Native diversity buffers against severity of non-native tree invasions.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
02
11
2022
accepted:
14
07
2023
medline:
29
9
2023
pubmed:
24
8
2023
entrez:
23
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Determining the drivers of non-native plant invasions is critical for managing native ecosystems and limiting the spread of invasive species
Identifiants
pubmed: 37612513
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06440-7
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-06440-7
pmc: PMC10533391
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
773-781Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Pyšek, P. et al. Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol. Rev. 95, 1511–1534 (2020).
pubmed: 32588508
Pejchar, L. & Mooney, H. A. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 497–504 (2009).
pubmed: 19577817
Richardson, D. M., Hui, C., Nuñez, M. A. & Pauchard, A. Tree invasions: patterns, processes, challenges and opportunities. Biol. Invasions 16, 473–481 (2014).
Richardson, D. M. & Rejmánek, M. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species–a global review. Divers. Distrib. 17, 788–809 (2011).
Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ (2022).
van Kleunen, M. et al. The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100, e02542 (2019).
pubmed: 30341991
Liang, J. et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354, aaf8957 (2016).
pubmed: 27738143
Vitousek, P. M., D’Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., Rejmanek, M. & Westbrooks, R. Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N. Z. J. Ecol. 21, 1–16 (1997).
Butchart, S. H. et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010).
pubmed: 20430971
Early, R. et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat. Commun. 7, 12485 (2016).
pubmed: 27549569
pmcid: 4996970
Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F. & Marchetti, M. P. Invasion Ecology 2nd edn (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
DiTomaso, J. M. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci. 48, 255–265 (2000).
Simberloff, D. We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. Biol. Invasions 11, 149–157 (2008).
Mack, R. N. et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10, 689–710 (2000).
Boyd, I. L., Freer-Smith, P. H., Gilligan, C. A. & Godfray, H. C. The consequence of tree pests and diseases for ecosystem services. Science 342, 1235773 (2013).
pubmed: 24233727
Vitousek, P. M., D’Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L. & Westbrooks, R. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84, 468–478 (1996).
Diagne, C. et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592, 571–576 (2021).
pubmed: 33790468
Nunez, M. A. et al. Exotic mammals disperse exotic fungi that promote invasion by exotic trees. PLoS ONE 8, e66832 (2013).
pubmed: 23826154
pmcid: 3691272
Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns. New Phytol. 196, 383–396 (2012).
pubmed: 22943470
Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geog. 30, 409–431 (2006).
Seabloom, E. W. et al. Human impacts, plant invasion, and imperiled plant species in California. Ecol. Appl. 16, 1338–1350 (2006).
pubmed: 16937802
Dayton, P. K. in Proc. Colloquium on Conservation Problems in Antarctica (ed. Parker, B. C.) 81–96 (Allen Press, 1972).
Beaury, E. M., Finn, J. T., Corbin, J. D., Barr, V. & Bradley, B. A. Biotic resistance to invasion is ubiquitous across ecosystems of the United States. Ecol. Lett. 23, 476–482 (2020).
pubmed: 31875651
Cadotte, M. W., Campbell, S. E., Li, S.-P., Sodhi, D. S. & Mandrak, N. E. Preadaptation and naturalization of nonnative species: Darwin’s two fundamental insights into species invasion. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 661–684 (2018).
pubmed: 29489400
Fridley, J. et al. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88, 3–17 (2007).
pubmed: 17489447
Funk, J. L. The physiology of invasive plants in low-resource environments. Conserv. Physiol. 1, cot026 (2013).
pubmed: 27293610
pmcid: 4806624
Nuñez, M. A. & Dickie, I. A. Invasive belowground mutualists of woody plants. Biol. Invasions 16, 645–661 (2014).
van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010).
pubmed: 20002494
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. in Biological Invasions (ed. Nentwig, W.) 97–125 (Springer, 2007).
Dickie, I. A. et al. The emerging science of linked plant–fungal invasions. New Phytol. 215, 1314–1332 (2017).
pubmed: 28649741
Diez, J. M., Sullivan, J. J., Hulme, P. E., Edwards, G. & Duncan, R. P. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol. Lett. 11, 674–681 (2008).
pubmed: 18400019
Ma, C. et al. Different effects of invader–native phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: a meta-analysis of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, 20160663 (2016).
pubmed: 27605502
pmcid: 5031649
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers. Distrib. 15, 22–40 (2009).
Levine, J. M. & D’Antonio, C. M. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87, 15–26 (1999).
Tilman, D. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78, 81–92 (1997).
Fine, P. V. The invasibility of tropical forests by exotic plants. J. Trop. Ecol. 18, 687–705 (2002).
Elton, C. S. The Ecology of Invasion by Animals and Plants 1st edn (Methuen, 1958).
Kennedy, T. A. et al. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417, 636–638 (2002).
pubmed: 12050662
Mungi, N. A., Qureshi, Q. & Jhala, Y. V. Role of species richness and human impacts in resisting invasive species in tropical forests. J. Ecol. 109, 3308–3321 (2021).
