Chromosome-level genome assemblies reveal genome evolution of an invasive plant Phragmites australis.
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2024
17 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
22
01
2024
accepted:
30
07
2024
medline:
18
8
2024
pubmed:
18
8
2024
entrez:
17
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Biological invasions pose a significant threat to ecosystems, disrupting local biodiversity and ecosystem functions. The genomic underpinnings of invasiveness, however, are still largely unknown, making it difficult to predict and manage invasive species effectively. The common reed (Phragmites australis) is a dominant grass species in wetland ecosystems and has become particularly invasive when transferred from Europe to North America. Here, we present a high-quality gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of Phragmites australis consisting of 24 pseudochromosomes and a B chromosome. Fully phased subgenomes demonstrated considerable subgenome dominance and revealed the divergence of diploid progenitors approximately 30.9 million years ago. Comparative genomics using chromosome-level scaffolds for three other lineages and a previously published draft genome assembly of an invasive lineage revealed that gene family expansions in the form of tandem duplications may have contributed to the invasiveness of the lineage. This study sheds light on the genome evolution of Arundinoideae grasses and suggests that genetic drivers, such as gene family expansions and tandem duplications, may underly the processes of biological invasion in plants. These findings provide a crucial step toward understanding and managing the genetic basis of invasiveness in plant species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39154094
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06660-1
pii: 10.1038/s42003-024-06660-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1007Subventions
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation)
ID : ZR2021QC119
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 32100304
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 31800299
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : U22A20558
Organisme : Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia)
ID : 319947
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cuthbert, R. N. et al. Global economic costs of aquatic invasive alien species. Sci. Total Environ. 775, 145238 (2021).
pubmed: 33715860
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145238
Obiri, J. F. Invasive plant species and their disaster-effects in dry tropical forests and rangelands of Kenya and Tanzania. J. Disaster Risk Stud. 3, 417–428 (2011).
Diagne, C. et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature 592, 571–576 (2021).
pubmed: 33790468
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
Seebens, H. et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017).
pubmed: 28198420
pmcid: 5316856
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14435
Roy, H. E. et al. IPBES Invasive Alien Species Assessment: Summary for Policymakers. https://zenodo.org/record/8314303 (2023).
Montesinos, D. Fast invasives fastly become faster: invasive plants align largely with the fast side of the plant economics spectrum. J. Ecol. 110, 1010–1014 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13616
Zhang, X., Oduor, A. M. & Liu, Y. Invasive plants have greater growth than co‐occurring natives in live soil subjected to a drought‐rewetting treatment. Funct. Ecol. 37, 513–522 (2023).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14244
Van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta‐analysis of trait differences between invasive and non‐invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010).
pubmed: 20002494
doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01418.x
Bieker, V. C. et al. Uncovering the genomic basis of an extraordinary plant invasion. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo5115 (2022).
pubmed: 36001672
pmcid: 9401624
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5115
Schrader, L. et al. Transposable element islands facilitate adaptation to novel environments in an invasive species. Nat. Commun. 5, 5495 (2014).
pubmed: 25510865
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6495
Moura, R. F., Queiroga, D., Vilela, E. & Moraes, A. P. Polyploidy and high environmental tolerance increase the invasive success of plants. J. Plant Res. 134, 105–114 (2021).
pubmed: 33155178
doi: 10.1007/s10265-020-01236-6
Leitch, A. & Leitch, I. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320, 481–483 (2008).
pubmed: 18436776
doi: 10.1126/science.1153585
Dubcovsky, J. & Dvorak, J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316, 1862–1866 (2007).
pubmed: 17600208
pmcid: 4737438
doi: 10.1126/science.1143986
Van de Peer, Y., Mizrachi, E. & Marchal, K. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 411–424 (2017).
pubmed: 28502977
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.26
Ren, Y. et al. Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of rhizoma phragmitis: a narrative review. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 28, 1127–1136 (2022).
pubmed: 35319074
pmcid: 8940586
doi: 10.1007/s11655-022-3572-1
Wang, C. et al. Transcriptome analysis of tetraploid and octoploid common reed (Phragmites australis). Front. Plant Sci. 12, 653183 (2021).
