Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and phylogenomic analysis of Elaeocarpaceae.

Phylogeny Genome, Chloroplast / genetics Elaeocarpaceae / genetics Ecosystem Chloroplasts / genetics
Chloroplast genome Divergence time Elaeocarpus Phylogenomic

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 13 10 2022
accepted: 10 04 2023
medline: 17 5 2023
pubmed: 16 5 2023
entrez: 15 5 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Elaeocarpaceae is a vital family in tropical and subtropical forests. Compared with the important position of Elaeocarpaceae species in forest ecosystem and the concern of medicinal value, the most research on Elaeocarpaceae are classification and taxonomy. Molecular systematics has corrected the morphological misjudgment, and it belongs to Oxalidales. Phylogenetic and divergence time estimates of Elaeocarpaceae is mostly constructed by using chloroplast gene fragments. At present, although there are reports on the chloroplast structure of Elaeocarpaceae, a comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast structure of Elaeocarpaceae is lacking. To understand the variation in chloroplast sequence size and structure in Elaeocarpaceae, the chloroplast genomes of nine species were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform and further assembled and annotated with The results revealed the following: (a) The 11 sequenced chloroplast genomes ranged in size from 157,546 to 159,400 bp. (b) The chloroplast genomes of

Sections du résumé

Background
Elaeocarpaceae is a vital family in tropical and subtropical forests. Compared with the important position of Elaeocarpaceae species in forest ecosystem and the concern of medicinal value, the most research on Elaeocarpaceae are classification and taxonomy. Molecular systematics has corrected the morphological misjudgment, and it belongs to Oxalidales. Phylogenetic and divergence time estimates of Elaeocarpaceae is mostly constructed by using chloroplast gene fragments. At present, although there are reports on the chloroplast structure of Elaeocarpaceae, a comprehensive analysis of the chloroplast structure of Elaeocarpaceae is lacking.
Methods
To understand the variation in chloroplast sequence size and structure in Elaeocarpaceae, the chloroplast genomes of nine species were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform and further assembled and annotated with
Results
The results revealed the following: (a) The 11 sequenced chloroplast genomes ranged in size from 157,546 to 159,400 bp. (b) The chloroplast genomes of

Identifiants

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15322 PMID: 37187516 PMC: PMC10178313
pubmed: 37187516
doi: 10.7717/peerj.15322
pii: 15322
pmc: PMC10178313
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e15322

