Chromobacterium indicum sp. nov., a Pigment-Producing Bacterium Isolated from Soil.
Journal
Current microbiology
ISSN: 1432-0991
Titre abrégé: Curr Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7808448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2024
02 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
28
03
2024
accepted:
17
09
2024
medline:
2
10
2024
pubmed:
2
10
2024
entrez:
2
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A purple colony, designated as TRC1.1.SA was isolated from a tea garden soil sample. It was a Gram-negative, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming and motile bacterium. The strain TRC1.1.SA
Identifiants
pubmed: 39356301
doi: 10.1007/s00284-024-03910-7
pii: 10.1007/s00284-024-03910-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
DNA, Bacterial
0
Fatty Acids
0
Pigments, Biological
0
Phospholipids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
385Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Lopes LD, Futrell SL, Wright EE, Danalatos GJ, Castellano MJ, Vyn TJ, Archontoulis SV, Schachtman DP (2023) Soil depth and geographic distance modulate bacterial β-diversity in deep soil profiles throughout the U.S. Corn Belt. Mol Ecol 32:3718–3732. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16945
doi: 10.1111/mec.16945
pubmed: 37000121
Tønjum T (2005) Order IV. Neisseriales ord. nov. bergeys manual of systematic bacteriology. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Vol 2. 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 774–798
Adeolu M, GuptaRS, (2013) Phylogenomics and molecular signatures for the order Neisseriales: proposal for division of the order Neisseriales into the emended family Neisseriaceae and Chromobacteriaceae fam. nov. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 104:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126251
doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126251
pubmed: 23575986
Chen S, Rudra B, Gupta RS (2021) Phylogenomics and molecular signatures support division of the order Neisseriales into emended families Neisseriaceae and Chromobacteriaceae and three new families Aquaspirillaceae fam. nov., Chitinibacteraceae fam. nov., and Leeiaceae fam. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 44:12625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126251
doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2021.126251
Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M (2020) List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70:5607–5612. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004332
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332
pubmed: 32701423
pmcid: 7723251
Martin PA, Gundersen-Rindal D, Blackburn M, Buyer J (2007) Chromobacterium subtsugae sp. nov., a betaproteobacterium toxic to Colorado potato beetle and other insect pests. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:993–999. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64611-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64611-0
pubmed: 17473247
Vöing K, Harrison A, Soby SD (2015) Draft genome sequence of Chromobacterium vaccinii, a potential biocontrol agent against mosquito (Aedes aegypti) larvae. Genome Announc. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00477-15
doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00477-15
pubmed: 26358592
pmcid: 4566174
Durán N, Justo GZ, Ferreira CV, Melo PS, Cordi L, Martins D (2007) Violacein: properties and biological activities. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 48:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1042/BA20070115
doi: 10.1042/BA20070115
pubmed: 17927569
Durán N, Justo GZ, Durán M, Brocchi M, Cordi L, Tasic L, Castro GR, Nakazato G (2016) Advances in Chromobacterium violaceum and properties of violacein-Its main secondary metabolite: a review. Biotechnol Adv 34:1030–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.06.003
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.06.003
pubmed: 27288924
Kämpfer P, Glaeser SP, Soby SD (2018) Chromobacterium pseudoviolaceum Kämpfer et al. 2009 is a later heterotypic synonym of Chromobacterium violaceum Bergonzini 1880. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 68:2967–2968. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002930
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002930
pubmed: 30028284
Han XY, Han FS, Segal J (2008) Chromobacterium haemolyticum sp. nov., a strongly haemolytic species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1398–1403. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64681-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64681-0
pubmed: 18523185
Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, Scholz HC (2009) Chromobacterium piscinae sp. nov. and Chromobacterium pseudoviolaceum sp. nov., from environmental samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2486–2490. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.008888-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.008888-0
pubmed: 19622653
Sangal V, Goodfellow M, Jones AL, Schwalbe EC et al (2016) Next-generation systematics: an innovative approach to resolve the structure of complex prokaryotic taxa. Sci Rep 6:38392. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38392
doi: 10.1038/srep38392
pubmed: 27924912
pmcid: 5141411
Shakya M, Ahmed SA, Davenport KW et al (2020) Standardized phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analysis applied to species across the microbial tree of life. Sci Rep 10:1723. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58356-1
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58356-1
pubmed: 32015354
pmcid: 6997174
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R (2009) Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:19126–19131. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906412106
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106
pubmed: 19855009
pmcid: 2776425
Cowan ST, Steel KJ (1965) Manual for the identification of medical bacteria. Cambridge University Press, London
Lányi B (1988) Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria. Methods Microbiol 19:1–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70407-0
doi: 10.1016/s0580-9517(08)70407-0
Smibert RM, Krieg NR (1994) Phenotypic characterization. In: Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR (eds) Methods for general and molecular bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 607–654
Suresh K, Prakash D, Rastogi N, Jain RK (2007) Clostridium nitrophenolicum sp. nov., a novel anaerobic p-nitrophenol-degrading bacterium, isolated from a subsurface soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1886–1890. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64604-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64604-0
