. 2014:1151–1160 https://doi.org/10.1145/2638728.2641695
Hart, S. G. & Staveland, L. E. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index). Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9 (1988).
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Niederhauser, L., Fink, R., Mast, F. W., Caversaccio, M. & Anschuetz, L. Video learning of surgical procedures: A randomized comparison of microscopic, 2- and 3-dimensional endoscopic ear surgery techniques. Otol. Neurotol. 43(7), e746–e752. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003550 (2022).
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003550
Dias, R. D., Ngo-Howard, M. C., Boskovski, M. T., Zenati, M. A. & Yule, S. J. Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons’ intraoperative cognitive workload. Br. J. Surg. 105(5), 491–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10795 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10795
Martin, J. A. et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br. J. Surg. 84(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800840237 (1997).
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800840237
Laeeq, K. et al. In-training assessment and predictors of competency in endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 120(12), 2540–2545. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21134 (2010).
doi: 10.1002/lary.21134
Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C. & Leaf, P. J. Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?. Int. J .Methods Psychiatr. Res. 20(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/MPR.329 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/MPR.329
Van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J. Stat. Softw. 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03 (2011).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v045.i03
Rawlings, A. M. et al. Multiple imputation of cognitive performance as a repeatedly measured outcome. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 32(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10654-016-0197-8 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/S10654-016-0197-8
White, I. R., Royston, P. & Wood, A. M. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat. Med. 30(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.4067 (2011).
doi: 10.1002/SIM.4067
Quené, H. & Van Den Bergh, H. On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial. Speech Commun. 43(1–2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPECOM.2004.02.004 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/J.SPECOM.2004.02.004
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 6(82), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 (2017).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
RC Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.1.0 [software]. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. 2021 May 18. [cited 2022 Apr 4; downloaded 2021 June 5]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. (Erlbaum, 1988).
Vine, S. J., Chaytor, R. J., McGrath, J. S., Masters, R. S. W. & Wilson, M. R. Gaze training improves the retention and transfer of laparoscopic technical skills in novices. Surg. Endosc. 27(9), 3205–3213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2893-8 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2893-8
Fried, M. P. et al. Construct validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator. Arch. Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 133(4), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHOTOL.133.4.350 (2007).
doi: 10.1001/ARCHOTOL.133.4.350
Burge, S. D., Bunegin, L., Weitzel, E. K. & McMains, K. C. The validation of an endoscopic sinus surgery skills training model: A pilot study. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy. 26(5), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3798 (2012).
doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3798
Ogino-Nishimura, E., Nakagawa, T., Sakamoto, T. & Ito, J. An endoscopic endonasal surgery training model using quail eggs. Laryngoscope. 122(10), 2154–2157. https://doi.org/10.1002/LARY.23399 (2012).
doi: 10.1002/LARY.23399
Vine, S. J., Masters, R. S. W., McGrath, J. S., Bright, E. & Wilson, M. R. Cheating experience: Guiding novices to adopt the gaze strategies of experts expedites the learning of technical laparoscopic skills. Surgery 152(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURG.2012.02.002 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/J.SURG.2012.02.002
Tien, T. et al. Differences in gaze behaviour of expert and junior surgeons performing open inguinal hernia repair. Surg. Endosc. Other Interv. Tech. 29(2), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3683-7 (2015).
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3683-7
Khan, N., Abboudi, H., Khan, M. S., Dasgupta, P. & Ahmed, K. Measuring the surgical “learning curve”: Methods, variables and competency. BJU Int. 113(3), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJU.12197 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/BJU.12197
Moulton, C. A. E., Regehr, G., Mylopoulos, M. & MacRae, H. M. Slowing down when you should: A new model of expert judgment. Acad. Med. 82(10 Suppl), S109–S116. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0B013E3181405A76 (2007).
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0B013E3181405A76
Moulton, C. A., Regehr, G., Lingard, L., Merritt, C. & MacRae, H. Slowing down to stay out of trouble in the operating room: Remaining attentive in automaticity. Acad. Med. 85(10), 1571–1577. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f073dd (2010).
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f073dd
Harvey, A., Vickers, J. N., Snelgrove, R., Scott, M. F. & Morrison, S. Expert surgeon’s quiet eye and slowing down: Expertise differences in performance and quiet eye duration during identification and dissection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Am. J. Surg. 207(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.033 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.033
Causer, J., Harvey, A., Snelgrove, R., Arsenault, G. & Vickers, J. N. Quiet eye training improves surgical knot tying more than traditional technical training: A randomized controlled study. Am. J. Surg. 208(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2013.12.042 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/J.AMJSURG.2013.12.042
Haider, H. & Frensch, P. A. Eye movement during skill acquisition: More evidence for the information-reduction hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25(1), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172 (1999).
doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172