Transcriptomic comparison between developing seeds of yellow- and black-seeded Brassica napus reveals that genes influence seed quality.
Brassica napus
Fatty acid
Flavonoid biosynthesis
Gene expression
Seed coat color
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 May 2019
16 May 2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2018
accepted:
07
05
2019
entrez:
18
5
2019
pubmed:
18
5
2019
medline:
27
6
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Brassica napus is of substantial economic value for vegetable oil, biofuel, and animal fodder production. The breeding of yellow-seeded B. napus to improve seed quality with higher oil content, improved oil and meal quality with fewer antinutrients merits attention. Screening the genes related to this phenotype is valuable for future rapeseed breeding. A total of 85,407 genes, including 4317 novel genes, were identified in the developing seeds of yellow- and black-seeded B. napus, and yellow rapeseed was shown to be an introgression line between black-seeded B. napus and yellow-seeded Sinapis alba. A total of 15,251 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified among all the libraries, and 563 and 397 common DEGs were identified throughout black and yellow seed development, including 80 upregulated and 151 downregulated genes related to seed development and fatty acid accumulation. In addition, 11 up-DEGs and 31 down-DEGs were identified in all developmental stages of yellow rapeseed compared with black seed. Enrichment analysis revealed that many DEGs were involved in biosynthetic processes, pigment metabolism, and oxidation-reduction processes, such as flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, and fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism. We found that more than 77 DEGs were related to flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis, including 4CL, C4H, and PAL, which participated in phenylalanine metabolism, and BAN, CHI/TT5, DFR, F3H, FLS, LDOX, PAP, CHS/TT4, TT5, bHLH/TT8, WD40, MYB, TCP, and CYP, which were involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. Most of these DEGs were downregulated in yellow rapeseed and were consistent with the decreased flavonoid and lignin contents. Both up- and down-DEGs related to fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism were also analyzed, which could help to explain the improved oil content of yellow rapeseed. This research provided comprehensive transcriptome data for yellow-seeded B. napus with a unique genetic background, and all the DEGs in comparison with the black-seeded counterpart could help to explain seed quality differences, such as lower pigmentation and lignin contents, and higher oil content.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Brassica napus is of substantial economic value for vegetable oil, biofuel, and animal fodder production. The breeding of yellow-seeded B. napus to improve seed quality with higher oil content, improved oil and meal quality with fewer antinutrients merits attention. Screening the genes related to this phenotype is valuable for future rapeseed breeding.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 85,407 genes, including 4317 novel genes, were identified in the developing seeds of yellow- and black-seeded B. napus, and yellow rapeseed was shown to be an introgression line between black-seeded B. napus and yellow-seeded Sinapis alba. A total of 15,251 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified among all the libraries, and 563 and 397 common DEGs were identified throughout black and yellow seed development, including 80 upregulated and 151 downregulated genes related to seed development and fatty acid accumulation. In addition, 11 up-DEGs and 31 down-DEGs were identified in all developmental stages of yellow rapeseed compared with black seed. Enrichment analysis revealed that many DEGs were involved in biosynthetic processes, pigment metabolism, and oxidation-reduction processes, such as flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, flavone and flavonol biosynthesis, and fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism. We found that more than 77 DEGs were related to flavonoid and lignin biosynthesis, including 4CL, C4H, and PAL, which participated in phenylalanine metabolism, and BAN, CHI/TT5, DFR, F3H, FLS, LDOX, PAP, CHS/TT4, TT5, bHLH/TT8, WD40, MYB, TCP, and CYP, which were involved in flavonoid biosynthesis. Most of these DEGs were downregulated in yellow rapeseed and were consistent with the decreased flavonoid and lignin contents. Both up- and down-DEGs related to fatty acid biosynthesis and metabolism were also analyzed, which could help to explain the improved oil content of yellow rapeseed.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This research provided comprehensive transcriptome data for yellow-seeded B. napus with a unique genetic background, and all the DEGs in comparison with the black-seeded counterpart could help to explain seed quality differences, such as lower pigmentation and lignin contents, and higher oil content.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31096923
