Infection Risks Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Fingolimod, Natalizumab, Rituximab, and Injectable Therapies.
Adult
Female
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
/ therapeutic use
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents
/ therapeutic use
Incidence
Infections
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
/ complications
Natalizumab
/ therapeutic use
Registries
Rituximab
/ therapeutic use
Sweden
/ epidemiology
Journal
JAMA neurology
ISSN: 2168-6157
Titre abrégé: JAMA Neurol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2020
01 02 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
8
10
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
8
10
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although highly effective disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) have been associated with an increased risk of infections vs injectable therapies interferon beta and glatiramer acetate (GA), the magnitude of potential risk increase is not well established in real-world populations. Even less is known about infection risk associated with rituximab, which is extensively used off-label to treat MS in Sweden. To examine the risk of serious infections associated with disease-modifying treatments for MS. This nationwide register-based cohort study was conducted in Sweden from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2017. National registers with prospective data collection from the public health care system were used. All Swedish patients with relapsing-remitting MS whose data were recorded in the Swedish MS register as initiating treatment with rituximab, natalizumab, fingolimod, or interferon beta and GA and an age-matched and sex-matched general population comparator cohort were included. Treatment with rituximab, natalizumab, fingolimod, and interferon beta and GA. Serious infections were defined as all infections resulting in hospitalization. Additional outcomes included outpatient treatment with antibiotic or herpes antiviral medications. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated in Cox regressions. A total of 6421 patients (3260 taking rituximab, 1588 taking natalizumab, 1535 taking fingolimod, and 2217 taking interferon beta/GA) were included, plus a comparator cohort of 42 645 individuals. Among 6421 patients with 8600 treatment episodes, the mean (SD) age at treatment start ranged from 35.0 (10.1) years to 40.4 (10.6) years; 6186 patients were female. The crude rate of infections was higher in patients with MS taking interferon beta and GA than the general population (incidence rate, 8.9 [95% CI, 6.4-12.1] vs 5.2 [95% CI, 4.8-5.5] per 1000 person-years), and higher still in patients taking fingolimod (incidence rate, 14.3 [95% CI, 10.8-18.5] per 1000 person-years), natalizumab (incidence rate, 11.4 [95% CI, 8.3-15.3] per 1000 person-years), and rituximab (incidence rate, 19.7 [95% CI, 16.4-23.5] per 1000 person-years). After confounder adjustment, the rate remained significantly higher for rituximab (HR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.11-2.61]) but not fingolimod (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.84-2.03]) or natalizumab (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.71-1.77]) compared with interferon beta and GA. In contrast, use of herpes antiviral drugs during rituximab treatment was similar to that of interferon beta and GA and lower than that of natalizumab (HR, 1.82 [1.34-2.46]) and fingolimod (HR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.27-2.32]). Patients with MS are at a generally increased risk of infections, and this differs by treatment. The rate of infections was lowest with interferon beta and GA; among newer treatments, off-label use of rituximab was associated with the highest rate of serious infections. The different risk profiles should inform the risk-benefit assessments of these treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31589278
pii: 2752284
doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3365
pmc: PMC6784753
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immunosuppressive Agents
0
Natalizumab
0
Rituximab
4F4X42SYQ6
Fingolimod Hydrochloride
G926EC510T
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
184-191Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2021 May;50:102842
pubmed: 33610957
J Intern Med. 2014 Apr;275(4):350-63
pubmed: 24444048
Epidemiology. 2019 Mar;30(2):230-233
pubmed: 30721167
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):402-15
pubmed: 20089954
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 03;9(2):e87379
pubmed: 24498318
Acta Neurol Scand. 2015;132(199):11-9
pubmed: 26046553
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):209-220
pubmed: 28002688
J Neurol Sci. 2015;353(1-2):155-7
pubmed: 25908254
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Mar;78(3):320-327
pubmed: 30612115
JAMA Neurol. 2015 Jan;72(1):31-9
pubmed: 25419615
Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):168-186
pubmed: 27891572
J Intern Med. 2014 Apr;275(4):364-81
pubmed: 24444084
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2017 Sep 22;17(11):88
pubmed: 28940162
Stat Med. 2009 Jul 10;28(15):1982-98
pubmed: 19452569
Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jun;77(6):905-910
pubmed: 29592917
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1153-60
pubmed: 23496086
Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Apr;12(4):217-33
pubmed: 26943779
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;89(10):1050-1056
pubmed: 29602795
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-234
pubmed: 28002679
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
Neurology. 2016 Nov 15;87(20):2074-2081
pubmed: 27760868
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jul;16(7):726-35
pubmed: 16897791