pubmed: 34025698
pmcid: 8132968
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.653183
Ren, L. et al. Intraspecific variation in Phragmites australis: clinal adaption of functional traits and phenotypic plasticity vary with latitude of origin. J. Ecol. 108, 2531–2543 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13401
Song, H. et al. Is there evidence of local adaptation of Phragmites australis to water level gradients and fluctuation frequencies? Sci. Total Environ. 756, 144065 (2021).
pubmed: 33310212
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144065
Zhu, X., Chen, G. & Zhang, C. Photosynthetic electron transport, photophosphorylation, and antioxidants in two ecotypes of reed (Phragmites communis Trin.) from different habitats. Photosynthetica 39, 183–189 (2001).
doi: 10.1023/A:1013766722604
Saltonstall, K. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2445–2449 (2002).
pubmed: 11854535
pmcid: 122384
doi: 10.1073/pnas.032477999
Wani, G. A. et al. Phenotypic variability and genetic diversity of Phragmites australis in Quebec and Kashmir reveal contrasting population structure. Plants 9, 1392 (2020).
pubmed: 33092113
pmcid: 7589717
doi: 10.3390/plants9101392
Facon, B. et al. A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 130–135 (2006).
pubmed: 16701488
doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.10.012
Lambertini, C. et al. Tracing the origin of Gulf Coast Phragmites (Poaceae): a story of long‐distance dispersal and hybridization. Am. J. Bot. 99, 538–551 (2012).
pubmed: 22334449
doi: 10.3732/ajb.1100396
Liu, L. L. et al. Cryptic lineages and potential introgression in a mixed‐ploidy species (Phragmites australis) across temperate China. J. Syst. Evol. 60, 398–410 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/jse.12672
Pyšek, P. et al. Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass. Ecology 99, 79–90 (2018).
pubmed: 29313970
doi: 10.1002/ecy.2068
Oh, D. H. et al. Novel genome characteristics contribute to the invasiveness of Phragmites australis (common reed). Mol. Ecol. 31, 1142–1159 (2022).
pubmed: 34839548
doi: 10.1111/mec.16293
Connor, H., Dawson, M., Keating, R. & Gill, L. Chromosome numbers of Phragmites australis (Arundineae: Gramineae) in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Bot. 36, 465–469 (1998).
doi: 10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512584
Clevering, O. A. & Lissner, J. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 64, 185–208 (1999).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00059-5
Saltonstall, K., Peterson, P. M. & Soreng, R. J. Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp. americanus (poaceae: arundinoideae) in North America: evidence from morphological and genetic analyses. Sida. 21, 683–692 (2004).
Lambertini, C. et al. A phylogeographic study of the cosmopolitan genus Phragmites (Poaceae) based on AFLPs. Plant Syst. Evol. 258, 161–182 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00606-006-0412-2
Salojärvi, J. et al. Genome sequencing and population genomic analyses provide insights into the adaptive landscape of silver birch. Nat. Genet. 49, 904–912 (2017).
pubmed: 28481341
doi: 10.1038/ng.3862
Lambertini, C., Sorrell, B. K., Riis, T., Olesen, B. & Brix, H. Exploring the borders of European Phragmites within a cosmopolitan genus. AoB Plants 2012, pls020 (2012).
Ou, S., Chen, J. & Jiang, N. Assessing genome assembly quality using the LTR Assembly Index (LAI). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e126–e126 (2018).
pubmed: 30107434
pmcid: 6265445
Jia, K. H. et al. SubPhaser: a robust allopolyploid subgenome phasing method based on subgenome‐specific k‐mers. New Phytol. 235, 801–809 (2022).
McKain, M. R. et al. A phylogenomic assessment of ancient polyploidy and genome evolution across the Poales. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 1150–1164 (2016).
pubmed: 26988252
pmcid: 4860692
Ma, L. et al. Diploid and tetraploid genomes of Acorus and the evolution of monocots. Nat. Commun. 14, 3661 (2023).
pubmed: 37339946
pmcid: 10282084
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38829-3
Burns, R. et al. Gradual evolution of allopolyploidy in Arabidopsis suecica. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1367–1381 (2021).
pubmed: 34413506
pmcid: 8484011
doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01525-w
Liu, C. & Wang, Y.-G. Does one subgenome become dominant in the formation and evolution of a polyploid? Ann. Bot. 131, 11–16 (2023).
