Highly Sensitive Blocker Displacement Amplification and Droplet Digital PCR Reveal Low-Level Parental FOXF1 Somatic Mosaicism in Families with Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins.
Alleles
Amino Acid Substitution
DNA Copy Number Variations
DNA Mutational Analysis
Female
Forkhead Transcription Factors
/ genetics
Genotype
Humans
Male
Mosaicism
Pedigree
Persistent Fetal Circulation Syndrome
/ diagnosis
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Pulmonary Alveoli
/ abnormalities
Pulmonary Veins
/ abnormalities
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Journal
The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD
ISSN: 1943-7811
Titre abrégé: J Mol Diagn
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100893612
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
09
08
2019
revised:
30
10
2019
accepted:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
10
2
2020
medline:
5
6
2021
entrez:
10
2
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Detection of low-level somatic mosaicism [alternate allele fraction (AAF) ≤ 10%] in parents of affected individuals with the apparent de novo pathogenic variants enables more accurate estimate of recurrence risk. To date, only a few systematic analyses of low-level parental somatic mosaicism have been performed. Herein, highly sensitive blocker displacement amplification, droplet digital PCR, quantitative PCR, long-range PCR, and array comparative genomic hybridization were applied in families with alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins. We screened 18 unrelated families with the FOXF1 variant previously determined to be apparent de novo (n = 14), of unknown parental origin (n = 1), or inherited from a parent suspected to be somatic and/or germline mosaic (n = 3). We identified four (22%) families with FOXF1 parental somatic mosaic single-nucleotide variants (n = 3) and copy number variant deletion (n = 1) detected in parental blood samples and an AAF ranging between 0.03% and 19%. In one family, mosaic allele ratio in tissues originating from three germ layers ranged between <0.03% and 0.65%. Because the ratio of parental somatic mosaicism have significant implications for the recurrence risk, this study further implies the importance of a systematic screening of parental samples for low-level and very-low-level (AAF ≤ 1%) somatic mosaicism using methods that are more sensitive than those routinely applied in diagnostics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32036090
pii: S1525-1578(20)30012-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.12.007
pmc: PMC7193866
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
FOXF1 protein, human
0
Forkhead Transcription Factors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
447-456Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA203964
Pays : United States
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD087292
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL137203
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Front Genet. 2018 Oct 17;9:479
pubmed: 30386378
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Apr;21(4):474-7
pubmed: 22990143
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul 15;184(2):172-9
pubmed: 21471096
Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Oct;14(10):703-18
pubmed: 24022702
Genet Med. 2019 Jul;21(7):1568-1575
pubmed: 30474650
Schizophr Res. 2018 Jul;197:583-584
pubmed: 29195747
Yonsei Med J. 2017 May;58(3):672-675
pubmed: 28332379
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Sep;51(9):921-7
pubmed: 27145217
Pediatr Pathol. 1991 Jan-Feb;11(1):163-70
pubmed: 2014189
J Med Genet. 2019 Feb;56(2):75-80
pubmed: 30368457
Pediatr Res. 2017 Apr;81(4):632-638
pubmed: 27855150
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Jul;170(7):1942-4
pubmed: 27109257
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 15;7(1):15677
pubmed: 29142202
Am J Clin Pathol. 1981 Nov;76(5):722-7
pubmed: 7293984
Hum Mutat. 2013 Jun;34(6):801-11
pubmed: 23505205
Pediatr Res. 2018 Feb;83(2):477-483
pubmed: 29569581
Nat Genet. 2018 Dec;50(12):1674-1680
pubmed: 30397338
Hum Mutat. 2017 Jun;38(6):615-620
pubmed: 28256047
Hum Genet. 2016 May;135(5):569-586
pubmed: 27071622
Pediatr Int. 2016 Dec;58(12):1371-1372
pubmed: 28008732
Mol Genet Genomics. 2016 Apr;291(2):513-30
pubmed: 26481646
J Pediatr. 2004 Nov;145(5):646-51
pubmed: 15520767
Genome Res. 2013 Jan;23(1):23-33
pubmed: 23034409
Cell. 2012 Dec 21;151(7):1431-42
pubmed: 23260136
Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jul 2;97(1):67-74
pubmed: 26054435
Cell Res. 2014 Nov;24(11):1311-27
pubmed: 25312340
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Jun;84(6):780-91
pubmed: 19500772
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 5;10(1):2985
pubmed: 31278258
Trends Genet. 2015 Jul;31(7):382-92
pubmed: 25910407
Nat Genet. 2016 Feb;48(2):126-133
pubmed: 26656846
Nature. 2017 Mar 30;543(7647):714-718
pubmed: 28329761
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 15;200(8):1045-1056
pubmed: 31199666
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Aug;164A(8):2013-9
pubmed: 24842713
Genome Med. 2019 Jul 26;11(1):48
pubmed: 31349857
Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:714-723
pubmed: 29805844
Am J Med Genet A. 2018 Dec;176(12):2877-2881
pubmed: 30380203
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 21;371(8):733-43
pubmed: 25140959
Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug 7;95(2):173-82
pubmed: 25087610