Breaking bad news: an active learning method for medical students.
Announcement
Breaking bad news
Discussion group
Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)
S-P-w-ICE-S protocol
Journal
BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Sep 2024
12 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
13
03
2024
accepted:
25
07
2024
medline:
13
9
2024
pubmed:
13
9
2024
entrez:
12
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult aspects of communication in medicine. The objective of this study was to assess the relevance of a novel active learning course on breaking bad news for fifth-year students. Students were divided into two groups: Group 1, the intervention group, participated in a multidisciplinary formative discussion workshop on breaking bad news with videos, discussions with a pluri-professional team, and concluding with the development of a guide on good practice in breaking bad news through collective intelligence; Group 2, the control group, received no additional training besides conventional university course. The relevance of discussion-group-based active training was assessed in a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station particularly through the students' communication skills. Thirty-one students were included: 17 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2. The mean (range) score in the OSCE was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.49 out of 15 (7; 13) vs. 7.80 (4.75; 12.5), respectively; p = 0.0007). The proportion of students assessed by the evaluator to have received additional training in breaking bad news was 88.2% (15 of the 17) in Group 1 and 21.4% (3 of the 14) in Group 2 (p = 0.001). The intergroup differences in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were not significant, and both scores were not correlated with the students' self-assessed score for success in the OSCE. Compared to the conventional course, this new active learning method for breaking bad news was associated with a significantly higher score in a summative OSCE. A longer-term validation study is needed to confirm these exploratory data.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Breaking bad news is one of the most difficult aspects of communication in medicine. The objective of this study was to assess the relevance of a novel active learning course on breaking bad news for fifth-year students.
METHODS
METHODS
Students were divided into two groups: Group 1, the intervention group, participated in a multidisciplinary formative discussion workshop on breaking bad news with videos, discussions with a pluri-professional team, and concluding with the development of a guide on good practice in breaking bad news through collective intelligence; Group 2, the control group, received no additional training besides conventional university course. The relevance of discussion-group-based active training was assessed in a summative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) station particularly through the students' communication skills.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Thirty-one students were included: 17 in Group 1 and 14 in Group 2. The mean (range) score in the OSCE was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.49 out of 15 (7; 13) vs. 7.80 (4.75; 12.5), respectively; p = 0.0007). The proportion of students assessed by the evaluator to have received additional training in breaking bad news was 88.2% (15 of the 17) in Group 1 and 21.4% (3 of the 14) in Group 2 (p = 0.001). The intergroup differences in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores were not significant, and both scores were not correlated with the students' self-assessed score for success in the OSCE.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to the conventional course, this new active learning method for breaking bad news was associated with a significantly higher score in a summative OSCE. A longer-term validation study is needed to confirm these exploratory data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39267024
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05821-4
pii: 10.1186/s12909-024-05821-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
994Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Jalali R, Jalali A, Jalilian M. Breaking bad news in medical services: a comprehensive systematic review. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e14734.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14734
Abel J, Dennison S, Senior-Smith G, Dolley T, Lovett J, Cassidy S. Breaking bad news–development of a hospital-based training workshop. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(6):380–4.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00393-4
Buckman R. Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult? Br Med J Clin Res Ed. 1984;288(6430):1597–9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6430.1597
Gilbey P. Qualitative analysis of parents’ experience with receiving the news of the detection of their child’s hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(3):265–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.11.017
Warrier V, Pradhan A. A narrative review of interventions to teach medical students how to Break Bad News. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(3):1299–312.
doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01015-x
VandeKieft GK. Breaking bad news. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64(12):1975–8.
TAN KKY, PANG A, KANG JX. Breaking bad news with CONSOLE: toward a framework integrating medical protocols with crisis communication. Public Relat Rev. 2019;45(1):153–66.
doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.013
de Moura Villela EF, Bastos LK, de Almeida WS, Pereira AO, de Paula Rocha MS, de Oliveira FM, et al. Effects on Medical students of Longitudinal Small-Group learning about breaking Bad News. Perm J. 2020;24(2):19157.
doi: 10.7812/TPP/19.157
Narayanan V, Bista B, Koshy C. BREAKS’ protocol for breaking Bad News. Indian J Palliat Care. 2010;16(2):61–5.
doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.68401
Rosenzweig MQ. Breaking bad news: a guide for effective and empathetic communication. Nurse Pract. 2012;37(2):1–4.
doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000408626.24599.9e
Meitar D, Karnieli-Miller O. Twelve tips to manage a breaking bad news process: using S-P-w-ICE-S - A revised version of the SPIKES protocol. Med Teach. 2022;44(10):1087–91.
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1928618
Baile WF, Buckman R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP. SPIKES-A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist. 2000;5(4):302–11.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302
Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach. 2007;29(1):38–42.
doi: 10.1080/01421590601176398
Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1965. p. 326.
doi: 10.1515/9781400876136
Vallieres EF, Vallerand RJ. Traduction Et Validation Canadienne-Française De L’échelle De L’estime De Soi De Rosenberg*. Int J Psychol. 1990;25(2):305–16.
doi: 10.1080/00207599008247865
Blanco JM, Caballero F, García FJ, Lorenzo F, Monge D. Validation of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy in Spanish medical students who participated in an early clerkship immersion programme. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):1–11.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1309-9
McTighe AJ, DiTomasso RA, Felgoise S, Hojat M. Correlation between standardize patients’ perceptions of Osteopathic Medical students and students’ self-rated Empathy. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016;116(10):640–6.
Hojat M, DeSantis J, Shannon SC, Mortensen LH, Speicher MR, Bragan L, et al. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy: a nationwide study of measurement properties, underlying components, latent variable structure, and national norms in medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2018;23(5):899–920.
doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9839-9
Shanks A, Brann M, Bute J, Borse V, Tonismae T, Scott N. Breaking Bad News: a randomized trial assessing Resident Performance after Novel Video instruction. Cureus. 2021;13(6):e15461.
Hanya M, Kanno Y, Akasaki J, Abe K, Fujisaki K, Kamei H. Effects of communication skill training (CST) based on SPIKES for insurance-covered pharmacy pharmacists to interact with simulated cancer patients. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2017;3(1):1–8.
doi: 10.1186/s40780-017-0080-0
Bosshard M, Schmitz FM, Guttormsen S, Nater UM, Gomez P, Berendonk C. From threat to challenge—improving medical students’ stress response and communication skills performance through the combination of stress arousal reappraisal and preparatory worked example-based learning when breaking bad news to simulated patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):1–14.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01167-6
Sobczak K, Trzciński M, Kotłowska A, Lenkiewicz J, Lenkiewicz O, Przeniosło J, et al. Delivering Bad News: emotional perspective and coping strategies of medical students. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:3061–74.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S421995