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1821-z
pii: 10.1186/s12870-019-1821-z
pmc: PMC6524335
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fatty Acids
0
Flavonoids
0
Lignin
9005-53-2
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
203Références
Theor Appl Genet. 2003 Aug;107(3):528-39
pubmed: 12721639
Plant Mol Biol. 2004 May;55(3):343-67
pubmed: 15604686
Bioinformatics. 2005 Oct 1;21(19):3787-93
pubmed: 15817693
Genome. 2005 Aug;48(4):755-60
pubmed: 16094443
Chromosome Res. 2005;13(8):819-26
pubmed: 16331413
J Plant Physiol. 2007 Mar;164(3):350-63
pubmed: 16618519
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:405-30
pubmed: 16669768
Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Nov;113(7):1211-20
pubmed: 16960718
Mol Biol Rep. 2007 Jun;34(2):105-20
pubmed: 17115250
Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Jan;12(1):29-36
pubmed: 17161643
Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Nov;115(8):1101-7
pubmed: 17846742
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Feb;116(4):491-9
pubmed: 18075728
Nat Methods. 2008 Jul;5(7):621-8
pubmed: 18516045
Mol Genet Genomics. 2009 Jan;281(1):109-23
pubmed: 19018571
Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
pubmed: 19289445
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Sep;32(9):1211-29
pubmed: 19389052
Plant Physiol. 2009 Nov;151(3):1617-34
pubmed: 19755540
Planta. 2009 Nov;230(6):1167-83
pubmed: 19760260
Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14
pubmed: 20132535
Plant Cell. 2010 Mar;22(3):811-31
pubmed: 20215589
Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):511-5
pubmed: 20436464
Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R106
pubmed: 20979621
Gene. 2011 Sep 15;484(1-2):61-8
pubmed: 21683773
Genome Res. 2011 Sep;21(9):1543-51
pubmed: 21816910
J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Mar 7;60(9):2248-56
pubmed: 22296210
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 May;124(8):1573-86
pubmed: 22350089
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Jun;125(1):19-32
pubmed: 22350176
Genome. 2012 Dec;55(12):813-23
pubmed: 23231600
J Sci Food Agric. 2013 Jun;93(8):1898-902
pubmed: 23238899
J Appl Genet. 2013 May;54(2):135-45
pubmed: 23329015
Plant Physiol. 2013 Apr;161(4):1656-69
pubmed: 23424250
J Proteome Res. 2013 Apr 5;12(4):1743-53
pubmed: 23438466
J Integr Plant Biol. 2013 Jun;55(6):537-51
pubmed: 23445079
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 22;8(4):e61247
pubmed: 23613820
Genome Biol. 2013 Apr 25;14(4):R36
pubmed: 23618408
J Exp Bot. 2013 Jul;64(10):2885-98
pubmed: 23698630
Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Sep;18(9):477-83
pubmed: 23870661
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 19;8(8):e71110
pubmed: 23990927
Plant J. 2013 Dec;76(6):901-13
pubmed: 24118612
Am J Bot. 2013 Dec;100(12):2458-67
pubmed: 24197179
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 04;8(11):e78484
pubmed: 24223813
New Phytol. 2014 Apr;202(1):132-44
pubmed: 24299194
J Integr Plant Biol. 2014 Sep;56(9):887-901
pubmed: 24304637
Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(1):e27522
pubmed: 24393776
Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9(1):e27639
pubmed: 24394987
Plant Physiol. 2014 May 19;165(3):1315-1327
pubmed: 24843076
Planta. 2014 Nov;240(5):955-70
pubmed: 24903359
Science. 2014 Aug 22;345(6199):950-3
pubmed: 25146293
Plant Physiol. 2015 Aug;168(4):1527-36
pubmed: 26082402
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374:339-61
pubmed: 26519415
Molecules. 2015 Nov 30;20(12):21204-13
pubmed: 26633322
Plant Sci. 2017 Jan;254:32-47
pubmed: 27964783
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 06;7:1755
pubmed: 27999578
J Agric Food Chem. 2017 Jul 5;65(26):5229-5237
pubmed: 28650150
J Exp Bot. 2017 Oct 13;68(17):4791-4801
pubmed: 28992309
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Oct 05;8:1674
pubmed: 29051765
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Dec 11;8:2100
pubmed: 29321786
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 24;19(2):null
pubmed: 29364145
Plant Physiol. 2018 May;177(1):208-215
pubmed: 29626162
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 23;8(1):6373
pubmed: 29686299
Molecules. 2018 Jul 21;23(7):null
pubmed: 30037115
Plant J. 2019 Jan;97(2):296-305
pubmed: 30288819
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):266
pubmed: 30400863
BMC Genomics. 2018 Dec 20;19(1):951
pubmed: 30572838
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 4;14(2):e0209982
pubmed: 30716096
Plant Physiol. 1999 Jan;119(1):353-62
pubmed: 9880378