Segregation between breeds and local breed proportions in genetic and genomic models for crossbreds.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jul 2023
Historique:
received: 26 10 2022
accepted: 04 05 2023
medline: 7 7 2023
pubmed: 6 7 2023
entrez: 5 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The breeding value of a crossbred individual can be expressed as the sum of the contributions from each of the contributing pure breeds. In theory, the breeding value should account for segregation between breeds, which results from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds, which in turn is caused by differences in allele frequencies between breeds. However, with multiple generations of crossbreeding, how to account for breed segregation in genomic models that split the breeding value of crossbreds based on breed origin of alleles (BOA) is not known. Furthermore, local breed proportions (LBP) have been modelled based on BOA and is a concept related to breed segregation. The objectives of this study were to explore the theoretical background of the effect of LBP and how it relates to breed segregation and to investigate how to incorporate breed segregation (co)variance in genomic BOA models. We showed that LBP effects result from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds in an additive genetic model, i.e. breed segregation effects. We found that the (co)variance structure for BS effects in genomic BOA models does not lead to relationship matrices that are positive semi-definite in all cases. However, by setting one breed as a reference breed, a valid (co)variance structure can be constructed by including LBP effects for all other breeds and assuming them to be correlated. We successfully estimated variance components for a genomic BOA model with LBP effects in a simulated example. Breed segregation effects and LBP effects are two alternative ways to account for the contribution of differences in the mean effects of loci between breeds. When the covariance between LBP effects across breeds is included in the model, a valid (co)variance structure for LBP effects can be constructed by setting one breed as reference breed and fitting an LBP effect for each of the other breeds.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The breeding value of a crossbred individual can be expressed as the sum of the contributions from each of the contributing pure breeds. In theory, the breeding value should account for segregation between breeds, which results from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds, which in turn is caused by differences in allele frequencies between breeds. However, with multiple generations of crossbreeding, how to account for breed segregation in genomic models that split the breeding value of crossbreds based on breed origin of alleles (BOA) is not known. Furthermore, local breed proportions (LBP) have been modelled based on BOA and is a concept related to breed segregation. The objectives of this study were to explore the theoretical background of the effect of LBP and how it relates to breed segregation and to investigate how to incorporate breed segregation (co)variance in genomic BOA models.
RESULTS RESULTS
We showed that LBP effects result from the difference in the mean contribution of loci between breeds in an additive genetic model, i.e. breed segregation effects. We found that the (co)variance structure for BS effects in genomic BOA models does not lead to relationship matrices that are positive semi-definite in all cases. However, by setting one breed as a reference breed, a valid (co)variance structure can be constructed by including LBP effects for all other breeds and assuming them to be correlated. We successfully estimated variance components for a genomic BOA model with LBP effects in a simulated example.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Breed segregation effects and LBP effects are two alternative ways to account for the contribution of differences in the mean effects of loci between breeds. When the covariance between LBP effects across breeds is included in the model, a valid (co)variance structure for LBP effects can be constructed by setting one breed as reference breed and fitting an LBP effect for each of the other breeds.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37407936
doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00810-5
pii: 10.1186/s12711-023-00810-5
pmc: PMC10320957
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

45

Subventions

Organisme : Ministeriet for Fø devarer, Landbrug og Fiskeri
ID : 34009-18-1365

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Aug 22;48(1):61
pubmed: 27549177
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jun 11;42:20
pubmed: 20540758
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Mar;105(3):2426-2438
pubmed: 35033341
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jul 8;51(1):38
pubmed: 31286857
Genetics. 2015 Jun;200(2):455-68
pubmed: 25873631
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Feb;93(2):743-52
pubmed: 20105546
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Nov;105(12):9822-9836
pubmed: 36307242
Genetics. 2020 Sep;216(1):27-41
pubmed: 32680885
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Oct 23;49(1):75
pubmed: 29061123
Front Genet. 2019 May 03;10:418
pubmed: 31130991
J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Feb;130(1):4-9
pubmed: 23317060
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
pubmed: 18946147
Genet Sel Evol. 2006 Nov-Dec;38(6):601-15
pubmed: 17129562
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 May 31;53(1):46
pubmed: 34058971
Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Dec;87(4):423-30
pubmed: 24190314
Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 1;25(5):680-1
pubmed: 19176551
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jun;105(6):5178-5191
pubmed: 35465992
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Apr 6;54(1):25
pubmed: 35387581
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Dec 03;44:37
pubmed: 23206367
J Anim Sci. 2011 Jul;89(7):2050-60
pubmed: 21297063
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jan 15;41:12
pubmed: 19284703
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Mar 25;46:23
pubmed: 24666469
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Dec 22;47:98
pubmed: 26694257
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jan 27;42:2
pubmed: 20105297
Genet Sel Evol. 2021 Nov 6;53(1):84
pubmed: 34742238

Auteurs

Jón H Eiríksson (JH)

Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. jonhjalti@lbhi.is.
Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Agricultural University of Iceland, 311, Borgarnes, Iceland. jonhjalti@lbhi.is.

Guosheng Su (G)

Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Ismo Strandén (I)

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), 31600, Jokioinen, Finland.

Ole F Christensen (OF)

Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Prevalence and implications of fragile X premutation screening in Thailand.

Areerat Hnoonual, Sunita Kaewfai, Chanin Limwongse et al.
1.00
Humans Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Thailand Male Female
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial
Genome, Bacterial Virulence Phylogeny Genomics Plant Diseases

Classifications MeSH