Cytogenetics and Molecular Investigations detect a Mosaic Variant of Turner Syndrome only Suspected by Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Two Case Reports with Negative Ultrasound Examinations.
Counselling
Turner syndrome
mosaicism
non-invasive prenatal test
prenatal diagnosis
Journal
Journal of medicine and life
ISSN: 1844-3117
Titre abrégé: J Med Life
Pays: Romania
ID NLM: 101477617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
18
1
2021
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
29
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prenatal testing has been moving towards non-invasive methods to determine fetal risk for genetic disorders. Numerous studies have focused the attention on common trisomies; although the detection rate (DR) for trisomy 21 is high (over 95%), the accuracy regarding the DR for trisomies 13 and 18 has come under scrutiny. The testing has been applied to sex chromosome aneuploidies, but many studies have shown that it is not as effective as it is for common trisomies. Although non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) has become a standard screening procedure for all pregnant women, invasive sampling procedures remain important in confirming NIPT-positive findings. In the present study, we report discordant results of Turner syndrome (TS) mosaicism between NIPT and karyotyping. A 35-year-old pregnant woman underwent NIPT, and a probable risk for Xp deletion was indicated. Subsequently, amniocentesis was performed. The karyotype was identified as mos 45,X [28]/46,X,i(X)(q1.0)[5]. In the second case, a 33-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis after a positive NIPT that indicated a probable risk for monosomy X. The result was mos 45,X [8]/46,XY[8]. Since NIPT is a screening test, the possibility of false-positive or false-negative results should always be considered. We underline the importance of pre/post detailed counseling. Furthermore, women with abnormal NIPT results should undergo immediate amniocentesis that remains the only tool for a correct diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33456614
doi: 10.25122/jml-2020-0092
pii: JMedLife-13-624
pmc: PMC7803325
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
624-628Informations de copyright
©Carol Davila University Press.
Références
Hum Mol Genet. 1992 Jul;1(4):221-7
pubmed: 1303191
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016 Oct 1;114(5):e362-5
pubmed: 27606664
Nat Genet. 1998 May;19(1):70-3
pubmed: 9590293
Curr Genomics. 2018 Apr;19(3):240-246
pubmed: 29606911
J Mol Diagn. 2019 Jul;21(4):572-579
pubmed: 31028936
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):1-5
pubmed: 24984969
Horm Res Paediatr. 2011 Feb;75(2):81-9
pubmed: 21325865
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Dec;84(12):4613-21
pubmed: 10599728
Prenat Diagn. 1994 Dec;14(13):1229-42
pubmed: 7617569
Blood. 1991 Jun 1;77(11):2360-3
pubmed: 2039818
J Korean Med Sci. 2012 Oct;27(10):1273-7
pubmed: 23091330
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;42(1):15-33
pubmed: 23765643
J Med Genet. 1996 Jul;33(7):529-33
pubmed: 8818935
J Clin Med. 2014 May 21;3(2):537-65
pubmed: 26237390
Nat Genet. 1997 May;16(1):54-63
pubmed: 9140395
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195905
pubmed: 29649318
Clin Epigenetics. 2018 Apr 6;10:45
pubmed: 29636833
J Med Life. 2019 Jul-Sep;12(3):221-224
pubmed: 31666820
Aust Fam Physician. 2017 Oct;46(10):735-739
pubmed: 29036772
Nature. 2005 Mar 17;434(7031):400-4
pubmed: 15772666
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec;86(24):10001-5
pubmed: 2602357
Birth Defects Res. 2020 Mar 1;112(4):339-349
pubmed: 31566914