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Wang et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Nat Methods. 2012 Jul 30;9(8):772
pubmed: 22847109
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 Jan 31;8:36
pubmed: 18237435
New Phytol. 2015 Jul;207(2):437-453
pubmed: 25615647
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24670
pubmed: 21931804
Plant Mol Biol. 2011 Jul;76(3-5):273-97
pubmed: 21424877
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021 Feb 15;6(2):555-556
pubmed: 33628926
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
pubmed: 14530136
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(3):374-81
pubmed: 22403032
Bioinformatics. 2015 Oct 15;31(20):3350-2
pubmed: 26099265
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul 1;32(Web Server issue):W273-9
pubmed: 15215394
Syst Biol. 2007 Aug;56(4):564-77
pubmed: 17654362
Syst Biol. 2008 Oct;57(5):758-71
pubmed: 18853362
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 15;26(20):2620-1
pubmed: 20736339
Virus Evol. 2018 Jun 08;4(1):vey016
pubmed: 29942656
J Mol Evol. 2010 Feb;70(2):149-66
pubmed: 20091301
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W575-81
pubmed: 23609545
Syst Biol. 2022 Feb 10;71(2):301-319
pubmed: 33983440
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 5;11(10):e0162907
pubmed: 27706173
Am J Bot. 2012 Feb;99(2):e84-7
pubmed: 22282110
Am J Bot. 2021 Jul;108(7):1181-1200
pubmed: 34278558
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Jan 06;8(2):345-63
pubmed: 26739167
Genome Biol. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):241
pubmed: 32912315
Plant Methods. 2019 May 21;15:50
pubmed: 31139240
Plant J. 2006 Apr;46(1):85-94
pubmed: 16553897
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 29;15:293
pubmed: 25176396
J Plant Res. 2013 Nov;126(6):763-74
pubmed: 23748372
Bioinformatics. 2018 Sep 1;34(17):3030-3031
pubmed: 29659705
Gene. 2013 Oct 10;528(2):120-31
pubmed: 23900198
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Feb 05;15:40
pubmed: 25652741
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol Evol. 2020 Oct 1;12(10):1841-1857
pubmed: 32722748
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Sep 1;9(9):2354-2364
pubmed: 28957463
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20
pubmed: 11674868
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Feb;25(2):393-401
pubmed: 18056074
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0142215
pubmed: 26558895
BMC Evol Biol. 2008 May 01;8:130
pubmed: 18452621
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Nov;45(2):547-63
pubmed: 17644003
Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2021 Feb 12;6(2):557-559
pubmed: 33628927
Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):337-9
pubmed: 2250706
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Nov 08;7:214
pubmed: 17996036
Appl Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 09;4(2):
pubmed: 26949577
Bioinformatics. 2008 Mar 1;24(5):715-6
pubmed: 18227120
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Jul;52(1):115-24
pubmed: 19166950
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9794-8
pubmed: 7937893
BMC Biol. 2021 Oct 29;19(1):232
pubmed: 34711223
Gene. 2013 Nov 10;530(2):229-35
pubmed: 23973725
J Comput Biol. 2012 May;19(5):455-77
pubmed: 22506599
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Aug 9;113(32):9045-50
pubmed: 27450087
Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
pubmed: 12912839
DNA Res. 2004 Aug 31;11(4):247-61
pubmed: 15500250
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 04;12:638580
pubmed: 34149746
Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Dec;31(12):3095-112
pubmed: 25172958
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Sep;22(9):1813-22
pubmed: 15930156
BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Oct 24;7:57
pubmed: 17956636
Plant Cell. 2001 Mar;13(3):645-58
pubmed: 11251102
Am J Bot. 2006 Sep;93(9):1328-42
pubmed: 21642198
Curr Genet. 2009 Jun;55(3):323-37
pubmed: 19449185
BMC Evol Biol. 2006 Oct 04;6:77
pubmed: 17020608
Syst Biol. 2012 Oct;61(5):823-34
pubmed: 22357726
Plants (Basel). 2021 Jun 17;10(6):
pubmed: 34204211
PeerJ. 2016 Sep 06;4:e2402
pubmed: 27651991
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jul;8(4):867-9
pubmed: 21585915
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Oct 23;10:321
pubmed: 20969798
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;18(2):100-6
pubmed: 17169550
Plant Cell. 2013 May;25(5):1541-54
pubmed: 23653472

Auteurs

Yihui Wang (Y)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, P.R. China.

Yifei Xie (Y)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.
Key Laboratory of Nanling Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Jiayi Jin (J)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Jinyue Li (J)

Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xishuangbanna, P.R. China.

Xiangdong Qiu (X)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Yang Tong (Y)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Zhongyang Li (Z)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.
Key Laboratory of Nanling Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Zhixiang Zhang (Z)

School of Ecology and Nature conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, P.R. China.

Wenling Lai (W)

School of Life Sciences, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou, P.R. China.
Key Laboratory of Nanling Plant Resources Conservation and Utilization, Ganzhou, P.R. China.

Articles similaires

Comprehensive comparative analysis and development of molecular markers for Lasianthus species based on complete chloroplast genome sequences.

Yue Zhang, Meifang Song, Deying Tang et al.
1.00
Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Decoding the genomic terrain: functional insights into 14 chemosensory proteins in whitefly Bemisia tabaci Asia II-1.

M N Rudra Gouda, Sabtharishi Subramanian
1.00
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides

Multiple NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductases from Lycoris radiata involved in Amaryllidaceae alkaloids biosynthesis.

Yuqing Wu, Yifeng Zhang, Haitong Fan et al.
1.00
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins

Systematical characterization of Rab7 gene family in Gossypium and potential functions of GhRab7B3-A gene in drought tolerance.

Mengyuan Yan, Zhiwei Dong, Tian Pan et al.
1.00
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Sciences de l'information › Phylogenèse › Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and...
questionsmedicales.fr › Phénomènes génétiques › Structures génétiques › Génome › Génome plastidique › Génome de chloroplaste › Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and...
questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Viridiplantae › Streptophyta › Embryophyta › Tracheobionta › Magnoliopsida › Elaeocarpaceae › Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Environnement › Écosystème › Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and...
questionsmedicales.fr › Cellules › Structures cellulaires › Espace intracellulaire › Cytoplasme › Structures cytoplasmiques › Organites › Plastes › Chloroplastes › Comparison of the chloroplast genomes and...