pubmed: 35291007
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac024
Alger, E. I. & Edger, P. P. One subgenome to rule them all: underlying mechanisms of subgenome dominance. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 54, 108–113 (2020).
pubmed: 32344327
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.03.004
Birchler, J. A. & Veitia, R. A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14746–14753 (2012).
pubmed: 22908297
pmcid: 3443177
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207726109
Huang, W. et al. A well-supported nuclear phylogeny of Poaceae and implications for the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Mol. Plant 15, 755–777 (2022).
pubmed: 35093593
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.01.015
Hardion, L. et al. Does infraspecific taxonomy match species evolutionary history? A phylogeographic study of Arundo formosana (Poaceae). Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 183, 236–249 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/bow006
Huang, Y.-L. et al. The impact of tandem duplication on gene evolution in Solanaceae species. J. Integr. Agricult. 21, 1004–1014 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63698-5
Hanada, K., Zou, C., Lehti-Shiu, M. D., Shinozaki, K. & Shiu, S.-H. Importance of lineage-specific expansion of plant tandem duplicates in the adaptive response to environmental stimuli. Plant Physiol. 148, 993–1003 (2008).
pubmed: 18715958
pmcid: 2556807
doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122457
Pyšek, P. et al. Competition among native and invasive Phragmites australis populations: An experimental test of the effects of invasion status, genome size, and ploidy level. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1106–1118 (2020).
pubmed: 32076501
pmcid: 7029062
doi: 10.1002/ece3.5907
Camacho, J. P. M., Sharbel, T. F. & Beukeboom, L. W. B-chromosome evolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355, 163–178 (2000).
pubmed: 10724453
pmcid: 1692730
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0556
Copenhaver, G. P. & Pikaard, C. S. Two‐dimensional RFLP analyses reveal megabase‐sized clusters of rRNA gene variants in Arabidopsis thaliana, suggesting local spreading of variants as the mode for gene homogenization during concerted evolution. Plant J. 9, 273–282 (1996).
pubmed: 8820611
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09020273.x
Liu, B. & Davis, T. M. Conservation and loss of ribosomal RNA gene sites in diploid and polyploid Fragaria (Rosaceae). BMC Plant Biol. 11, 1–13 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-157
Guo, X. & Han, F. Asymmetric epigenetic modification and elimination of rDNA sequences by polyploidization in wheat. Plant Cell 26, 4311–4327 (2014).
pubmed: 25415973
pmcid: 4277213
doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.129841
Dhar, M. K., Kour, J. & Kaul, S. Origin, behaviour, and transmission of B chromosome with special reference to Plantago lagopus. Genes 10, 152 (2019).
pubmed: 30781667
pmcid: 6410184
doi: 10.3390/genes10020152
Augusto Corrêa dos Santos, R., Goldman, G. H. & Riaño-Pachón, D. M. ploidyNGS: visually exploring ploidy with Next Generation Sequencing data. Bioinformatics 33, 2575–2576 (2017).
pubmed: 28383704
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx204
Ramu, P. et al. Cassava haplotype map highlights fixation of deleterious mutations during clonal propagation. Nat. Genet. 49, 959–963 (2017).
pubmed: 28416819
doi: 10.1038/ng.3845
Ishii, J. & Kadono, Y. Factors influencing seed production of Phragmites australis. Aquat. Bot. 72, 129–141 (2002).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00218-2
Kaneko, Y. Biology of the Common Reed (Phragmites australis) surrounding Lake Biwa. In: Lake Biwa: Interactions between Nature and People, (eds Kawanabe, H., Nishino, M. & Maehata, M.) 137–138 (Springer, 2012).
Amsberry, L., Baker, M. A., Ewanchuk, P. J. & Bertness, M. D. Clonal integration and the expansion of Phragmites australis. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1110–1118 (2000).
doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1110:CIATEO]2.0.CO;2
Alvarez, M. G., Tron, F. & Mauchamp, A. Sexual versus asexual colonization by Phragmites australis: 25-year reed dynamics in a Mediterranean marsh, southern France. Wetlands 25, 639–647 (2005).
doi: 10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0639:SVACBP]2.0.CO;2
Čuda, J., Skálová, H., Meyerson, L. A. & Pyšek, P. Regeneration of Phragmites australis from rhizome and culm fragments: an experimental test of environmental effects, population origin and invasion status. Preslia 93, 237–254 (2021).
