Neoantigen prediction in human breast cancer using RNA sequencing data.
RNA-seq
breast neoplasms
neoantigen
sequence analysis
whole-exome sequencing
Journal
Cancer science
ISSN: 1349-7006
Titre abrégé: Cancer Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168776
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
04
08
2020
revised:
08
10
2020
accepted:
02
11
2020
pubmed:
7
11
2020
medline:
2
3
2021
entrez:
6
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neoantigens have attracted attention as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. However, accurate prediction of neoantigens is still challenging, especially in terms of its accuracy and cost. Variant detection using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data has been reported to be a low-accuracy but cost-effective tool, but the feasibility of RNA-seq data for neoantigen prediction has not been fully examined. In the present study, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-seq data of tumor and matched normal samples from six breast cancer patients to evaluate the utility of RNA-seq data instead of WES data in variant calling to detect neoantigen candidates. Somatic variants were called in three protocols using: (i) tumor and normal WES data (DNA method, Dm); (ii) tumor and normal RNA-seq data (RNA method, Rm); and (iii) combination of tumor RNA-seq and normal WES data (Combination method, Cm). We found that the Rm had both high false-positive and high false-negative rates because this method depended greatly on the expression status of normal transcripts. When we compared the results of Dm with those of Cm, only 14% of the neoantigen candidates detected in Dm were identified in Cm, but the majority of the missed candidates lacked coverage or variant allele reads in the tumor RNA. In contrast, about 70% of the neoepitope candidates with higher expression and rich mutant transcripts could be detected in Cm. Our results showed that Cm could be an efficient and a cost-effective approach to predict highly expressed neoantigens in tumor samples.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33155341
doi: 10.1111/cas.14720
pmc: PMC7780012
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Neoplasm
0
RNA, Neoplasm
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
465-475Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP18K08564
Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.
Références
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 25;9(1):3919
pubmed: 30254248
Nat Methods. 2013 Feb;10(2):128-32
pubmed: 23291724
Genome Med. 2019 Aug 28;11(1):56
pubmed: 31462330
Cancer Sci. 2017 Feb;108(2):170-177
pubmed: 27960040
Cell Rep. 2015 Oct 13;13(2):267-76
pubmed: 26440895
Gigascience. 2018 Feb 1;7(2):
pubmed: 29267927
Cell Syst. 2015 Sep 23;1(3):210-223
pubmed: 26645048
Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:321-49
pubmed: 20192758
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D109-13
pubmed: 24163250
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Science. 2018 Mar 23;359(6382):1355-1360
pubmed: 29567706
Immunogenetics. 2009 Jan;61(1):1-13
pubmed: 19002680
Nat Rev Immunol. 2018 Mar;18(3):168-182
pubmed: 29226910
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2189-2199
pubmed: 25409260
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 31;6:e5362
pubmed: 30083469
Nat Methods. 2017 Jul;14(7):687-690
pubmed: 28581496
Nat Med. 2019 May;25(5):767-775
pubmed: 31011208
Cell Rep. 2015 Oct 13;13(2):277-89
pubmed: 26440892
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7738):234-239
pubmed: 30568305
Methods. 2015 Jul 15;83:118-27
pubmed: 25913717
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 22;11(3):e0151664
pubmed: 27002637
Genome Biol. 2016 Jun 06;17(1):122
pubmed: 27268795
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Cancer Cell. 2015 Oct 12;28(4):515-528
pubmed: 26439496
Bioinformatics. 2019 Sep 1;35(17):2966-2973
pubmed: 30649250
Science. 2012 Mar 16;335(6074):1302; author reply 1302
pubmed: 22422964
Nature. 2017 Jul 13;547(7662):217-221
pubmed: 28678778
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):525-7
pubmed: 27043002
Nat Biotechnol. 2017 Sep 11;35(9):815-817
pubmed: 28898209
Nature. 2017 Jul 13;547(7662):222-226
pubmed: 28678784
EMBO J. 2013 Jan 23;32(2):194-203
pubmed: 23258224
Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1152-8
pubmed: 26372948
Cancer Cell. 2018 Aug 13;34(2):211-224.e6
pubmed: 30078747
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jul 1;31(13):2202-4
pubmed: 25701572
Science. 2012 Mar 16;335(6074):1302; author reply 1302
pubmed: 22422963
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D682-D688
pubmed: 31691826
Bioinformatics. 2017 Feb 15;33(4):555-557
pubmed: 27797777
Nat Genet. 2011 May;43(5):491-8
pubmed: 21478889
Int J Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;137(1):116-26
pubmed: 25449106
Cancer Immunol Res. 2020 Mar;8(3):409-420
pubmed: 31907209
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun;9(6):579-81
pubmed: 22484847
Brief Bioinform. 2017 Nov 1;18(6):973-983
pubmed: 27473065
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1009-1021
pubmed: 28694034
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jul 22;12(14):14633-14648
pubmed: 32697765
Genome Res. 2014 May;24(5):743-50
pubmed: 24782321
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0201822
pubmed: 30071094
Genome Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):656-64
pubmed: 11932250
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Dec;36(11):1056-1058
pubmed: 30114007
Hum Mutat. 2017 Jul;38(7):788-797
pubmed: 28419628
Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;29(1):24-6
pubmed: 21221095
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):69-74
pubmed: 25838375
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W34-40
pubmed: 23671333
Genomics. 2016 May;107(5):163-9
pubmed: 27046520
Brief Bioinform. 2013 Jan;14(1):46-55
pubmed: 22707752
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25842
pubmed: 22022455
Genome Res. 2012 Mar;22(3):568-76
pubmed: 22300766
Genome Biol. 2015 Jun 23;16:131
pubmed: 26100517
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612
pubmed: 24113773
Science. 2012 Mar 16;335(6074):1302; author reply 1302
pubmed: 22422962
BMC Genomics. 2018 Apr 19;19(1):270
pubmed: 29673323
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Oct 3;93(4):641-51
pubmed: 24075185
Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Sep;37(16):e106
pubmed: 19528076