Gene expression profiling identifies pathways involved in seed maturation of Jatropha curcas.


Journal

BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 01 08 2019
accepted: 11 03 2020
entrez: 11 4 2020
pubmed: 11 4 2020
medline: 19 12 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Jatropha curcas, a tropical shrub, is a promising biofuel crop, which produces seeds with high content of oil and protein. To better understand the maturation process of J. curcas seeds and to improve its agronomic performance, a two-step approach was performed in six different maturation stages of seeds: 1) generation of the entire transcriptome of J. curcas seeds using 454-Roche sequencing of a cDNA library, 2) comparison of transcriptional expression levels using a custom Agilent 8x60K oligonucleotide microarray. A total of 793,875 high-quality reads were assembled into 19,382 unique full-length contigs, of which 13,507 could be annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Microarray data analysis identified 9111 probes (out of 57,842 probes), which were differentially expressed between the six maturation stages. The expression results were validated for 75 selected transcripts based on expression levels, predicted function, pathway, and length. Result from cluster analyses showed that transcripts associated with fatty acid, flavonoid, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were over-represented in the early stages, while those of lipid storage were over-represented in the late stages. Expression analyses of different maturation stages of J. curcas seed showed that most changes in transcript abundance occurred between the two last stages, suggesting that the timing of metabolic pathways during seed maturation in J. curcas occurs in late stages. The co-expression results showed that the hubs (CB5-D, CDR1, TT8, DFR, HVA22) with the highest number of edges, associated with fatty acid and flavonoid biosynthesis, are showing a decrease in their expression during seed maturation. Furthermore, seed development and hormone pathways are significantly well connected. The obtained results revealed differentially expressed sequences (DESs) regulating important pathways related to seed maturation, which could contribute to the understanding of the complex regulatory network during seed maturation with the focus on lipid, flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. This study provides detailed information on transcriptional changes during J. curcas seed maturation and provides a starting point for a genomic survey of seed quality traits. The results highlighted specific genes and processes relevant to the molecular mechanisms involved in Jatropha seed maturation. These data can also be utilized regarding other Euphorbiaceae species.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Jatropha curcas, a tropical shrub, is a promising biofuel crop, which produces seeds with high content of oil and protein. To better understand the maturation process of J. curcas seeds and to improve its agronomic performance, a two-step approach was performed in six different maturation stages of seeds: 1) generation of the entire transcriptome of J. curcas seeds using 454-Roche sequencing of a cDNA library, 2) comparison of transcriptional expression levels using a custom Agilent 8x60K oligonucleotide microarray.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 793,875 high-quality reads were assembled into 19,382 unique full-length contigs, of which 13,507 could be annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Microarray data analysis identified 9111 probes (out of 57,842 probes), which were differentially expressed between the six maturation stages. The expression results were validated for 75 selected transcripts based on expression levels, predicted function, pathway, and length. Result from cluster analyses showed that transcripts associated with fatty acid, flavonoid, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis were over-represented in the early stages, while those of lipid storage were over-represented in the late stages. Expression analyses of different maturation stages of J. curcas seed showed that most changes in transcript abundance occurred between the two last stages, suggesting that the timing of metabolic pathways during seed maturation in J. curcas occurs in late stages. The co-expression results showed that the hubs (CB5-D, CDR1, TT8, DFR, HVA22) with the highest number of edges, associated with fatty acid and flavonoid biosynthesis, are showing a decrease in their expression during seed maturation. Furthermore, seed development and hormone pathways are significantly well connected.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The obtained results revealed differentially expressed sequences (DESs) regulating important pathways related to seed maturation, which could contribute to the understanding of the complex regulatory network during seed maturation with the focus on lipid, flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. This study provides detailed information on transcriptional changes during J. curcas seed maturation and provides a starting point for a genomic survey of seed quality traits. The results highlighted specific genes and processes relevant to the molecular mechanisms involved in Jatropha seed maturation. These data can also be utilized regarding other Euphorbiaceae species.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32272887
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6666-1
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-6666-1
pmc: PMC7146973
doi:

Substances chimiques

Plant Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

290

Subventions

Organisme : Austrian Science Fund
ID : P 23836

Références

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 13;111(19):7150-5
pubmed: 24778257
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Apr 8;15(4):e1006650
pubmed: 30958812
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0126250
pubmed: 25965272
DNA Res. 2011 Feb;18(1):65-76
pubmed: 21149391
Int J Mol Sci. 2008 Feb;9(2):169-80
pubmed: 19325741
Plant Physiol. 2006 Nov;142(3):839-54
pubmed: 16963520
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 2;107(5):2361-6
pubmed: 20133881
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2693
pubmed: 30804440
Bioinformatics. 2007 Nov 1;23(21):2947-8
pubmed: 17846036
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1993 May 15;303(1):145-51
pubmed: 8489257
Methods Mol Biol. 2000;132:365-86
pubmed: 10547847
Plant Biotechnol J. 2013 Oct;11(8):986-96
pubmed: 23898859
Biotechnol J. 2013 Oct;8(10):1172-82
pubmed: 24092674
Int J Mol Sci. 2015 Aug 14;16(8):19248-90
pubmed: 26287177
Plant J. 2015 Mar;81(5):810-21
pubmed: 25603894
Nat Genet. 2013 Jan;45(1):43-50
pubmed: 23242369
Plant Physiol Biochem. 1999 Nov;37(11):831-840
pubmed: 10580283
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2008 May;21(5):507-17
pubmed: 18393610
Plant Cell. 2007 Jan;19(1):182-95
pubmed: 17220197
Nature. 2010 Sep 2;467(7311):52-8
pubmed: 20811451
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jun 6;18(1):443
pubmed: 28587590
BMC Genomics. 2008 Dec 19;9:619
pubmed: 19099582
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W116-20
pubmed: 15980438
Arabidopsis Book. 2011;9:e0153
pubmed: 22303277
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Dec 06;7:1755
pubmed: 27999578
J Proteomics. 2013 Oct 8;91:23-40
pubmed: 23835435
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;23(2):257-8
pubmed: 17098774
Plant J. 2004 Nov;40(4):575-85
pubmed: 15500472
Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Sep;14(9):1883-98
pubmed: 26914183
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 04;20(11):
pubmed: 31167353
BMC Syst Biol. 2007 Aug 06;1:37
pubmed: 17683609
Plant Physiol. 2008 Aug;147(4):1710-22
pubmed: 18583533
J Biol Chem. 2012 Jan 20;287(4):2288-94
pubmed: 22090025
Plant Physiol. 2010 Feb;152(2):670-84
pubmed: 19965969
Plant Cell. 2015 Oct;27(10):2692-708
pubmed: 26410298
J Exp Bot. 2017 Jul 10;68(15):4013-4028
pubmed: 28922752
Molecules. 2019 Jul 04;24(13):
pubmed: 31277395
J Proteome Res. 2015 Jun 5;14(6):2557-68
pubmed: 25920442
Plant Biotechnol J. 2019 Feb;17(2):517-530
pubmed: 30059608
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):1001-1013
pubmed: 12242395
New Phytol. 2005 Sep;167(3):761-76
pubmed: 16101913
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jun 02;12:286
pubmed: 21635767
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Jul 18;5(1):47
pubmed: 22809288
Phytochemistry. 2013 Jan;85:7-29
pubmed: 23153517
Genome Biol. 2014 Feb 27;15(2):R39
pubmed: 24576357
Plant Cell. 2019 Jun;31(6):1344-1366
pubmed: 30962392
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30100
pubmed: 22319559
Cell Stress Chaperones. 2013 Jul;18(4):427-37
pubmed: 23264228
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1962:227-245
pubmed: 31020564
Plant Physiol. 2001 Jun;126(2):789-800
pubmed: 11402207
Plant Cell. 2009 Dec;21(12):3885-901
pubmed: 20040537
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Oct 22;9:1479
pubmed: 30405653
Plant Cell. 2005 Nov;17(11):3094-110
pubmed: 16199613
PLoS One. 2014 May 16;9(5):e97878
pubmed: 24837971
Plant J. 2012 Jan;69(1):37-46
pubmed: 21883555
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Oct;7(10):e1002195
pubmed: 22039361
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012 Feb 29;5(1):10
pubmed: 22377043
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2014 Apr;20(2):181-90
pubmed: 24757322
Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 15;21(18):3674-6
pubmed: 16081474
Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Feb;27(3):441-56
pubmed: 7894010
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):29-34
pubmed: 9847135
Plant Physiol. 2015 Dec;169(4):2409-21
pubmed: 26491147
BMC Res Notes. 2010 Oct 07;3:255
pubmed: 20929528
Mol Plant. 2016 Mar 7;9(3):338-355
pubmed: 26902186
BMC Genomics. 2010 Aug 06;11:462
pubmed: 20691070
Plant J. 1999 Jul;19(1):9-20
pubmed: 10417722
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30987
pubmed: 22363528
Plant J. 2009 Nov;60(3):476-87
pubmed: 19594710
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
pubmed: 9254694
Plant Physiol. 2014 Apr 10;165(2):905-916
pubmed: 24722549
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37(Database issue):D274-8
pubmed: 19022853
J Exp Bot. 2005 May;56(415):1285-96
pubmed: 15767324
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Nov 01;9:1610
pubmed: 30443262
J Plant Physiol. 2011 Nov 15;168(17):2015-20
pubmed: 21803444
Mol Plant. 2014 Oct;7(10):1522-32
pubmed: 24851876
Biochem J. 1992 Oct 1;287 ( Pt 1):141-4
pubmed: 1417766
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36522
pubmed: 22574177
Plant Sci. 2011 Dec;181(6):696-700
pubmed: 21958712
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38653
pubmed: 22723874
BMC Genomics. 2013 Dec 01;14:840
pubmed: 24289287
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D1182-7
pubmed: 24174544
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D1167-71
pubmed: 23161682
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2003 Feb;68(2):135-43
pubmed: 12538077
Plant J. 2011 Mar;65(5):675-89
pubmed: 21223397
Plant Cell. 2004 Nov;16(11):3002-19
pubmed: 15486098

Auteurs

Fatemeh Maghuly (F)

Plant Functional Genomics, Department of Biotechnology, BOKU-VIBT, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Vienna, Austria. fatemeh.maghuly@boku.ac.at.

Tamás Deák (T)

Department of Viticulture, Szent István University, Villányi út 29-43, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.

Klemens Vierlinger (K)

Center for Health and Bioresources, Molecular Diagnostics, Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT), Giefinggasse 4, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Stephan Pabinger (S)

Center for Health and Bioresources, Molecular Diagnostics, Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT), Giefinggasse 4, 1210, Vienna, Austria.

Hakim Tafer (H)

Austrian Center of Biological Resources (ACBR), Department of Biotechnology, BOKU-VIBT, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Vienna, Austria.

Margit Laimer (M)

Plant Biotechnology Unit, Department of Biotechnology, BOKU-VIBT, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, 1190, Vienna, Austria.

Articles similaires

Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Humans Colorectal Neoplasms Biomarkers, Tumor Prognosis Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic
Animals Lung India Sheep Transcriptome

Classifications MeSH