Genome assemblies and comparison of two Neotropical spiral gingers: Costus pulverulentus and C. lasius.

genome resources herbaceous monocot synteny tropical plant

Journal

The Journal of heredity
ISSN: 1465-7333
Titre abrégé: J Hered
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 05 2023
Historique:
received: 22 02 2023
accepted: 15 03 2023
medline: 29 5 2023
pubmed: 18 3 2023
entrez: 17 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The spiral gingers (Costus L.) are a pantropical genus of herbaceous perennial monocots; the Neotropical clade of Costus radiated rapidly in the past few million years into over 60 species. The Neotropical spiral gingers have a rich history of evolutionary and ecological research that can motivate and inform modern genetic investigations. Here, we present the first 2 chromosome-level genome assemblies in the genus, for C. pulverulentus and C. lasius, and briefly compare their synteny. We assembled the C. pulverulentus genome from a combination of short-read data, Chicago and Dovetail Hi-C chromatin-proximity sequencing, and alignment with a linkage map. We annotated the genome by mapping a C. pulverulentus transcriptome and querying mapped transcripts against a protein database. We assembled the C. lasius genome with Pacific Biosciences HiFi long reads and alignment to the C. pulverulentus genome. These 2 assemblies are the first published genomes for non-cultivated tropical plants. These genomes solidify the spiral gingers as a model system and will facilitate research on the poorly understood genetic basis of tropical plant diversification.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36928286
pii: 7078863
doi: 10.1093/jhered/esad018
pmc: PMC10212132
doi:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.cfxpnvx94']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

286-293

Informations de copyright

© The American Genetic Association. 2023.

Références

Plant Cell. 2000 May;12(5):617-36
pubmed: 10810139
New Phytol. 2010 Jul;187(2):521-541
pubmed: 20456055
Mol Ecol. 2022 Aug;31(16):4351-4363
pubmed: 34487383
Evolution. 2006 Mar;60(3):538-52
pubmed: 16637499
J Hered. 2021 Mar 29;112(2):174-183
pubmed: 33595645
Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:331-68
pubmed: 18076328
Am Nat. 2022 Apr;199(4):576-583
pubmed: 35324380
Bioinformatics. 2020 May 1;36(9):2896-2898
pubmed: 31971576
Genome Biol. 2019 Oct 28;20(1):224
pubmed: 31661016
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 15;34(18):3094-3100
pubmed: 29750242
Oecologia. 1984 Apr;62(1):31-36
pubmed: 28310734
Genome Res. 2016 Mar;26(3):342-50
pubmed: 26848124
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Apr;10(2):116-22
pubmed: 17291819
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:241-59
pubmed: 17506661
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D258-61
pubmed: 14681407
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;33(6):427-440
pubmed: 29731154
Evolution. 2008 Oct;62(10):2628-42
pubmed: 18637960
Am J Bot. 2005 Nov;92(11):1899-910
pubmed: 21646107
Am J Bot. 2022 Aug;109(8):1262-1272
pubmed: 35862815
Evolution. 2020 Dec;74(12):2644-2661
pubmed: 33047821
Mol Ecol Resour. 2020 Mar;20(2):591-604
pubmed: 31628884
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e152
pubmed: 17550304
Trop Plant Biol. 2012 Mar;5(1):88-94
pubmed: 22523606
Database (Oxford). 2013 May 23;2013:bat035
pubmed: 23707967
Genome Biol. 2020 Sep 14;21(1):245
pubmed: 32928274
Annu Rev Biochem. 1984;53:163-94
pubmed: 6383193
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D1028-35
pubmed: 25392413
Mol Ecol. 2013 Oct;22(19):4931-42
pubmed: 23952304
Genomics Inform. 2012 Dec;10(4):226-33
pubmed: 23346034
Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):101-8
pubmed: 21186351
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Sep 27;38(10):4647-4654
pubmed: 34320186
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5654-66
pubmed: 14500829
Evolution. 1983 May;37(3):523-539
pubmed: 28563306
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jul 1;34(7):1812-1819
pubmed: 28387841
Sex Plant Reprod. 2009 Dec;22(4):247-55
pubmed: 20033446
Ecology. 2015 Feb;96(2):440-9
pubmed: 26240865
Genomics Inform. 2014 Sep;12(3):87-97
pubmed: 25317107
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 4;6:e4958
pubmed: 29888139
New Phytol. 2022 Nov;236(4):1572-1583
pubmed: 36068995
AoB Plants. 2021 Dec 02;14(1):plab073
pubmed: 35035869
Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):93-103
pubmed: 12188051
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):170-175
pubmed: 33526886
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52967
pubmed: 23308128
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 15;29(8):1072-5
pubmed: 23422339
New Phytol. 2023 Feb;237(4):1432-1445
pubmed: 36375492

Auteurs

Julia Harenčár (J)

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.

Oscar M Vargas (OM)

Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA, United States.

Merly Escalona (M)

Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.

Douglas W Schemske (DW)

Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

Kathleen M Kay (KM)

Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, United States.

Articles similaires

Genome Size Genome, Plant Magnoliopsida Evolution, Molecular Arabidopsis
Genome, Plant Medicago sativa Crops, Agricultural Genomics Polyploidy

Fine mapping of a major QTL, qECQ8, for rice taste quality.

Shan Zhu, Guoping Tang, Zhou Yang et al.
1.00
Oryza Quantitative Trait Loci Taste Chromosome Mapping Phenotype
Arabidopsis Amorphophallus Plants, Genetically Modified Phylogeny Droughts

Classifications MeSH