doi: 10.23855/preslia.2021.237
Glemin, S. & Galtier, N. Genome evolution in outcrossing versus selfing versus asexual species. Evolut. Genomics Stat. Comput. Methods 1, 311–335 (2012).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-582-4_11
Wang, X.-J. et al. The genomic selfing syndrome accompanies the evolutionary breakdown of heterostyly. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 168–180 (2021).
pubmed: 32761213
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa199
Bast, J. et al. Consequences of asexuality in natural populations: insights from stick insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1668–1677 (2018).
pubmed: 29659991
pmcid: 5995167
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy058
Ho, E. K., Bartkowska, M., Wright, S. I. & Agrawal, A. F. Population genomics of the facultatively asexual duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza. N. Phytol. 224, 1361–1371 (2019).
doi: 10.1111/nph.16056
Tvedte, E. S., Ward, A. C., Trendle, B., Forbes, A. A. & Logsdon J. R. J. M. Genome evolution in a putatively asexual wasp. bioRxiv. ( https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.23.424202 ) (2020).
Chen, J., Glémin, S. & Lascoux, M. Genetic diversity and the efficacy of purifying selection across plant and animal species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1417–1428 (2017).
pubmed: 28333215
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx088
Henry, L., Schwander, T. & Crespi, B. J. Deleterious mutation accumulation in asexual Timema stick insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 401–408 (2012).
pubmed: 21940645
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr237
Lovell, J. T., Williamson, R. J., Wright, S. I., McKay, J. K. & Sharbel, T. F. Mutation accumulation in an asexual relative of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006550 (2017).
pubmed: 28068346
pmcid: 5261742
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006550
Albert, A., Brisson, J., Belzile, F., Turgeon, J. & Lavoie, C. Strategies for a successful plant invasion: the reproduction of Phragmites australis in north‐eastern North America. J. Ecol. 103, 1529–1537 (2015).
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12473
Dwivedi, S. L. et al. Evolutionary dynamics and adaptive benefits of deleterious mutations in crop gene pools. Trends Plant Sci. 28, 685–697 (2023).
pubmed: 36764870
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.01.006
Jike, W. et al. Phylogenomic proof of recurrent demipolyploidization and evolutionary stalling of the “Triploid Bridge” in Arundo (Poaceae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 5247 (2020).
pubmed: 32722033
pmcid: 7432733
doi: 10.3390/ijms21155247
Wang, C. et al. Genome-wide analysis tracks the emergence of intraspecific polyploids in Phragmites australis. bioRxiv. ( https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.05.458733 ) (2021).
Holmes, D. & Bougourd, S. B-chromosome selection in Allium schoenoprasum II. Experimental populations. Heredity 67, 117–122 (1991).
doi: 10.1038/hdy.1991.70
Teoh, S., Rees, H. & Hutchinson, J. B chromosome selection in Lolium. Heredity 37, 207–213 (1976).
doi: 10.1038/hdy.1976.83
Banaei-Moghaddam, A. M., Meier, K., Karimi-Ashtiyani, R. & Houben, A. Formation and expression of pseudogenes on the B chromosome of rye. Plant Cell 25, 2536–2544 (2013).
pubmed: 23839789
pmcid: 3753381
doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111856
Randolph, L. Genetic characteristics of the B chromosomes in maize. Genetics 26, 608 (1941).
pubmed: 17247025
pmcid: 1224308
doi: 10.1093/genetics/26.6.608
Huang, W., Du, Y., Zhao, X. & Jin, W. B chromosome contains active genes and impacts the transcription of A chromosomes in maize (Zea mays L.). BMC Plant Biol. 16, 1–14 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0775-7
Ma, W., Liu, Z., Beier, S., Houben, A. & Carpentier, S. Identification of rye B chromosome‐associated peptides by mass spectrometry. N. Phytol. 230, 2179–2185 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/nph.17238
Shi, X. et al. Effect of aneuploidy of a non‐essential chromosome on gene expression in maize. Plant J. 110, 193–211 (2022).
pubmed: 34997647
pmcid: 9310612
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15665
Romera, F., Vega, J., Diez, M. & Puertas, M. B chromosome polymorphism in Korean rye populations. Heredity 62, 117–121 (1989).
pubmed: 2732082
doi: 10.1038/hdy.1989.16
Schelkunov, M. I. et al. The genome of the toxic invasive species Heracleum sosnowskyi carries an increased number of genes despite absence of recent whole-genome duplications. Plant J. 117, 449–463 (2024).
