Detection of microbial cell-free DNA in maternal and umbilical cord plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis using next generation sequencing.
Adult
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
/ blood
Chorioamnionitis
/ diagnosis
Cohort Studies
Female
Fetal Blood
/ chemistry
Gestational Age
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
/ methods
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Mycoplasma
/ genetics
Neonatal Sepsis
/ blood
Pregnancy
Sequence Analysis, DNA
/ methods
Streptococcus mitis
/ genetics
Umbilical Cord
/ microbiology
Ureaplasma
/ genetics
Young Adult
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
entrez:
16
4
2020
pubmed:
16
4
2020
medline:
15
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chorioamnionitis has been linked to spontaneous preterm labor and complications such as neonatal sepsis. We hypothesized that microbial cell-free (cf) DNA would be detectable in maternal plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis and could be the basis for a non-invasive method to detect fetal exposure to microorganisms. The purpose of this study was to determine whether next generation sequencing could detect microbial cfDNA in maternal plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis. Maternal plasma (n = 94) and umbilical cord plasma (n = 120) were collected during delivery at gestational age 28-41 weeks. cfDNA was extracted and sequenced. Umbilical cord plasma samples with evidence of contamination were excluded. The prevalence of microorganisms previously implicated in choriomanionitis, neonatal sepsis and intra-amniotic infections, as described in the literature, were examined to determine if there was enrichment of these microorganisms in this cohort. Specific microbial cfDNA associated with chorioamnionitis was first detected in umbilical cord plasma and confirmed in the matched maternal plasma samples (n = 77 matched pairs) among 14 cases of histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis and one case of clinical chorioamnionitis; 63 paired samples were used as controls. A correlation of rank of a given microorganism across maternal plasma and matched umbilical cord plasma was used to assess whether signals found in umbilical cord plasma were also present in maternal plasma. Microbial DNA sequences associated with clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis were enriched in maternal plasma in cases with suspected chorioamnionitis when compared to controls (12/14 microorganisms, p = 0.02). Analysis of the microbial cfDNA in umbilical cord plasma among the 1,251 microorganisms detectable with this assay identified Streptococcus mitis, Ureaplasma spp., and Mycoplasma spp. in cases of suspected chorioamnionitis. This assay also detected cfDNA from Lactobacillus spp. in controls. Comparison between maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma confirmed these signatures were also present in maternal plasma. Unbiased analysis of microorganisms with significantly correlated signal between matched maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma identified the above listed 3 microorganisms, all of which have previously been implicated in patients with chorioamnionitis (Mycoplasma hominis p = 0.0001; Ureaplasma parvum p = 0.002; Streptococcus mitis p = 0.007). These data show that the pathogen signal relevant for chorioamnionitis can be identified in both maternal and umbilical cord plasma. This is the first report showing the detection of relevant microbial cell-free cfDNA in maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma in patients with clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis. These results may lead to the development of a specific assay to detect perinatal infections for targeted therapy to reduce early neonatal sepsis complications.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Chorioamnionitis has been linked to spontaneous preterm labor and complications such as neonatal sepsis. We hypothesized that microbial cell-free (cf) DNA would be detectable in maternal plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis and could be the basis for a non-invasive method to detect fetal exposure to microorganisms.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine whether next generation sequencing could detect microbial cfDNA in maternal plasma in patients with chorioamnionitis.
STUDY DESIGN
Maternal plasma (n = 94) and umbilical cord plasma (n = 120) were collected during delivery at gestational age 28-41 weeks. cfDNA was extracted and sequenced. Umbilical cord plasma samples with evidence of contamination were excluded. The prevalence of microorganisms previously implicated in choriomanionitis, neonatal sepsis and intra-amniotic infections, as described in the literature, were examined to determine if there was enrichment of these microorganisms in this cohort. Specific microbial cfDNA associated with chorioamnionitis was first detected in umbilical cord plasma and confirmed in the matched maternal plasma samples (n = 77 matched pairs) among 14 cases of histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis and one case of clinical chorioamnionitis; 63 paired samples were used as controls. A correlation of rank of a given microorganism across maternal plasma and matched umbilical cord plasma was used to assess whether signals found in umbilical cord plasma were also present in maternal plasma.
