A pan-grass transcriptome reveals patterns of cellular divergence in crops.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
received:
08
06
2022
accepted:
05
04
2023
medline:
26
5
2023
pubmed:
11
5
2023
entrez:
10
5
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Different plant species within the grasses were parallel targets of domestication, giving rise to crops with distinct evolutionary histories and traits
Identifiants
pubmed: 37165193
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06053-0
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-06053-0
pmc: PMC10657638
mid: NIHMS1932391
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
785-791Subventions
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R01 LM012736
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH113005
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM136362
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Woodhouse, M. R. & Hufford, M. B. Parallelism and convergence in post-domestication adaptation in cereal grasses. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180245 (2019).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0245
Rich-Griffin, C. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics: a high-resolution avenue for plant functional genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 186–197 (2020).
pubmed: 31780334
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.10.008
Marioni, J. C. & Arendt, D. How single-cell genomics is changing evolutionary and developmental biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 537–553 (2017).
pubmed: 28813177
doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060818
Shafer, M. E. R. Cross-species analysis of single-cell transcriptomic data. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7, 175 (2019).
pubmed: 31552245
pmcid: 6743501
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00175
Kajala, K. et al. Innovation, conservation, and repurposing of gene function in root cell type development. Cell 184, 3333–3348.e19 (2021).
pubmed: 34010619
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.024
Swigonova, Z. et al. On the tetraploid origin of the maize genome. Comp. Funct. Genomics 5, 281–284 (2004).
pubmed: 18629160
pmcid: 2447450
doi: 10.1002/cfg.395
Swigonova, Z. Close split of sorghum and maize genome progenitors. Genome Res. 14, 1916–1923 (2004).
pubmed: 15466289
pmcid: 524415
doi: 10.1101/gr.2332504
Kozlova, L. V., Nazipova, A. R., Gorshkov, O. V., Petrova, A. A. & Gorshkova, T. A. Elongating maize root: zone-specific combinations of polysaccharides from type I and type II primary cell walls. Sci. Rep. 10, 10956 (2020).
pubmed: 32616810
pmcid: 7331734
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67782-0
Ma, W. et al. The mucilage proteome of maize (Zea mays L.) primary roots. J. Proteome Res. 9, 2968–2976 (2010).
pubmed: 20408568
doi: 10.1021/pr901168v
Schittenhelm, S. & Schroetter, S. Comparison of drought tolerance of maize, sweet sorghum and sorghum–sudangrass hybrids. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 200, 46–53 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/jac.12039
Zhang, Y. et al. Differentially regulated orthologs in sorghum and the subgenomes of maize. Plant Cell 29, 1938–1951 (2017).
pubmed: 28733421
pmcid: 5590507
doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00354
Zheng, Z. et al. Shared genetic control of root system architecture between Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. Plant Physiol. 182, 977–991 (2020).
pubmed: 31740504
doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00752
McKain, M. R. et al. Ancestry of the two subgenomes of maize. Preprint at BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/352351 (2018).
Schnable, J. C., Springer, N. M. & Freeling, M. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4069–4074 (2011).
pubmed: 21368132
pmcid: 3053962
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101368108
Bawa, G., Liu, Z., Yu, X., Qin, A. & Sun, X. Single-cell RNA sequencing for plant research: insights and possible benefits. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 4497 (2022).
pubmed: 35562888
pmcid: 9100049
doi: 10.3390/ijms23094497
Farmer, A., Thibivilliers, S., Ryu, K. H., Schiefelbein, J. & Libault, M. Single-nucleus RNA and ATAC sequencing reveals the impact of chromatin accessibility on gene expression in Arabidopsis roots at the single-cell level. Mol. Plant 14, 372–383 (2021).
pubmed: 33422696
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.01.001
Long, Y. et al. FlsnRNA-seq: protoplasting-free full-length single-nucleus RNA profiling in plants. Genome Biol. 22, 66 (2021).
pubmed: 33608047
pmcid: 7893963
doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02288-0
Marand, A. P., Chen, Z., Gallavotti, A. & Schmitz, R. J. A cis-regulatory atlas in maize at single-cell resolution. Cell 184, 3041–3055.e21 (2021).
pubmed: 33964211
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.014
Ortiz-Ramírez, C. et al. Ground tissue circuitry regulates organ complexity in maize and Setaria. Science 374, 1247–1252 (2021).
pubmed: 34855479
pmcid: 8719420
doi: 10.1126/science.abj2327
Ding, J. et al. Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 737–746 (2020).
pubmed: 32341560
pmcid: 7289686
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0465-8
Ray F. Evert. in Esau’s Plant Anatomy, Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: their Structure, Function, and Development 3rd edn 99 (Wiley, 2006).
Sorenson, R. S., Deshotel, M. J., Johnson, K., Adler, F. R. & Sieburth, L. E. Arabidopsis mRNA decay landscape arises from specialized RNA decay substrates, decapping-mediated feedback, and redundancy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1485–E1494 (2018).
pubmed: 29386391
pmcid: 5816150
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712312115
Lotfollahi, M., Wolf, F. A. & Theis, F. J. scGen predicts single-cell perturbation responses. Nat. Methods 16, 715–721 (2019).
pubmed: 31363220
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0494-8
Ferrari, C., Manosalva Pérez, N. & Vandepoele, K. MINI-EX: integrative inference of single-cell gene regulatory networks in plants. Mol. Plant 15, 1807–1824 (2022).
pubmed: 36307979
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.10.016
Donner, T. J., Sherr, I. & Scarpella, E. Regulation of preprocambial cell state acquisition by auxin signaling in Arabidopsis leaves. Development 136, 3235–3246 (2009).