Bi, C. et al. PMAT: an efficient plant mitogenome assembly toolkit using low coverage HiFi sequencing data. Horticult. Res. 11, https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhae023 (2024).
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).
pubmed: 30936562
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8
Jin, J.-J. et al. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 21, 1–31 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5
Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zobel, J. & Holt, K. E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31, 3350–3352 (2015).
pubmed: 26099265
pmcid: 4595904
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383
Cheng, H., Concepcion, G. T., Feng, X., Zhang, H. & Li, H. Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat. Methods 18, 170–175 (2021).
pubmed: 33526886
pmcid: 7961889
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5
Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhao, Q., Ming, R. & Tang, H. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nat. Plants 5, 833–845 (2019).
pubmed: 31383970
doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0487-8
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst. 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249
pmcid: 5846465
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox provides a visualization system for Hi-C contact maps with unlimited zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).
pubmed: 27467250
pmcid: 5596920
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012
Dudchenko, O. et al. The Juicebox Assembly Tools module facilitates de novo assembly of mammalian genomes with chromosome-length scaffolds for under $1000. BioRxiv, 254797 (2018).
Xu, M. et al. TGS-GapCloser: a fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads. GigaScience 9, giaa094 (2020).
pubmed: 32893860
pmcid: 7476103
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa094
Chikhi, R. & Medvedev, P. Informed and automated k-mer size selection for genome assembly. Bioinformatics 30, 31–37 (2014).
pubmed: 23732276
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt310
Zimin, A. V. et al. The MaSuRCA genome assembler. Bioinformatics 29, 2669–2677 (2013).
pubmed: 23990416
pmcid: 3799473
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt476
Roach, M. J., Schmidt, S. A. & Borneman, A. R. Purge Haplotigs: allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinforma. 19, 1–10 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7
Simão, F. A., Waterhouse, R. M., Ioannidis, P., Kriventseva, E. V. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212 (2015).
pubmed: 26059717
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351
Gurevich, A., Saveliev, V., Vyahhi, N. & Tesler, G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075 (2013).
pubmed: 23422339
pmcid: 3624806
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086
Alonge, M. et al. Automated assembly scaffolding using RagTag elevates a new tomato system for high-throughput genome editing. Genome Biol. 23, 1–19 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02823-7
Ellinghaus, D., Kurtz, S. & Willhoeft, U. LTRharvest, an efficient and flexible software for de novo detection of LTR retrotransposons. BMC Bioinforma. 9, 1–14 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-18
Flynn, J. M. et al. RepeatModeler2 for automated genomic discovery of transposable element families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9451–9457 (2020).
pubmed: 32300014
pmcid: 7196820
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921046117
Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964 (1997).
pubmed: 9023104
pmcid: 146525
doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955
Nawrocki, E. P. & Eddy, S. R. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29, 2933–2935 (2013).
pubmed: 24008419
pmcid: 3810854
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509
Lomsadze, A., Ter-Hovhannisyan, V., Chernoff, Y. O. & Borodovsky, M. Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 6494–6506 (2005).
pubmed: 16314312
pmcid: 1298918
doi: 10.1093/nar/gki937
Hoff, K., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: Incorporating Protein Homology Information into Gene Prediction with GeneMark-EP and AUGUSTUS. In: Plant and Animal Genomes XXVI, (San Diego, California, 2018).
Haas, B. J., Zeng, Q., Pearson, M. D., Cuomo, C. A. & Wortman, J. R. Approaches to fungal genome annotation. Mycology 2, 118–141 (2011).
pubmed: 22059117
doi: 10.1080/21501203.2011.606851
Stanke, M. et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, W435–W439 (2006).
pubmed: 16845043
pmcid: 1538822
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200
Goodstein, D. M. et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D1178–D1186 (2012).
pubmed: 22110026
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr944
Keilwagen, J., Hartung, F. & Grau, J. GeMoMa: homology-based gene prediction utilizing intron position conservation and RNA-seq data. Methods Mol. Biol. 1962, 161–177 (2019).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Brůna, T., Hoff, K. J., Lomsadze, A., Stanke, M. & Borodovsky, M. BRAKER2: automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genomics Bioinforma. 3, lqaa108 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa108
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644 (2011).