RESULTS
Microbial DNA sequences associated with clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis were enriched in maternal plasma in cases with suspected chorioamnionitis when compared to controls (12/14 microorganisms, p = 0.02). Analysis of the microbial cfDNA in umbilical cord plasma among the 1,251 microorganisms detectable with this assay identified Streptococcus mitis, Ureaplasma spp., and Mycoplasma spp. in cases of suspected chorioamnionitis. This assay also detected cfDNA from Lactobacillus spp. in controls. Comparison between maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma confirmed these signatures were also present in maternal plasma. Unbiased analysis of microorganisms with significantly correlated signal between matched maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma identified the above listed 3 microorganisms, all of which have previously been implicated in patients with chorioamnionitis (Mycoplasma hominis p = 0.0001; Ureaplasma parvum p = 0.002; Streptococcus mitis p = 0.007). These data show that the pathogen signal relevant for chorioamnionitis can be identified in both maternal and umbilical cord plasma.
CONCLUSION
This is the first report showing the detection of relevant microbial cell-free cfDNA in maternal plasma and umbilical cord plasma in patients with clinical and/or histological chorioamnionitis. These results may lead to the development of a specific assay to detect perinatal infections for targeted therapy to reduce early neonatal sepsis complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32294121
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231239
pii: PONE-D-19-24209
pmc: PMC7159194
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231239Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI116880
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
LB, MJR, SB and SZ are or were employees of Karius, Inc. MJR is also employed by D2G Oncology. RGW, MF, QHN, RR and TCM have no conflict of interest. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Clin Perinatol. 2010 Jun;37(2):339-54
pubmed: 20569811
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;94(2):188-191
pubmed: 30819624
BJOG. 2017 Apr;124(5):775-783
pubmed: 27365145
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015 May;13(5):269-84
pubmed: 25853778
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016 Dec 14;30(1):349-379
pubmed: 27974410
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4 Suppl):S29-52
pubmed: 26428501
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 22;7(1):12171
pubmed: 28939908
J Clin Med. 2014 Jul 08;3(3):741-6
pubmed: 26237475
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):992-8
pubmed: 24799549
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1500-7
pubmed: 10816189
Lancet. 1997 Aug 16;350(9076):485-7
pubmed: 9274585
PLoS Med. 2016 Dec 27;13(12):e1002205
pubmed: 28027295
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;92(3):210-213
pubmed: 30017314
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 May;100(3):F248-9
pubmed: 25079114
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1382-8
pubmed: 1595794
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016 Sep;35(3):347-76
pubmed: 27392603
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;191(1):211-6
pubmed: 15295368
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13336-41
pubmed: 26460048
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):218-24
pubmed: 9915961
J Perinat Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):19-36
pubmed: 25720095
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Jul;28(11):1343-1359
pubmed: 25123515
JAMA. 2005 Feb 16;293(7):843-9
pubmed: 15713774
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;166(5):1515-28
pubmed: 1595807
Nat Microbiol. 2019 Apr;4(4):663-674
pubmed: 30742071
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):909-12
pubmed: 10831982
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(1):24-38
pubmed: 22384517
JAMA. 2011 Aug 10;306(6):627-36
pubmed: 21828326
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 1;7(9):9707-17
pubmed: 26848768
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Feb;168(2):137-47
pubmed: 24378638
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013 Oct 16;3:58
pubmed: 24137568
Anaerobe. 2018 Apr;50:55-59
pubmed: 29409815
PLoS One. 2008 Aug 26;3(8):e3056
pubmed: 18725970
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 May;82(5):423-31
pubmed: 12752072
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014 Nov;72(5):458-74
pubmed: 25078709
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):604.e1-604.e11
pubmed: 28257964
Lancet. 1998 Dec 12;352(9144):1904-5
pubmed: 9863792
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Aug;28(12):1394-409
pubmed: 25190175
Prenat Diagn. 2000 Oct;20(10):795-8
pubmed: 11038456
J Infect Dis. 1978 Dec;138(6):791-7
pubmed: 739158
Prenat Diagn. 2002 Sep;22(9):783-5
pubmed: 12224071