Stohlgren, T. J., Jarnevich, C., Chong, G. W. & Evangelista, P. H. Scale and plant invasions: a theory of biotic acceptance. Preslia 78, 405–426 (2006).
Zeiter, M. & Stampfli, A. Positive diversity–invasibility relationship in species-rich semi-natural grassland at the neighbourhood scale. Ann. Bot. 110, 1385–1393 (2012).
pubmed: 22956533
pmcid: 3489150
Zanne, A. E. et al. Functional biogeography of angiosperms: life at the extremes. New Phytol. 218, 1697–1709 (2018).
pubmed: 29603243
Kraft, N. J. et al. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct. Ecol. 29, 592–599 (2015).
Keddy, P. A. Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 3, 157–164 (1992).
Gallien, L., Carboni, M. & Münkemüller, T. Identifying the signal of environmental filtering and competition in invasion patterns–a contest of approaches from community ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1002–1011 (2014).
Divíšek, J. et al. Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nat. Commun. 9, 4631 (2018).
pubmed: 30401825
pmcid: 6219509
MacArthur, R. & Levins, R. The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am. Nat. 101, 377–385 (1967).
Park, D. S. & Potter, D. A test of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis in the thistle tribe shows that close relatives make bad neighbors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17915–17920 (2013).
pubmed: 24127587
pmcid: 3816436
Schaefer, H., Hardy, O. J., Silva, L., Barraclough, T. G. & Savolainen, V. Testing Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol. Lett. 14, 389–396 (2011).
pubmed: 21320262
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, 1859).
Hubbell, S. P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography (Princeton Univ. Press, 2001).
Pinto‐Ledezma, J. N. et al. Testing Darwin’s naturalization conundrum based on taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional dimensions of vascular plants. Ecol. Monogr. 90, e01420 (2020).
Theoharides, K. A. & Dukes, J. S. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 176, 256–273 (2007).
pubmed: 17822399
Hulme, P. E. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 10–18 (2009).
Simberloff, D. & Von Holle, B. Postitive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasion meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1, 21–23 (1999).
Pyšek, P., Křivánek, M. & Jarošík, V. Planting intensity, residence time, and species traits determine invasion success of alien woody species. Ecology 90, 2734–2744 (2009).
pubmed: 19886483
Rejmánek, M. Invasive trees and shrubs: where do they come from and what we should expect in the future? Biol. Invasions 16, 483–498 (2014).
Chong, K. Y. et al. Are terrestrial biological invasions different in the tropics? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 291–314 (2021).
Smith, J. L. & Perino, J. V. Osage orange (Maclura pomifera): history and economic uses. Econ. Bot. 35, 24–41 (1981).
Pyšek, P. et al. The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits. Divers. Distrib. 15, 891–903 (2009).
Svenning, J. C. et al. The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography 37, 1198–1209 (2014).
pubmed: 25722537
pmcid: 4338500
Amarasekare, P. & Simon, M. W. Latitudinal directionality in ectotherm invasion success. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20191411 (2020).
pubmed: 32075530
pmcid: 7031664
Park, D. S., Feng, X., Maitner, B. S., Ernst, K. C. & Enquist, B. J. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum can be explained by spatial scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10904–10910 (2020).
pubmed: 32366659
pmcid: 7245080
Tournadre, J. Anthropogenic pressure on the open ocean: The growth of ship traffic revealed by altimeter data analysis. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 7924–7932 (2014).
de Lima, R. A. F. et al. Making forest data fair and open. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 656–658 (2022).
pubmed: 35411093
Moles, A. T. et al. Invasions: the trail behind, the path ahead, and a test of a disturbing idea. J. Ecol. 100, 116–127 (2012).
Peng, S., Kinlock, N. L., Gurevitch, J. & Peng, S. Correlation of native and exotic species richness: a global meta‐analysis finds no invasion paradox across scales. Ecology 100, e02552 (2019).
pubmed: 30601574
Dickie, I. A. et al. Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol. Invasions 16, 705–719 (2014).
Finnoff, D., Shogren, J. F., Leung, B. & Lodge, D. Take a risk: preferring prevention over control of biological invaders. Ecol. Econ. 62, 216–222 (2007).
Bivand, R. & Piras, G. Comparing implementations of estimation methods for spatial econometrics. J. Stat. Softw. 63, 1–36 (2015).
Kalwij, J. M. Review of ‘The Plant List, a working list of all plant species’. J. Veg. Sci. 23, 998–1002 (2012).
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).
Beech, E., Rivers, M., Oldfield, S. & Smith, P. P. GlobalTreeSearch: the first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. J. Sustain. For. 36, 454–489 (2017).
Catford, J. A., Vesk, P. A., Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Quantifying levels of biological invasion: towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 44–62 (2012).