pubmed: 21572440
pmcid: 3571712
doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883
Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).
pubmed: 25690850
pmcid: 4643835
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3122
Haas, B. J. et al. Improving the Arabidopsis genome annotation using maximal transcript alignment assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 5654–5666 (2003).
pubmed: 14500829
pmcid: 206470
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg770
Haas, B. J. et al. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol. 9, 1–22 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7
Buchfink, B., Reuter, K. & Drost, H.-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 18, 366–368 (2021).
pubmed: 33828273
pmcid: 8026399
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A. & Zdobnov, E. M. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 4647–4654 (2021).
pubmed: 34320186
pmcid: 8476166
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199
Shen, L. GeneOverlap: an R package to test and visualize gene overlaps. https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/GeneOverlap.html (2023).
Cabanettes, F. & Klopp, C. D-GENIES: dot plot large genomes in an interactive, efficient and simple way. PeerJ 6, e4958 (2018).
pubmed: 29888139
pmcid: 5991294
doi: 10.7717/peerj.4958
He, W. et al. NGenomeSyn: an easy-to-use and flexible tool for publication-ready visualization of syntenic relationships across multiple genomes. Bioinformatics 39, btad121 (2023).
pubmed: 36883694
pmcid: 10027429
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad121
Goel, M., Sun, H., Jiao, W.-B. & Schneeberger, K. SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 20, 1–13 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1911-0
Goel, M. & Schneeberger, K. plotsr: visualizing structural similarities and rearrangements between multiple genomes. Bioinformatics 38, 2922–2926 (2022).
pubmed: 35561173
pmcid: 9113368
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac196
Klopfenstein, D. et al. GOATOOLS: a python library for gene ontology analyses. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–17 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28948-z
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 1–14 (2019).
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y
Almeida-Silva, F. & Van de Peer, Y. Assessing the quality of comparative genomics data and results with the cogeqc R/Bioconductor package. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 14, 2942–2952 (2023).
Gel, B. & Serra, E. karyoploteR: an R/Bioconductor package to plot customizable genomes displaying arbitrary data. Bioinformatics 33, 3088–3090 (2017).
pubmed: 28575171
pmcid: 5870550
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx346
Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).
pubmed: 24451623
pmcid: 3998144
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033
Zhang, C., Rabiee, M., Sayyari, E. & Mirarab, S. ASTRAL-III: polynomial time species tree reconstruction from partially resolved gene trees. BMC Bioinforma. 19, 15–30 (2018).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2129-y
dos Reis, M. & Yang, Z. Bayesian Molecular Clock Dating Using Genome-Scale Datasets. in Evolutionary Genomics: Statistical and Computational Methods (ed. Anisimova, M.) 309–330 (Springer, 2019).
Yang, Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).
pubmed: 17483113
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088
Ramirez-Barahona, S., Sauquet, H. & Magallon, S. The delayed and geographically heterogeneous diversification of flowering plant families. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1232–1238 (2020).
pubmed: 32632260
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1241-3
Wolfe, K. H., Gouy, M., Yang, Y.-W., Sharp, P. M. & Li, W.-H. Date of the monocot-dicot divergence estimated from chloroplast DNA sequence data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 6201–6205 (1989).
pubmed: 2762323
pmcid: 297805
doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6201
Santos, R.A.C.d., Goldman, G. H. & Riaño-Pachón, D. M. ploidyNGS: visually exploring ploidy with next generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 33, 2575–2576 (2016).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 2705234
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from whole genome sequence of a single individual. Nature 475, 493 (2011).
pubmed: 21753753
pmcid: 3154645
doi: 10.1038/nature10231
De La Torre, A. R., Li, Z., Van de Peer, Y. & Ingvarsson, P. K. Contrasting rates of molecular evolution and patterns of selection among gymnosperms and flowering plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1363–1377 (2017).
pubmed: 28333233
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx069
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).
pubmed: 21903627
pmcid: 3198575
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinforma. 15, 1–13 (2014).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4
Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92 (2012).
pubmed: 22728672
pmcid: 3679285
doi: 10.4161/fly.19695