Coexpression Clusters and Allele-Specific Expression in Metabolism-Based Herbicide Resistance.

Amaranthus tuberculatus 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) differential expression analysis nontarget-site resistance (NTSR) single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis

Journal

Genome biology and evolution
ISSN: 1759-6653
Titre abrégé: Genome Biol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101509707

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 12 2020
Historique:
accepted: 06 09 2020
pubmed: 12 9 2020
medline: 6 10 2021
entrez: 11 9 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In the last decade, Amaranthus tuberculatus has evolved resistance to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors in multiple states across the midwestern United States. Two populations resistant to both mode-of-action groups, one from Nebraska (NEB) and one from Illinois (CHR), were studied using an RNA-seq approach on F2 mapping populations to identify the genes responsible for resistance. Using both an A. tuberculatus transcriptome assembly and a high-quality grain amaranth (A. hypochondriacus) genome as references, differential transcript and gene expression analyses were conducted to identify genes that were significantly over- or underexpressed in resistant plants. When these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mapped on the A. hypochondriacus genome, physical clustering of the DEGs was apparent along several of the 16 A. hypochondriacus scaffolds. Furthermore, single-nucleotide polymorphism calling to look for resistant-specific (R) variants, and subsequent mapping of these variants, also found similar patterns of clustering. Specifically, regions biased toward R alleles overlapped with the DEG clusters. Within one of these clusters, allele-specific expression of cytochrome  P450  81E8 was observed for 2,4-D resistance in both the CHR and NEB populations, and phylogenetic analysis indicated a common evolutionary origin of this R allele in the two populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32915951
pii: 5904268
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evaa191
pmc: PMC7738748
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System 9035-51-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2267-2278

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

Références

Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep;163(1):363-77
pubmed: 23872617
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 May 15;29(7):644-52
pubmed: 21572440
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(10):2611-25
pubmed: 18487633
Plant Mol Biol. 2015 Mar;87(4-5):473-87
pubmed: 25636204
Genome Res. 2004 Jun;14(6):1060-7
pubmed: 15173112
Pest Manag Sci. 2010 Apr;66(4):345-8
pubmed: 20063320
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2356-2362
pubmed: 29194949
J Exp Bot. 2016 May;67(11):3223-35
pubmed: 26994475
Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
pubmed: 11846609
BMC Biol. 2017 Aug 31;15(1):74
pubmed: 28854926
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1-11.10.33
pubmed: 25431634
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 May 6;19(1):182
pubmed: 31060501
Nat Rev Genet. 2014 Feb;15(2):69-81
pubmed: 24342920
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 15;14(4):e0215431
pubmed: 30986256
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1658-9
pubmed: 16731699
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Oct;15(10):1238-1249
pubmed: 28218978
Nat Genet. 2000 Oct;26(2):183-6
pubmed: 11017073
Nat Methods. 2017 Jul;14(7):687-690
pubmed: 28581496
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Dec;74(12):2688-2698
pubmed: 29797476
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7
pubmed: 27043002
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Feb 02;9:60
pubmed: 29456544
Trends Genet. 2007 Oct;23(10):480-4
pubmed: 17822800
Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Aug 23;13(8):937
pubmed: 28835372
Bioinformatics. 2012 Apr 15;28(8):1168-9
pubmed: 22345620
Genome Res. 2006 May;16(5):606-17
pubmed: 16606698
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Apr 7;45(6):3253-3265
pubmed: 28175342
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 15;25(12):1552-3
pubmed: 19389737
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180095
pubmed: 28662111
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 15;116(42):21076-21084
pubmed: 31570613
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):1859-75
pubmed: 15728110
PLoS Genet. 2020 Feb 3;16(2):e1008593
pubmed: 32012153
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D260-D266
pubmed: 29140473
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
J Mol Biol. 2006 Jun 9;359(3):825-31
pubmed: 16631793
Genome Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):62-6
pubmed: 14707170
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Oct;74(10):2260-2264
pubmed: 29222921
Trends Genet. 2004 Mar;20(3):113-6
pubmed: 15049300
Plant J. 2014 Jun;78(5):865-76
pubmed: 24654891
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Sep 19;66(37):9850-9857
pubmed: 30142979

Auteurs

Darci A Giacomini (DA)

Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Eric L Patterson (EL)

Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University.

Anita Küpper (A)

Bayer AG, Division of Crop Science, Frankfurt, Germany.

Roland Beffa (R)

Bayer AG, Division of Crop Science, Frankfurt, Germany.

Todd A Gaines (TA)

Department of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University.

Patrick J Tranel (PJ)

Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Articles similaires

Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Aldehydes Biotransformation Flavoring Agents Lipoxygenase
Citrus Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase Stress, Physiological Multigene Family Phylogeny
Arabidopsis Amorphophallus Plants, Genetically Modified Phylogeny Droughts

Classifications MeSH