Guo, Q. et al. A unified approach for quantifying invasibility and degree of invasion. Ecology 96, 2613–2621 (2015).
pubmed: 26649383
Van Den Hoogen, J. et al. Soil nematode abundance and functional group composition at a global scale. Nature 572, 194–198 (2019).
pubmed: 31341281
Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).
pubmed: 31273120
Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 170122 (2017).
pubmed: 28872642
pmcid: 5584396
Stewart, S. et al. Climate extreme variables generated using monthly time‐series data improve predicted distributions of plant species. Ecography 44, 626–639 (2021).
Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12, e0169748 (2017).
pubmed: 28207752
pmcid: 5313206
Global Ports. All Layers and Tables (GLOBAL/GlobalPorts) https://gis.wfp.org/arcgis/rest/services/GLOBAL/GlobalPorts/MapServer/layers (2021).
Global Airports. The World Bank Data Catalog https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0038117 (2021).
Maynard, D. S. et al. Global relationships in tree functional traits. Nat. Commun. 13, 3185 (2022).
pubmed: 35676261
pmcid: 9177664
Joswig, J. S. et al. Climatic and soil factors explain the two-dimensional spectrum of global plant trait variation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 36–50 (2022).
pubmed: 34949824
Florczyk, A. J. et al. GHSL Data Package 2019: Public Release GHS P2019 (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2019).
Owen, N. R., Gumbs, R., Gray, C. L. & Faith, D. P. Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity. Nat. Commun. 10, 859 (2019).
pubmed: 30787282
pmcid: 6382770
Mazel, F. et al. Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably. Nat. Commun. 9, 2888 (2018).
pubmed: 30038259
pmcid: 6056549
Tucker, C. M. et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 92, 698–715 (2017).
pubmed: 26785932
Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V. PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).
Strauss, S. Y., Webb, C. O. & Salamin, N. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5841–5845 (2006).
pubmed: 16581902
pmcid: 1421337
Cazzolla Gatti, R. et al. The number of tree species on Earth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115329119 (2022).
pubmed: 35101981
pmcid: 8833151
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. in Biological Invasions (ed. Nentwig, W.) 97–125 (Springer, 2008).
Petchey, O. L. & Gaston, K. J. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 5, 402–411 (2002).
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).
pubmed: 30016406
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
Bittinger, K. Abdiv: Alpha and beta diversity measures. R package version 0.2.0 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/abdiv/index.html (2020).
Calaway, R., Analytics, R., Weston, S., Tenenbaum, D. & Calaway, M. doParallel: Foreach parallel adaptor for the ‘parallel’ package. R package version 1.0.17 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/doParallel/index.html (2015).
Microsoft & Weston, S. foreach: Provides foreach looping construct. R package version 1.5.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=foreach (2020).
Pearse, W. D. et al. Pez: phylogenetics for the environmental sciences. Bioinformatics 31, 2888–2890 (2015).
pubmed: 25948716
Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 24, 123–140 (1996).
Crase, B., Liedloff, A. C. & Wintle, B. A. A new method for dealing with residual spatial autocorrelation in species distribution models. Ecography 35, 879–888 (2012).
Portier, J., Gauthier, S., Robitaille, A. & Bergeron, Y. Accounting for spatial autocorrelation improves the estimation of climate, physical environment and vegetation’s effects on boreal forest’s burn rates. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 19–34 (2018).
pubmed: 31983808
Bjornstad, O. N. ncf: Spatial covariance functions. R package version 1.3-2 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ncf/index.html (2022).
Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. J., Gómez-Rubio, V. & Pebesma, E. J. Applied spatial data analysis with R (Springer, 2008).
Lundberg, S. M. et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2, 56–67 (2020).
pubmed: 32607472
pmcid: 7326367
Lundberg, S. M. & Lee, S.-I. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (eds Guyon, I. et al.) (NIPS, 2017).
Wright, M. N., Wager, S. & Probst, P. Ranger: A fast implementation of random forests. R package version 0.12 (2020).
Greenwell, B. fastshap: Fast approximate Shapley values. R package version 0.0.7 https://github.com/bgreenwell/fastshap (2020).
Roberts, D. R. et al. Cross‐validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40, 913–929 (2017).
Li, J. Assessing the accuracy of predictive models for numerical data: not r nor r
pubmed: 28837692
pmcid: 5570302
Platt, J. in Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, Vol. 10 (eds Smola, A. J. et al.) 61–74 (MIT Press, 1999).
Niculescu-Mizil, A. & Caruana, R. in Proc. 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning 625–632 (Association for Computing Machinery, 2005).
Meyer, H. & Pebesma, E. Predicting into unknown space? Estimating the area of applicability of spatial prediction models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1620–1633 (2021).
FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020: Main Report (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2020).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).
Kunzetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. & Christensen, R. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effect models. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 (2017).
Zeileis, A. et al. betareg: Beta regression. R package version 3.1-4 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/betareg/index.html (2021).
Wickham, H., Chang, W. & Wickham, M. H. ggplot2: Create elegant data visualisations using the grammar of graphics. R package version 2 https://search.r-project.org/CRAN/refmans/ggplot2/html/ggplot2-package.html (2016).