Reducing Ochratoxin A Content in Grape Pomace by Different Methods.
Carboxypeptidases A
/ metabolism
Endopeptidases
/ metabolism
Enzymes
/ metabolism
Food Handling
Food Microbiology
Fruit
/ microbiology
Fungi
/ metabolism
Hot Temperature
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Inactivation, Metabolic
Industrial Waste
Lipase
/ metabolism
Ochratoxins
/ analysis
Pressure
Vitis
/ microbiology
OTA reduction
acid treatment
enzymatic treatment
ochratoxin A
thermal pressure treatment
Journal
Toxins
ISSN: 2072-6651
Titre abrégé: Toxins (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101530765
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 06 2020
27 06 2020
Historique:
received:
25
05
2020
revised:
24
06
2020
accepted:
25
06
2020
entrez:
2
7
2020
pubmed:
2
7
2020
medline:
3
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Grape pomace (GP) is the residue of grapes after wine making and is a valuable source of dietary polyphenol and fiber for health promotion. However, studies found the presence of ochratoxin A (OTA) in GP at very high concentrations, which raises a safety issue in the value-added utilization of GP. This study evaluated the effects of thermal pressure, baking, acid and enzymatic treatments on OTA content in GP. Thermal pressure treatment was conducted with wet GP at 121 °C for 10-30 min in an autoclave; acid treatments were conducted with hydrochloric acid, acetic acid, citric acid, and lactic acid, respectively, at 50 °C for 24 h. Baking was conducted using a cookie model. For enzymatic treatment, purified OTA solution was treated with carboxypeptidase A, alcalase, flavourzyme, pepsin, and lipase, respectively, and the effective enzymes were selected to treat GP. Results show that autoclaving for 10-30 min reduced 19-80% of OTA, varying with treatment time and GP variety. The effectiveness of acid treatment was similar to that of autoclaving and varied with acid type and GP variety. Baking increased the detectable OTA. Among all tested enzymes, carboxypeptidase A was the most effective in reducing OTA, followed by lipase and flavourzyme, but their effects were significantly lower in GP samples.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32605033
pii: toxins12070424
doi: 10.3390/toxins12070424
pmc: PMC7404766
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Enzymes
0
Industrial Waste
0
Ochratoxins
0
ochratoxin A
1779SX6LUY
Lipase
EC 3.1.1.3
Endopeptidases
EC 3.4.-
flavourzyme
EC 3.4.-
Carboxypeptidases A
EC 3.4.17.1
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : USDA-NIFA
ID : 2013-38821-21147
Pays : International
Références
Anim Sci J. 2015 Mar;86(3):260-9
pubmed: 25377644
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996 Apr;137(2):182-92
pubmed: 8661343
Toxins (Basel). 2019 Jun 08;11(6):
pubmed: 31181754
J Agric Food Chem. 2008 Jul 23;56(14):5673-81
pubmed: 18588316
Food Addit Contam. 2005;22 Suppl 1:17-25
pubmed: 16332617
Toxins (Basel). 2010 Jul;2(7):1796-824
pubmed: 22069661
J Food Prot. 2016 Oct;79(10):1748-1752
pubmed: 28221848
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1992 Jan;56(5):741-5
pubmed: 27286200
J Food Prot. 2005 Oct;68(10):2107-11
pubmed: 16245714
J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Sep 4;67(35):9705-9718
pubmed: 31393722
Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jul 04;8(7):
pubmed: 27384585
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Oct 20;119(1-2):140-6
pubmed: 17804104
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 May;99(7):3635-3643
pubmed: 30629293
Mycotoxin Res. 2016 Nov;32(4):179-205
pubmed: 27554261
Mycotoxin Res. 1995 Mar;11(1):37-47
pubmed: 23606034
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2015;55(13):1860-9
pubmed: 24874522
Mycotoxin Res. 2015 May;31(2):83-90
pubmed: 25566949
Toxins (Basel). 2010 Apr;2(4):461-93
pubmed: 22069596
Toxins (Basel). 2015 Oct 22;7(10):4253-82
pubmed: 26506387
Toxins (Basel). 2010 May;2(5):1078-99
pubmed: 22069627
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 26;9:1386
pubmed: 29997599
J Food Prot. 2016 Dec;79(12):2143-2159
pubmed: 28221957
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):1156-8
pubmed: 7793917
J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Jun;48(6):2101-10
pubmed: 10888506