Chloroplast genomes of Eriobotrya elliptica and an unknown wild loquat "YN-1".
Chloroplast genome
Phylogeny
RNA editing
Wild loquat
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 08 2024
13 08 2024
Historique:
received:
07
04
2024
accepted:
09
08
2024
medline:
14
8
2024
pubmed:
14
8
2024
entrez:
13
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The chloroplast genomes of wild loquat can help to determine their place in the history of evolution. Here, we sequenced and assembled two novel wild loquat's chloroplast genomes, one is Eriobotrya elliptica, and the other is an unidentified wild loquat, which we named "YN-1". Their sizes are 159,471 bp and 159,399 bp, respectively. We also assembled a cultivated loquat named 'JFZ', its chloroplast genome size is 159,156 bp. A comparative study was conducted with six distinct species of loquats, including five wild loquats and one cultivated loquat. The results showed that both E. elliptica and "YN-1" have 127 genes, one gene more than E. fragrans, which is psbK. Regions trnF-GAA-ndhJ, petG-trnP-UGG, and rpl32-trnL-UAG were found to exhibit high variability. It was discovered that there was a positive selection on rpl22 and rps12. RNA editing analysis found several chilling stress-specific RNA editing sites, especially in rpl2 gene. Phylogenetic analysis results showed that "YN-1" is closely related to E. elliptica, E. obovata and E. henryi.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39138300
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69882-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-69882-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18816Subventions
Organisme : Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation Youth Project
ID : 2022J05254
Organisme : Putian University scientific research launch project
ID : 2022051
Organisme : Fujian Provincial University industry-university Cooperation project
ID : 2022N5006
Organisme : Putian University Putian City Science and Technology Plan Project
ID : 2021ZP09
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Menezes, A. P. A. et al. Chloroplast genomes of Byrsonima species (Malpighiaceae): Comparative analysis and screening of high divergence sequences. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–12 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20189-4
Lin, Z. et al. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes in Vasconcellea pubescens A.DC. and Carica papaya L. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–12 (2020).
Nock, C. J. et al. Chloroplast genome sequences from total DNA for plant identification. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9, 328–333 (2011).
pubmed: 20796245
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00558.x
Li, W., Zhang, C., Guo, X., Liu, Q. & Wang, K. Complete chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis. PLoS One 14, 1–18 (2019).
Amiryousefi, A., Hyvönen, J. & Poczai, P. The chloroplast genome sequence of bittersweet (Solanum dulcamara): Plastid genome structure evolution in Solanaceae. PLoS One 13, 1–23 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196069
Song, Y., Zhao, W., Xu, J., Li, M. F. & Zhang, Y. Chloroplast Genome Evolution and Species Identification of Styrax (Styracaceae). Biomed Res. Int. 2022, 1–13 (2022).
Gommans, W. M. & Mullen, S. P. RNA editing: A driving force for adaptive evolution?. BioEssays 31, 1137–1145 (2010).
doi: 10.1002/bies.200900045
Sasaki, T., Yukawa, Y., Miyamoto, T., Obokata, J. & Sugiura, M. Identification of RNA editing sites in chloroplast transcripts from the maternal and paternal progenitors of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): Comparative analysis shows the involvement of distinct trans-factors for ndhB editing. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 1028–1035 (2003).
pubmed: 12716996
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg098
Wang, W., Zhang, W., Wu, Y., Maliga, P. & Messing, J. RNA editing in chloroplasts of Spirodela polyrhiza, an aquatic monocotelydonous species. PLoS One 10, 1–13 (2015).
Chu, D. & Wei, L. Reduced C-to-U RNA editing rates might play a regulatory role in stress response of Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 244, 153081 (2020).
pubmed: 31783167
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.153081
Wang, Y. A draft genome, resequencing, and metabolomes reveal the genetic background and molecular basis of the nutritional and medicinal properties of loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl). Hortic. Res. 8, 1–18 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00657-1
Peng, Z. et al. Integration of genomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics identifies candidate loci underlying fruit weight in loquat. Hortic. Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhac037 (2022).
doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac037
pubmed: 37533673
pmcid: 10390855
Wang, Y. & Paterson, A. H. Loquat (Eriobotrya japonica (Thunb.) Lindl) population genomics suggests a two-staged domestication and identifies genes showing convergence/parallel selective sweeps with apple or peach. Plant J. 106, 942–952 (2021).
pubmed: 33624402
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15209
Su, W. et al. Polyploidy underlies co-option and diversification of biosynthetic triterpene pathways in the apple tribe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, 1–11 (2021).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101767118
Su, W. et al. Comprehensive metabolome and transcriptome analyses demonstrate divergent anthocyanin and carotenoid accumulation in fruits of wild and cultivated loquats. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1–16 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1285456
Qu, S. et al. Complete plastome of a subtropical tree Eriobotrya malipoensis (Rosaceae) in Yunnan. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4, 3534–3535 (2019).
