Genome-wide analysis highlights genetic admixture in exotic germplasm resources of Eucalyptus and unexpected ancestral genomic composition of interspecific hybrids.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
05
05
2023
accepted:
20
07
2023
medline:
10
8
2023
pubmed:
8
8
2023
entrez:
8
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Eucalyptus is an economically important genus comprising more than 890 species in different subgenera and sections. Approximately twenty species of subgenus Symphyomyrtus account for 95% of the world's planted eucalypts. Discrimination of closely related eucalypt taxa is challenging, consistent with their recent phylogenetic divergence and occasional hybridization in nature. Admixture, misclassification or mislabeling of Eucalyptus germplasm resources maintained as exotics have been suggested, although no reports are available. Moreover, hybrids with increased productivity and traits complementarity are planted worldwide, but little is known about their actual genomic ancestry. In this study we examined a set of 440 trees of 16 different Eucalyptus species and 44 interspecific hybrids of multi-species origin conserved in germplasm banks in Brazil. We used genome-wide SNP data to evaluate the agreement between the alleged phylogenetic classification of species and provenances as registered in their historical records, and their observed genetic clustering derived from SNP data. Genetic structure analyses correctly assigned each of the 16 species to a different cluster although the PCA positioning of E. longirostrata was inconsistent with its current taxonomy. Admixture was present for closely related species' materials derived from local germplasm banks, indicating unintended hybridization following germplasm introduction. Provenances could be discriminated for some species, indicating that SNP-based discrimination was directly proportional to geographical distance, consistent with an isolation-by-distance model. SNP-based genomic ancestry analysis showed that the majority of the hybrids displayed realized genomic composition deviating from the expected ones based on their pedigree records, consistent with admixture in their parents and pervasive genome-wide directional selection toward the fast-growing E. grandis genome. SNP data in support of tree breeding provide precise germplasm identity verification, and allow breeders to objectively recognize the actual ancestral origin of superior hybrids to more realistically guide the program toward the development of the desired genetic combinations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37552668
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289536
pii: PONE-D-23-13755
pmc: PMC10409294
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0289536Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 de Oliveira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Mol Ecol Resour. 2018 Jan;18(1):176-177
pubmed: 28921901
Mol Ecol. 2013 Jun;22(11):3165-78
pubmed: 23110526
Bioinformatics. 2019 Feb 1;35(3):526-528
pubmed: 30016406
Evol Appl. 2019 Feb 12;12(4):845-860
pubmed: 30976314
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Mar;17(2):142-152
pubmed: 27860289
Plant Methods. 2010 Jun 30;6:16
pubmed: 20587069
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 May;16(3):608-27
pubmed: 26856252
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Dec;1(3-4):273-80
pubmed: 19083773
New Phytol. 2015 Nov;208(3):830-45
pubmed: 26079595
Genetics. 1964 Apr;49(4):561-76
pubmed: 17248204
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Dec;105:63-85
pubmed: 27530705
New Phytol. 2008;179(4):911-929
pubmed: 18537893
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 18;13(10):e0206085
pubmed: 30335843
Trends Genet. 2013 Apr;29(4):190-6
pubmed: 23428114
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013 Dec;69(3):704-16
pubmed: 23876290
Mol Ecol. 2019 Dec;28(24):5232-5247
pubmed: 31647597
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 24;14(6):e0218747
pubmed: 31233563
Am J Bot. 2008 Mar;95(3):368-80
pubmed: 21632361
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1378-90
pubmed: 25678438
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):27-32
pubmed: 26850166
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1527-40
pubmed: 25684350
Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(4):697-707
pubmed: 17284205
Mol Ecol. 2021 Feb;30(3):625-638
pubmed: 32881106
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Aug;121(2):126-141
pubmed: 29632325
Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2090:67-86
pubmed: 31975164
Bioinformatics. 2010 Feb 1;26(3):419-20
pubmed: 20080509
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 15;28(2):298-9
pubmed: 22110245
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genetics. 2014 Jun;197(2):573-89
pubmed: 24700103
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2011 Apr;59(1):206-24
pubmed: 21310251