Diagnostic testing approaches for the identification of patients with TRK fusion cancer prior to enrollment in clinical trials investigating larotrectinib.
Adult
Child
Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
Female
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Male
Membrane Glycoproteins
/ genetics
Microarray Analysis
Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion
/ genetics
Patient Selection
Precision Medicine
Pyrazoles
/ therapeutic use
Pyrimidines
/ therapeutic use
Receptor, trkA
/ genetics
Receptor, trkB
/ genetics
Receptor, trkC
/ genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Sequence Analysis, RNA
Gene fusion
Larotrectinib
Molecular diagnostic
NTRK
Next-generation sequencing
Journal
Cancer genetics
ISSN: 2210-7762
Titre abrégé: Cancer Genet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101539150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
11
08
2021
revised:
13
10
2021
accepted:
28
11
2021
pubmed:
21
12
2021
medline:
17
2
2022
entrez:
20
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
NTRK gene fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers independent of tumor type. Prevalence varies from highly recurrent in certain rare tumors to <1% in common cancers. The selective TRK inhibitor larotrectinib was shown to be highly active in adult and pediatric patients with tumors harboring NTRK gene fusions. We examined the techniques used by local sites to detect tumor NTRK gene fusions in patients enrolled in clinical trials of larotrectinib. We also report the characteristics of the detected fusions in different tumor types. The analysis included 225 patients with 19 different tumor types. Testing methods used were next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 196 of 225 tumors (87%); this was RNA-based in 96 (43%); DNA-based in 53 (24%); DNA/RNA-based in 46 (20%) and unknown in 1 (<1%); FISH in 14 (6%) and PCR-based in 12 (5%). NanoString, Sanger sequencing and chromosome microarray were each utilized once (<1%). Fifty-four different fusion partners were identified, 39 (72%) of which were unique occurrences. The most common local testing approach was RNA-based NGS. Many different NTRK gene fusions were identified with most occurring at low frequency. This supports the need for validated and appropriate testing methodologies that work agnostic of fusion partners.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34929613
pii: S2210-7762(21)00232-5
doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2021.11.006
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Membrane Glycoproteins
0
NTRK1 protein, human
0
NTRK3 protein, human
0
Oncogene Proteins, Fusion
0
Pyrazoles
0
Pyrimidines
0
Receptor, trkA
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, trkB
EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, trkC
EC 2.7.10.1
tropomyosin-related kinase-B, human
EC 2.7.10.1
larotrectinib
PF9462I9HX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
46-52Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest E.R.R. reports institutional reimbursement from Bayer for time on advisory boards and as part of clinical trials. J.H. is a full-time employee of Neogenomics, and reports research funding and advisory board fees from Bayer and honoraria from WebMD. M.R., J.S., J.W., K.S. and H.N. are employees of Bayer and R.N. works for an organization that carries out contract research for Bayer. C.M.L. reports that her spouse is employed by Bayer. D.S.H. reports institutional research/grant funding from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Aldi-Norte, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Erasca, Fate Therapeutics, Genentech, Genmab, Infinity, Kite, Kyowa, Lilly, LOXO, Merck, Medimmune, Mirati, Mologen, Navier, NCI-CTEP, Novartis, Numab, Pfizer, Pyramid Bio, SeaGen, Takeda, Turning Point Therapeutics, Verstatem, and VM Oncology; travel, accommodation, expenses from: Bayer, Genmab, AACR, ASCO, SITC and Telperian; consulting, speaker or advisory roles with: Adaptimmune, Alpha Insights, Acuta, Alkermes, Amgen, Aumbiosciences, Atheneum, Axiom, Barclays, Baxter, Bayer, Boxer Capital, BridgeBio, CDR-life AG, COR2ed, COG, Ecor1, Genentech, Gilead, GLG, Group H, Guidepoint, HCW Precision, Immunogen, Infinity, Janssen, Liberium, Medscape, Numab, Oncologia Brasil, Pfizer, Pharma Intelligence, POET Congress, Prime Oncology, Seattle Genetics, ST Cube, Takeda, Tavistock, Trieza Therapeutics, Turning Point, WebMD, and Ziopharm; and other ownership interests in relation to: OncoResponse (founder) and Telperian Inc (advisor). A.D. reports honoraria/advisory board roles with: Ignyta/Genentech/Roche, Loxo/Bayer/Lilly, Takeda/Ariad/Millenium, TP Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Blueprint Medicines, Helsinn, Beigene, BergenBio, Hengrui Therapeutics, Exelixis, Tyra Biosciences, Verastem, MORE Health, Abbvie, 14ner/Elevation Oncology, Remedica Ltd., ArcherDX, Monopteros, Novartis, EMD Serono, Melendi, Liberum, Repare RX, Nuvalent, Merus, AXIS, Chugai Pharm, and EPG Health; associated research paid to institution from Pfizer, Exelixis, GlaxoSmithKlein, Teva, Taiho, and PharmaMar; royalties from Wolters Kluwer; other from Merck, Puma, Merus, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and CME honoraria from Medscape, OncLive, PeerVoice, Physicians Education Resources, Targeted Oncology, Research to Practice, Axis, Peerview Institute, Paradigm Medical Communications, WebMD, MJH Life Sciences, Med Learning, Imedex, Answers in CME, and Clinical Care Options. T.W.L. reports consulting roles with Bayer, Cellectis, Novartis, Deciphera, Jumo Health, Y-mAbs Therapeutics and research support from: Bayer, Pfizer and Novartis. S.R.-C. declares that he has no competing interests.