pubmed: 33366073
pmcid: 7707364
doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1676680
Chen, S. F. et al. A new species of Eriobotrya (Rosaceae) from Yunnan province, China. PhytoKeys 146, 61–69 (2020).
pubmed: 32440252
pmcid: 7228930
doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.146.50728
Xu, J. et al. Whole chloroplast genome sequence of a subtropical tree Eriobotrya bengalensis (Rosaceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B Resour. 5, 697–698 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/23802359.2020.1714510
Yan, M. et al. The complete chloroplast genomes of Punica granatum and a comparison with other species in Lythraceae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2886 (2019).
pubmed: 31200508
pmcid: 6627765
doi: 10.3390/ijms20122886
Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The codon adaptation index-a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1281–1295 (1987).
pubmed: 3547335
pmcid: 340524
doi: 10.1093/nar/15.3.1281
Wright, F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene 87, 23–29 (1990).
pubmed: 2110097
doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9
Xiao, H. et al. A rice dual-localized pentatricopeptide repeat protein is involved in organellar RNA editing together with OsMORFs. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 2923–2936 (2018).
pubmed: 29562289
pmcid: 5972581
Jin, J. J. et al. GetOrganelle: A fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21, 1–31 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5
Shi, L. et al. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W65–W73 (2019).
pubmed: 31066451
pmcid: 6602467
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz345
Greiner, S., Lehwark, P. & Bock, R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: Expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W59–W64 (2019).
pubmed: 30949694
pmcid: 6602502
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz238
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).
pubmed: 23329690
pmcid: 3603318
doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).
pubmed: 29029172
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248
Rice, P., Longden, I. & Bleasby, A. EMBOSS: The European molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet. 16, 276–277 (2000).
pubmed: 10827456
doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2
Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W537–W544 (2018).
pubmed: 29790989
pmcid: 6030816
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379
Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M. & Dubchak, I. VISTA: Computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 273–279 (2004).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh458
Beier, S., Thiel, T., Münch, T., Scholz, U. & Mascher, M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics 33, 2583–2585 (2017).
pubmed: 28398459
pmcid: 5870701
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198
Kurtz, S. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 4633–4642 (2001).
pubmed: 11713313
pmcid: 92531
doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633
Zhang, Z. et al. ParaAT: A parallel tool for constructing multiple protein-coding DNA alignments. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 419, 779–781 (2012).
pubmed: 22390928
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.02.101
Zhang, Z. et al. KaKs_calculator: Calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics, Proteomics Bioinforma. 4, 259–263 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(07)60007-2
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G. M., Leek, J. T. & Salzberg, S. L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1650–1667 (2016).
pubmed: 27560171
pmcid: 5032908
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.095
Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).
pubmed: 31070718
pmcid: 6821337
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
Zhang, Z. H., Mayes, S. R., Vass, I., Nagy, L. & Barber, J. Characterization of the psbK locus of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in terms of photosystem II function. Photosynth. Res. 38, 369–377 (1993).
pubmed: 24317992
doi: 10.1007/BF00046763
Ahmad, W. et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis of threatened dragon trees Dracaena serrulata and Dracaena cinnabari. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–15 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20304-6
Vieira, L. D. N. et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Podocarpus lambertii: Genome structure, evolutionary aspects, gene content and SSR detection. PLoS One 9, 1–10 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090618
Martin, G., Baurens, F. C., Cardi, C., D’Hont, A. & Aury, J. M. The complete chloroplast genome of banana (Musa acuminata, Zingiberales): insight into plastid monocotyledon evolution. PLoS One 8, e67350 (2013).
pubmed: 23840670
pmcid: 3696114
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067350
Xu, S. et al. Chloroplast genomes of four Carex species: Long repetitive sequences trigger dramatic changes in chloroplast genome structure. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1–14 (2023).
Duan, Y., Cai, W. & Li, H. Chloroplast C-to-U RNA editing in vascular plants is adaptive due to its restorative effect: testing the restorative hypothesis. RNA 29, 141–152 (2023).
pubmed: 36649983
pmcid: 9891260
doi: 10.1261/rna.079450.122
Cui, X. et al. The RNA editing factor DUA1 is crucial to chloroplast development at low temperature in rice. New Phytol. 221, 834–849 (2019).
pubmed: 30295937
doi: 10.1111/nph.15448
Liu, X. et al. WSL5, a pentatricopeptide repeat protein, is essential for chloroplast biogenesis in rice under cold stress. J. Exp. Bot. 69, 3949–3961 (2018).
pubmed: 29893948
pmcid: 6054151
doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery214
Lan, J. et al. Young leaf white stripe encodes a P-type PPR protein required for chloroplast development. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 65, 1687–1702 (2023).
pubmed: 36897026
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13477
Xie, Y., Chan, P. L., Kwan, H. S. & Chang, J. The genome-wide characterization of alternative splicing and RNA editing in the development of Coprinopsis cinerea. J. Fungi 9, 915 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/jof9090915