Chromothripsis followed by circular recombination drives oncogene amplification in human cancer.
Journal
Nature genetics
ISSN: 1546-1718
Titre abrégé: Nat Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9216904
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
07
05
2020
accepted:
10
09
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
medline:
29
12
2021
entrez:
16
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The mechanisms behind the evolution of complex genomic amplifications in cancer have remained largely unclear. Using whole-genome sequencing data of the pediatric tumor neuroblastoma, we here identified a type of amplification, termed 'seismic amplification', that is characterized by multiple rearrangements and discontinuous copy number levels. Overall, seismic amplifications occurred in 9.9% (274 of 2,756) of cases across 38 cancer types, and were associated with massively increased copy numbers and elevated oncogene expression. Reconstruction of the development of seismic amplification showed a stepwise evolution, starting with a chromothripsis event, followed by formation of circular extrachromosomal DNA that subsequently underwent repetitive rounds of circular recombination. The resulting amplicons persisted as extrachromosomal DNA circles or had reintegrated into the genome in overt tumors. Together, our data indicate that the sequential occurrence of chromothripsis and circular recombination drives oncogene amplification and overexpression in a substantial fraction of human malignancies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34782764
doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00951-7
pii: 10.1038/s41588-021-00951-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Circular
0
DNA, Neoplasm
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1673-1685Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Références
Storlazzi, C. T. et al. Gene amplification as double minutes or homogeneously staining regions in solid tumors: origin and structure. Genome Res 20, 1198–1206 (2010).
pubmed: 20631050
pmcid: 2928498
doi: 10.1101/gr.106252.110
Biedler, J. L. & Spengler, B. A. Metaphase chromosome anomaly: association with drug resistance and cell-specific products. Science 191, 185–187 (1976).
pubmed: 942798
doi: 10.1126/science.942798
Fan, Y. et al. Frequency of double minute chromosomes and combined cytogenetic abnormalities and their characteristics. J. Appl. Genet. 52, 53–59 (2011).
pubmed: 21107781
doi: 10.1007/s13353-010-0007-z
Koche, R. P. et al. Extrachromosomal circular DNA drives oncogenic genome remodeling in neuroblastoma. Nat. Genet. 52, 29–34 (2020).
pubmed: 31844324
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0547-z
L’Abbate, A. et al. Genomic organization and evolution of double minutes/homogeneously staining regions with MYC amplification in human cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 9131–9145 (2014).
pubmed: 25034695
pmcid: 4132716
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku590
Turner, K. M. et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature 543, 122–125 (2017).
pubmed: 28178237
pmcid: 5334176
doi: 10.1038/nature21356
Maris, J. M., Hogarty, M. D., Bagatell, R. & Cohn, S. L. Neuroblastoma. Lancet 369, 2106–2120 (2007).
pubmed: 17586306
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60983-0
Moreau, L. A. et al. Does MYCN amplification manifested as homogeneously staining regions at diagnosis predict a worse outcome in children with neuroblastoma? A Children’s Oncology Group study. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 5693–5697 (2006).
pubmed: 17020972
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1500
Garsed, D. W. et al. The architecture and evolution of cancer neochromosomes. Cancer Cell 26, 653–667 (2014).
pubmed: 25517748
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.010
Li, Y. et al. Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes. Nature 578, 112–121 (2020).
pubmed: 32025012
pmcid: 7025897
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1913-9
Stephens, P. J. et al. Complex landscapes of somatic rearrangement in human breast cancer genomes. Nature 462, 1005–1010 (2009).
pubmed: 20033038
pmcid: 3398135
doi: 10.1038/nature08645
Selvarajah, S. et al. The breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle as a mechanism for generating genetic heterogeneity in osteosarcoma. Chromosoma 115, 459–467 (2006).
pubmed: 16897100
doi: 10.1007/s00412-006-0074-4
Verhaak, R. G. W., Bafna, V. & Mischel, P. S. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification in tumour pathogenesis and evolution. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 283–288 (2019).
pubmed: 30872802
pmcid: 7168519
doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0128-6
Korbel, J. O. & Campbell, P. J. Criteria for inference of chromothripsis in cancer genomes. Cell 152, 1226–1236 (2013).
pubmed: 23498933
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.023
Stephens, P. J. et al. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell 144, 27–40 (2011).
pubmed: 21215367
pmcid: 3065307
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055
Ly, P. et al. Chromosome segregation errors generate a diverse spectrum of simple and complex genomic rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 51, 705–715 (2019).
pubmed: 30833795
pmcid: 6441390
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0360-8
Otto, T. & Sicinski, P. Cell cycle proteins as promising targets in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17, 93–115 (2017).
pubmed: 28127048
pmcid: 5345933
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.138
Vogelstein, B. & Kinzler, K. W. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat. Med. 10, 789–799 (2004).
