RNA-seq based transcriptional analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans in mixed-culture fermentations under anaerobic conditions.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 17 04 2018
accepted: 05 02 2019
entrez: 20 2 2019
pubmed: 20 2 2019
medline: 5 6 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In wine fermentation starter cultures, the blending of non-Saccharomyces yeast with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the complexity of wine has become common practice, but data regarding the impact of co-cultivation on yeast physiology and on genetic and metabolic regulation remain limited. Here we describe a transcriptomic analysis of mixed fermentations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans. The fermentations were carried out in carefully controlled environmental conditions in a bioreactor to reduce transcriptomic responses that would be due to factors other than the presence of the second species. The transcriptomic data revealed that both yeast species showed a clear response to the presence of the other. Affected genes primarily belonged to two groups: genes whose expression can be linked to the competition for certain trace elements such as copper and iron, as well as genes required for cell wall structure and integrity. Furthermore, the data revealed divergent transcriptional responses with regard to carbon metabolism in response to anoxic conditions. The results suggest that the mixed fermentation created a more competitive and stressful environment for the two species than single strain fermentations independently from total biomass, i.e. competition between cells of the same species is less stressful, or may present a different set of challenges, than interspecies competition. The changes in cell wall and adhesion properties encoding genes suggest that the adjustment of physical contact between cells may play a direct role in the response to the presence of competing species.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In wine fermentation starter cultures, the blending of non-Saccharomyces yeast with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve the complexity of wine has become common practice, but data regarding the impact of co-cultivation on yeast physiology and on genetic and metabolic regulation remain limited. Here we describe a transcriptomic analysis of mixed fermentations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lachancea thermotolerans. The fermentations were carried out in carefully controlled environmental conditions in a bioreactor to reduce transcriptomic responses that would be due to factors other than the presence of the second species.
RESULTS RESULTS
The transcriptomic data revealed that both yeast species showed a clear response to the presence of the other. Affected genes primarily belonged to two groups: genes whose expression can be linked to the competition for certain trace elements such as copper and iron, as well as genes required for cell wall structure and integrity. Furthermore, the data revealed divergent transcriptional responses with regard to carbon metabolism in response to anoxic conditions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results suggest that the mixed fermentation created a more competitive and stressful environment for the two species than single strain fermentations independently from total biomass, i.e. competition between cells of the same species is less stressful, or may present a different set of challenges, than interspecies competition. The changes in cell wall and adhesion properties encoding genes suggest that the adjustment of physical contact between cells may play a direct role in the response to the presence of competing species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30777005
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5511-x
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5511-x
pmc: PMC6379982
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

145

Subventions

Organisme : National Research Foundation
ID : 83471
Organisme : National Research Foundation
ID : TP14070874355

Références

J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 13;275(41):32310-6
pubmed: 10922376
Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Dec;11(12):4241-57
pubmed: 11102521
J Appl Microbiol. 2001 Sep;91(3):541-7
pubmed: 11556922
Yeast. 2003 Mar;20(4):331-41
pubmed: 12627399
Physiol Genomics. 2005 Aug 11;22(3):356-67
pubmed: 15886332
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Apr 25;108(2):239-45
pubmed: 16487611
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 May 1;108(3):336-45
pubmed: 16564103
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Jul;1763(7):636-45
pubmed: 16806534
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2881-7
pubmed: 17881408
Microbiology. 2007 Nov;153(Pt 11):3864-78
pubmed: 17975095
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
pubmed: 19289445
Bioinformatics. 2009 Oct 1;25(19):2607-8
pubmed: 19654119
Microbiology. 2009 Dec;155(Pt 12):4036-49
pubmed: 19762443
FEMS Yeast Res. 2010 Mar;10(2):123-33
pubmed: 19807789
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 1;26(1):139-40
pubmed: 19910308
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010 Apr;86(3):965-72
pubmed: 20039034
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Feb;10(2):M110.002741
pubmed: 21078892
BMC Genomics. 2011 May 09;12:218
pubmed: 21554735
Food Microbiol. 2011 Aug;28(5):873-82
pubmed: 21569929
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 May 25;18(10):3091-2
pubmed: 2190191
Food Microbiol. 2012 Feb;29(1):121-31
pubmed: 22029926
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e38720
pubmed: 22802930
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:634674
pubmed: 22928082
Food Microbiol. 2012 Dec;32(2):243-53
pubmed: 22986187
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(11):1061-79
pubmed: 23019066
J Proteome Res. 2013 Jan 4;12(1):432-43
pubmed: 23181408
Food Microbiol. 2013 Apr;33(2):271-81
pubmed: 23200661
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Feb 3;171:108-18
pubmed: 24334096
Int J Food Microbiol. 2014 Jul 2;181:85-91
pubmed: 24831930
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Environ Microbiol. 2015 Aug;17(8):3069-81
pubmed: 26079802
Microb Cell Fact. 2015 Aug 28;14:124
pubmed: 26314747
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 22;7:555
pubmed: 27148235
Int J Food Microbiol. 2017 Jan 16;241:60-68
pubmed: 27756034
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;101(6):2479-2491
pubmed: 27913851
mSphere. 2018 Oct 24;3(5):
pubmed: 30355663

Auteurs

Kirti Shekhawat (K)

Institute for Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

Hugh Patterton (H)

Centre for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

Florian F Bauer (FF)

Institute for Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa.

Mathabatha E Setati (ME)

Institute for Wine Biotechnology, Department of Viticulture and Oenology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa. setati@sun.ac.za.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Organoids Humans Tissue Engineering Coculture Techniques Regenerative Medicine
Aspergillus Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Coculture Techniques Secondary Metabolism Streptomyces rimosus

Classifications MeSH