Evolutionary Variability of W-Linked Repetitive Content in Lacertid Lizards.
Animals
Chromosome Banding
Chromosomes
/ genetics
Evolution, Molecular
Female
Heterochromatin
/ genetics
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Karyotype
Lizards
/ genetics
Male
Microsatellite Repeats
/ genetics
Nucleotide Motifs
Phylogeny
Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid
Sex Chromosomes
/ genetics
Species Specificity
Telomere
/ genetics
C-banding
FISH
GATA
evolution
heterochromatin
karyotype
microsatellites
sex chromosomes
telomeres
Journal
Genes
ISSN: 2073-4425
Titre abrégé: Genes (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101551097
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 05 2020
11 05 2020
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
revised:
04
05
2020
accepted:
08
05
2020
entrez:
15
5
2020
pubmed:
15
5
2020
medline:
16
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lacertid lizards are a widely radiated group of squamate reptiles with long-term stable ZZ/ZW sex chromosomes. Despite their family-wide homology of Z-specific gene content, previous cytogenetic studies revealed significant variability in the size, morphology, and heterochromatin distribution of their W chromosome. However, there is little evidence about the accumulation and distribution of repetitive content on lacertid chromosomes, especially on their W chromosome. In order to expand our knowledge of the evolution of sex chromosome repetitive content, we examined the topology of telomeric and microsatellite motifs that tend to often accumulate on the sex chromosomes of reptiles in the karyotypes of 15 species of lacertids by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The topology of the above-mentioned motifs was compared to the pattern of heterochromatin distribution, as revealed by C-banding. Our results show that the topologies of the examined motifs on the W chromosome do not seem to follow a strong phylogenetic signal, indicating independent and species-specific accumulations. In addition, the degeneration of the W chromosome can also affect the Z chromosome and potentially also other parts of the genome. Our study provides solid evidence that the repetitive content of the degenerated sex chromosomes is one of the most evolutionary dynamic parts of the genome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32403257
pii: genes11050531
doi: 10.3390/genes11050531
pmc: PMC7290949
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Heterochromatin
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 9;10(1):4077
pubmed: 31501432
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2014;144(2):131-41
pubmed: 25402553
Comp Cytogenet. 2019 May 14;13(2):121-132
pubmed: 31149328
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;147(1):48-54
pubmed: 26575989
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2014;142(3):190-6
pubmed: 24603160
Genetica. 2010 Oct;138(9-10):1085-98
pubmed: 20830505
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 Dec;3(12):1632-1641
pubmed: 31768022
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 07;10(8):e0134985
pubmed: 26252002
Nat Ecol Evol. 2019 May;3(5):834-844
pubmed: 30936435
Chromosoma. 1980;79(2):137-57
pubmed: 7398495
Cell. 2014 Nov 6;159(4):800-13
pubmed: 25417157
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Jul;117(1):8-13
pubmed: 26980341
Evolution. 2014 Apr;68(4):1027-41
pubmed: 24279795
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2018 Mar;330(2):83-95
pubmed: 29424472
Zoology (Jena). 2018 Feb;126:98-102
pubmed: 29287619
Chromosoma. 2016 Jun;125(3):553-71
pubmed: 26715206
PLoS Biol. 2010 Sep 28;8(9):
pubmed: 20927412
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2017;153(2):86-95
pubmed: 29183018
Nat Genet. 1994 Apr;6(4):342-7
pubmed: 8054973
Heredity (Edinb). 2019 Aug;123(2):215-227
pubmed: 30670841
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Dec 1;34(12):3186-3204
pubmed: 29029271
Tsitologiia. 1973 Oct;15(10):1291-6
pubmed: 4780025
ILAR J. 1998;39(2-3):68-76
pubmed: 11528066
Mol Cytogenet. 2011 Oct 12;4:22
pubmed: 21992653
Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Aug;95(2):118-28
pubmed: 15931241
Comp Cytogenet. 2016 Sep 8;10(3):387-399
pubmed: 27830048
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e95226
pubmed: 24743344
J Hered. 2015 Nov-Dec;106(6):753-7
pubmed: 26464091
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 22;282(1821):20151992
pubmed: 26702042
Genes (Basel). 2017 Dec 28;9(1):
pubmed: 29283388
Genetica. 2006 Sep-Nov;128(1-3):167-75
pubmed: 17028949
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 10;7:42150
pubmed: 28186115
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020;160(3):134-140
pubmed: 32092753
Chromosome Res. 2015 Sep;23(3):561-70
pubmed: 26474787
Nature. 2014 Apr 24;508(7497):488-93
pubmed: 24759410
Trends Genet. 2011 Sep;27(9):350-7
pubmed: 21962970
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):389-91
pubmed: 17573147
Tsitologiia. 1970 Dec;12(12):1582-5
pubmed: 5512968
BMC Genet. 2011 Oct 20;12:90
pubmed: 22013909
Genes (Basel). 2019 Aug 20;10(8):
pubmed: 31434289
Chromosoma. 1976 Dec 6;59(1):43-62
pubmed: 1001165
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Nov 28;103(48):18190-5
pubmed: 17110446
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;122(3-4):219-28
pubmed: 19188690
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Jun 1;36(6):1113-1120
pubmed: 30722046
Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):636-8
pubmed: 22417794
Exp Cell Res. 1972 Nov;75(1):304-6
pubmed: 4117921
Mol Ecol. 2019 Jun;28(12):3042-3052
pubmed: 31063656
Sci Rep. 2019 May 24;9(1):7832
pubmed: 31127134
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5633-5642
pubmed: 30819892
Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 06;10(12):
pubmed: 31817782
Chromosoma. 2016 Mar;125(1):111-23
pubmed: 26194100
Biol Lett. 2014 Mar 05;10(3):20131093
pubmed: 24598109
Nature. 2010 Jan 28;463(7280):536-9
pubmed: 20072128
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2016;148(4):284-91
pubmed: 27450879
BMC Evol Biol. 2013 Apr 29;13:93
pubmed: 23627680
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2009;127(2-4):128-42
pubmed: 20215738
Science. 2014 Dec 12;346(6215):1246338
pubmed: 25504727
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jul;25(13):3120-6
pubmed: 27037610
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2019;157(1-2):53-64
pubmed: 30641524