pubmed: 17684276
Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Tech Note 101:1–6
Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al (1984) An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 2:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6
doi: 10.1016/0167-7012(84)90018-6
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, Seo H, Chun J (2017) Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 67:1613. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
pubmed: 28005526
pmcid: 5563544
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) ClustalW Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
pubmed: 7984417
pmcid: 308517
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
pubmed: 3447015
Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195135848.001.0001
Rzhetsky A, Nei M (1992) A simple method for estimating and testing minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 9:945–967
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) Mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
pubmed: 27004904
pmcid: 8210823
Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
doi: 10.1007/BF01731581
pubmed: 7463489
Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023
pubmed: 8336541
Lo CC, Chain PS (2014) Rapid evaluation and quality control of next generation sequencing data with FaQCs. BMC Bioinform 15:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2
doi: 10.1186/s12859-014-0366-2
Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D et al (2020) Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinform 70:1934–3396. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.102
doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT et al (2015) CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.186072.114
doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114
pubmed: 25977477
pmcid: 4484387
Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim JM, Kwon SJ, Chun J (2017) A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110:1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4
doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4
pubmed: 28204908
Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT (2016) The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. Peer J Preprints 4:e1900v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.19000
doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.19000
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform 14:60. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-60
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60
Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW (2007) RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm160
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160
pubmed: 17452365
pmcid: 1888812
Haft DH, Di Cuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O’Neill K, Pruitt KD (2018) RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1068
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068
pubmed: 29112715
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA et al (2008) The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom 9:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M (2019) TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3
pubmed: 31097708
pmcid: 6522516
Farris JS (1972) Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. Am Nat 106:645–667. https://doi.org/10.1086/282802
doi: 10.1086/282802
Zuo G, Hao B (2015) CVTree3 web server for whole-genome-based and alignment-free prokaryotic phylogeny and taxonomy. Genom Proteom Bioinform 13:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.08.004
Chaudhari NM, GuptaVK DC (2016) BPGA-an ultra-fast pan-genome analysis pipeline. Sci Rep 6:24373. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24373
doi: 10.1038/srep24373
pubmed: 27071527
pmcid: 4829868
Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen CY, Stothard P (2023) Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:484–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad326
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326
Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, Weber T (2023) antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res 51:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad344
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad344
Sasidharan A, Sasidharan NK, Amma DB, Vasu RK, Nataraja AV, Bhaskaran K (2015) Antifungal activity of violacein purified from a novel strain of Chromobacterium sp. NIIST (MTCC 5522). J Microbiol 53:694–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-015-5173-6
doi: 10.1007/s12275-015-5173-6
pubmed: 26428920
Blackburn MB, Farrar RR Jr, Sparks ME, Kuhar D, Mowery JD, Mitchell A, Gundersen-Rindal DE (2019) Chromobacterium phragmitis sp. nov., isolated from estuarine marshes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:2681–2686. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003508
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003508
pubmed: 31199223
Soby SD, Gadagkar SR, Contreras C, Caruso FL (2013) Chromobacterium vaccinii sp. nov., isolated from native and cultivated cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) bogs and irrigation ponds. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1840–1846. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.045161-0
doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.045161-0
pubmed: 22984138
August PR, Grossman TH, Minor C, Draper MP, MacNeil IA, Pemberton JM, Osburne MS (2000) Sequence analysis and functional characterization of the violacein biosynthetic pathway from Chromobacterium violaceum. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 2:513–519
pubmed: 11075927
Zhang X, Enomoto K (2011) Characterization of a gene cluster and its putative promoter region for violacein biosynthesis in Pseudoalteromonas sp. 520P1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1963–1971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3203-9
doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3203-9
pubmed: 21472536
Anahas AM, Kumaran S, Kandeel M, Muralitharan G, Silviya J, Adhimoolam GL, Prasannabalaji N (2022) Applications of natural violet pigments from Halophilic Chromobacterium violaceum PDF23 for textile dyeing with antimicrobial and antioxidant potentials. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3885396
doi: 10.1155/2022/3885396
Leon LL, Miranda CC, De Souza AO, Durán N (2001) Antileishmanial activity of the violacein extracted from Chromobacterium violaceum. J Antimicrob Chemother 48:449–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/48.3.449
doi: 10.1093/jac/48.3.449
pubmed: 11533018