pubmed: 15286780
doi: 10.1038/nm1087
ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 578, 82–93 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6
Santarius, T., Shipley, J., Brewer, D., Stratton, M. R. & Cooper, C. S. A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 59–64 (2010).
pubmed: 20029424
doi: 10.1038/nrc2771
Li, Y. et al. Constitutional and somatic rearrangement of chromosome 21 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature 508, 98–102 (2014).
pubmed: 24670643
pmcid: 3976272
doi: 10.1038/nature13115
Matsui, A., Ihara, T., Suda, H., Mikami, H. & Semba, K. Gene amplification: mechanisms and involvement in cancer. Biomol. Concepts 4, 567–582 (2013).
pubmed: 25436757
doi: 10.1515/bmc-2013-0026
L′Abbate, A. et al. MYC-containing amplicons in acute myeloid leukemia: genomic structures, evolution, and transcriptional consequences. Leukemia 32, 2152–2166 (2018).
pmcid: 6170393
doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0033-0
Cortés-Ciriano, I. et al. Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing. Nat. Genet. 52, 331–341 (2020).
pubmed: 32025003
pmcid: 7058534
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0576-7
Shoshani, O. et al. Chromothripsis drives the evolution of gene amplification in cancer. Nature 591, 137–141 (2021).
pubmed: 33361815
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03064-z
Shimizu, N., Shingaki, K., Kaneko-Sasaguri, Y., Hashizume, T. & Kanda, T. When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation. Exp. Cell. Res. 302, 233–243 (2005).
pubmed: 15561104
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.09.001
Zakov, S., Kinsella, M. & Bafna, V. An algorithmic approach for breakage-fusion-bridge detection in tumor genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 5546–5551 (2013).
pubmed: 23503850
pmcid: 3619374
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220977110
Kim, H. et al. Extrachromosomal DNA is associated with oncogene amplification and poor outcome across multiple cancers. Nat. Genet. 52, 891–897 (2020).
pubmed: 32807987
pmcid: 7484012
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0678-2
Garsed, D. W., Holloway, A. J. & Thomas, D. M. Cancer-associated neochromosomes: a novel mechanism of oncogenesis. Bioessays 31, 1191–1200 (2009).
pubmed: 19795405
doi: 10.1002/bies.200800208
Vasmatzis, G. et al. Chromoanasynthesis is a common mechanism that leads to ERBB2 amplifications in a cohort of early stage HER2(+) breast cancer samples. BMC Cancer 18, 738 (2018).
pubmed: 30005627
pmcid: 6045826
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4594-0
Gibaud, A. et al. Extrachromosomal amplification mechanisms in a glioma with amplified sequences from multiple chromosome loci. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19, 1276–1285 (2010).
pubmed: 20056677
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq004
Campbell, P. J. et al. Identification of somatically acquired rearrangements in cancer using genome-wide massively parallel paired-end sequencing. Nat. Genet. 40, 722–729 (2008).
pubmed: 18438408
pmcid: 2705838
doi: 10.1038/ng.128
Barra, V. & Fachinetti, D. The dark side of centromeres: types, causes and consequences of structural abnormalities implicating centromeric DNA. Nat. Commun. 9, 4340 (2018).
pubmed: 30337534
pmcid: 6194107
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06545-y
Benner, S. E., Wahl, G. M. & Von Hoff, D. D. Double minute chromosomes and homogeneously staining regions in tumors taken directly from patients versus in human tumor cell lines. Anticancer Drugs 2, 11–25 (1991).
pubmed: 1720337
doi: 10.1097/00001813-199102000-00002
Beird, H. C. et al. Genomic profiling of dedifferentiated liposarcoma compared to matched well-differentiated liposarcoma reveals higher genomic complexity and a common origin. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 4, a002386 (2018).
pubmed: 29610390
pmcid: 5880260
doi: 10.1101/mcs.a002386
Pedeutour, F. et al. Structure of the supernumerary ring and giant rod chromosomes in adipose tissue tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 24, 30–41 (1999).
pubmed: 9892106
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199901)24:1<30::AID-GCC5>3.0.CO;2-P
Macintyre, G. et al. Copy number signatures and mutational processes in ovarian carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 50, 1262–1270 (2018).
pubmed: 30104763
pmcid: 6130818
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0179-8
Hellinger, E. Neue Begründung der Theorie quadratischer Formen von unendlichvielen Veränderlichen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 136, 210–271 (1909).
doi: 10.1515/crll.1909.136.210
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer. Nature 578, 94–101 (2020).
pubmed: 32025018
pmcid: 7054213
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1943-3
Alexandrov, L. B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415–421 (2013).
pubmed: 23945592
pmcid: 3776390
doi: 10.1038/nature12477
Swanton, C., McGranahan, N., Starrett, G. J. & Harris, R. S. APOBEC enzymes: mutagenic fuel for cancer evolution and heterogeneity. Cancer Discov. 5, 704–712 (2015).
