Genome Comparisons of Wild Isolates of Caulobacter crescentus Reveal Rates of Inversion and Horizontal Gene Transfer.
Journal
Current microbiology
ISSN: 1432-0991
Titre abrégé: Curr Microbiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7808448
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
30
08
2018
accepted:
23
11
2018
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
31
5
2019
entrez:
29
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Since previous interspecies comparisons of Caulobacter genomes have revealed extensive genome rearrangements, we decided to compare the nucleotide sequences of four C. crescentus genomes, NA1000, CB1, CB2, and CB13. To accomplish this goal, we used PacBio sequencing technology to determine the nucleotide sequence of the CB1, CB2, and CB13 genomes, and obtained each genome sequence as a single contig. To correct for possible sequencing errors, each genome was sequenced twice. The only differences we observed between the two sets of independently determined sequences were random omissions of a single base in a small percentage of the homopolymer regions where a single base is repeated multiple times. Comparisons of these four genomes indicated that horizontal gene transfer events that included small numbers of genes occurred at frequencies in the range of 10
Identifiants
pubmed: 30483871
doi: 10.1007/s00284-018-1606-x
pii: 10.1007/s00284-018-1606-x
pmc: PMC6368467
mid: NIHMS1514935
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
159-167Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R25 GM076277
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of General Medical Sciences
ID : P20GM103446
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103446
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institute of General Medical Sciences
ID : GM076277
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R25 GM066526
Pays : United States
Références
Nature. 2000 May 18;405(6784):299-304
pubmed: 10830951
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):4136-41
pubmed: 11259647
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Feb 15;30(4):866-75
pubmed: 11842097
Bacteriol Rev. 1964 Sep;28:231-95
pubmed: 14220656
Methods Enzymol. 1991;204:372-84
pubmed: 1658564
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 13;104(7):2043-9
pubmed: 17261804
J Bacteriol. 2010 Jul;192(14):3678-88
pubmed: 20472802
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 25;5(6):e11147
pubmed: 20593022
J Comput Biol. 2011 Jul;18(7):917-24
pubmed: 21457008
Mol Syst Biol. 2011 Aug 30;7:528
pubmed: 21878915
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jul 24;13:341
pubmed: 22827831
Curr Microbiol. 2012 Nov;65(5):639-42
pubmed: 23010940
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e68824
pubmed: 23894349
Open Biol. 2014 Oct;4(10):null
pubmed: 25274120
Curr Microbiol. 2015 Mar;70(3):338-44
pubmed: 25377284
J Biosci. 2015 Jun;40(2):465-72
pubmed: 25963270
Curr Microbiol. 2016 May;72(5):503-10
pubmed: 26750121
PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 17;14(3):e1002417
pubmed: 26987049
Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 25;8:1536
pubmed: 28890711
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 10;8(1):841
pubmed: 29018197
Curr Microbiol. 2018 Dec;75(12):1642-1648
pubmed: 30259084
ISME J. 2019 Feb;13(2):523-536
pubmed: 30297849
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):207-212
pubmed: 30309949
Genetics. 1977 May;86(1):25-32
pubmed: 407126
Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667-86
pubmed: 9560386