pubmed: 26091828
pmcid: 4497973
doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0344
Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers. Cell 149, 979–993 (2012).
pubmed: 22608084
pmcid: 3414841
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.024
Roberts, S. A. et al. An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers. Nat. Genet. 45, 970–976 (2013).
pubmed: 23852170
pmcid: 3789062
doi: 10.1038/ng.2702
Maciejowski, J., Li, Y., Bosco, N., Campbell, P. J. & de Lange, T. Chromothripsis and kataegis induced by telomere crisis. Cell 163, 1641–1654 (2015).
pubmed: 26687355
pmcid: 4687025
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.054
Chan, K. & Gordenin, D. A. Clusters of multiple mutations: incidence and molecular mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 49, 243–267 (2015).
pubmed: 26631512
pmcid: 4710516
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-054714
Elango, R. et al. Repair of base damage within break-induced replication intermediates promotes kataegis associated with chromosome rearrangements. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 9666–9684 (2019).
pubmed: 31392335
pmcid: 6765108
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz651
Pfeiffer, P., Goedecke, W. & Obe, G. Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair and their potential to induce chromosomal aberrations. Mutagenesis 15, 289–302 (2000).
pubmed: 10887207
doi: 10.1093/mutage/15.4.289
Hicks, J. et al. Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. Genome Res. 16, 1465–1479 (2006).
pubmed: 17142309
pmcid: 1665631
doi: 10.1101/gr.5460106
Hadi, K. et al. Distinct classes of complex structural variation uncovered across thousands of cancer genome graphs. Cell 183, 197–210 e132 (2020).
pubmed: 33007263
pmcid: 7912537
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.006
Helmsauer, K. et al. Enhancer hijacking determines extrachromosomal circular MYCN amplicon architecture in neuroblastoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 5823 (2020).
pubmed: 33199677
pmcid: 7669906
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19452-y
Wu, S. et al. Circular ecDNA promotes accessible chromatin and high oncogene expression. Nature 575, 699–703 (2019).
pubmed: 31748743
pmcid: 7094777
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1763-5
Rausch, T. et al. Genome sequencing of pediatric medulloblastoma links catastrophic DNA rearrangements with TP53 mutations. Cell 148, 59–71 (2012).
pubmed: 22265402
pmcid: 3332216
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.013
Zhang, C. Z. et al. Chromothripsis from DNA damage in micronuclei. Nature 522, 179–184 (2015).
pubmed: 26017310
pmcid: 4742237
doi: 10.1038/nature14493
Bailey, C., Shoura, M. J., Mischel, P. S. & Swanton, C. Extrachromosomal DNA-relieving heredity constraints, accelerating tumour evolution. Ann. Oncol. 31, 884–893 (2020).
pubmed: 32275948
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.303
Beverley, S. M., Coderre, J. A., Santi, D. V. & Schimke, R. T. Unstable DNA amplifications in methotrexate-resistant Leishmania consist of extrachromosomal circles which relocalize during stabilization. Cell 38, 431–439 (1984).
pubmed: 6467372
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90498-7
Schimke, R. T. Gene amplification in cultured animal cells. Cell 37, 705–713 (1984).
pubmed: 6378386
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90406-9
Bignell, G. R. et al. Architectures of somatic genomic rearrangement in human cancer amplicons at sequence-level resolution. Genome Res. 17, 1296–1303 (2007).
pubmed: 17675364
pmcid: 1950898
doi: 10.1101/gr.6522707
Corvi, R., Savelyeva, L., Amler, L., Handgretinger, R. & Schwab, M. Cytogenetic evolution of MYCN and MDM2 amplification in the neuroblastoma LS tumour and its cell line. Eur. J. Cancer 31A, 520–523 (1995).
pubmed: 7576957
doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00031-D
Peifer, M. et al. Telomerase activation by genomic rearrangements in high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature 526, 700–704 (2015).
pubmed: 26466568
pmcid: 4881306
doi: 10.1038/nature14980
Cun, Y., Yang, T. P., Achter, V., Lang, U. & Peifer, M. Copy-number analysis and inference of subclonal populations in cancer genomes using Sclust. Nat. Protoc. 13, 1488–1501 (2018).
pubmed: 29844525
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2018.033
Fang, L. et al. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data. Nat. Commun. 10, 5585 (2019).
pubmed: 31811119
pmcid: 6898185
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13397-7
Dentro, S. C. et al. Characterizing genetic intra-tumor heterogeneity across 2,658 human cancer genomes. Cell 184, 2239–2254 e2239 (2021).
pubmed: 33831375
pmcid: 8054914
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.009
CNV Overview (Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer, accessed 20 March, 2020) https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/help/cnv/overview