pubmed: 19710171
doi: 10.1242/dev.037028
Wang, S. et al. RppM, encoding a typical CC-NBS-LRR protein, confers resistance to southern corn rust in maize. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 951318 (2022).
pubmed: 35903220
pmcid: 9317930
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.951318
Ingram, G. C., Magnard, J. L., Vergne, P., Dumas, C. & Rogowsky, P. M. ZmOCL1, an HDGL2 family homeobox gene, is expressed in the outer cell layer throughout maize development. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 343–354 (1999).
pubmed: 10412912
doi: 10.1023/A:1006271332400
Li, Z., Tang, J., Srivastava, R., Bassham, D. C. & Howell, S. H. The transcription factor bZIP60 links the unfolded protein response to the heat stress response in maize. Plant Cell 32, 3559–3575 (2020).
pubmed: 32843434
pmcid: 7610289
doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00260
Guo, Z. et al. MRG1/2 histone methylation readers and HD2C histone deacetylase associate in repression of the florigen gene FT to set a proper flowering time in response to day-length changes. New Phytol. 227, 1453–1466 (2020).
pubmed: 32315442
doi: 10.1111/nph.16616
Grover, C. E. et al. Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploids. New Phytol. 196, 966–971 (2012).
pubmed: 23033870
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04365.x
Lynch, M. & Force, A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459–473 (2000).
pubmed: 10629003
pmcid: 1460895
doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.1.459
Chaudhary, B. et al. Reciprocal silencing, transcriptional bias and functional divergence of homeologs in polyploid cotton (Gossypium). Genetics 182, 503–517 (2009).
pubmed: 19363125
pmcid: 2691759
doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.102608
Hughes, T. E., Langdale, J. A. & Kelly, S. The impact of widespread regulatory neofunctionalization on homeolog gene evolution following whole-genome duplication in maize. Genome Res. 24, 1348–1355 (2014).
pubmed: 24788921
pmcid: 4120087
doi: 10.1101/gr.172684.114
Zhao, M., Zhang, B., Lisch, D. & Ma, J. Patterns and consequences of subgenome differentiation provide insights into the nature of paleopolyploidy in plants. Plant Cell 29, 2974–2994 (2017).
pubmed: 29180596
pmcid: 5757279
doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00595
Li, L. et al. Co-expression network analysis of duplicate genes in maize (Zea mays L.) reveals no subgenome bias. BMC Genomics 17, 1–16 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3194-0
Birchler, J. A. & Veitia, R. A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14746–14753 (2012).
pubmed: 22908297
pmcid: 3443177
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207726109
Muyle, A., Marais, G. A. B., Bačovský, V., Hobza, R. & Lenormand, T. Dosage compensation evolution in plants: theories, controversies and mechanisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 377, 20210222 (2022).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0222
Walsh, J. R., Woodhouse, M. R., Andorf, C. M. & Sen, T. Z. Tissue-specific gene expression and protein abundance patterns are associated with fractionation bias in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 4 (2020).
pubmed: 31900107
pmcid: 6942271
doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2218-8
Renny-Byfield, S., Rodgers-Melnick, E. & Ross-Ibarra, J. Gene fractionation and function in the ancient subgenomes of maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1825–1832 (2017).
pubmed: 28430989
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx121
Xu, X. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of developing maize ears facilitates functional analysis and trait candidate gene discovery. Dev. Cell 56, 557–568.e6 (2021).
pubmed: 33400914
pmcid: 7904613
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.12.015
Rastogi, S. & Liberles, D. A. Subfunctionalization of duplicated genes as a transition state to neofunctionalization. BMC Evol. Biol. 5, 28 (2005).
pubmed: 15831095
pmcid: 1112588
doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-5-28
Lee, J., Shah, M., Ballouz, S., Crow, M. & Gillis, J. CoCoCoNet: conserved and comparative co-expression across a diverse set of species. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W566–W571 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa348
Van Deynze, A. et al. Nitrogen fixation in a landrace of maize is supported by a mucilage-associated diazotrophic microbiota. PLoS Biol. 16, e2006352 (2018).
pubmed: 30086128
pmcid: 6080747
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352
Galloway, A. F., Knox, P. & Krause, K. Sticky mucilages and exudates of plants: putative microenvironmental design elements with biotechnological value. New Phytol. 225, 1461–1469 (2020).
pubmed: 31454421
doi: 10.1111/nph.16144
Werker, E. & Kislev, M. Mucilage on the root surface and root Hairs of sorghum: Heterogeneity in structure, manner of production and site of accumulation. Ann. Bot. 42, 809–816 (1978).
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085520
Voiniciuc, C., Guenl, M., Schmidt, M. H.-W. & Usadel, B. Highly branched xylan made by IRX14 and MUCI21 links mucilage to Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 169, 2481–2495 (2015).
pubmed: 26482889
pmcid: 4677919
Wang, B. et al. Genome-wide selection and genetic improvement during modern maize breeding. Nat. Genet. 52, 565–571 (2020).
pubmed: 32341525
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0616-3
Arendt, D. The evolution of cell types in animals: emerging principles from molecular studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 868–882 (2008).
pubmed: 18927580
doi: 10.1038/nrg2416
Wang, X. et al. Genome alignment spanning major poaceae lineages reveals heterogeneous evolutionary rates and alters inferred dates for key evolutionary events. Mol. Plant 8, 885–898 (2015).
pubmed: 25896453
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.004
Efroni, I., Ip, P.-L., Nawy, T., Mello, A. & Birnbaum, K. D. Quantification of cell identity from single-cell gene expression profiles. Genome Biol. 16, 9 (2015).
pubmed: 25608970
pmcid: 4354993
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0580-x
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 e21 (2019).
pubmed: 31178118
pmcid: 6687398
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031
Hafemeister, C. & Satija, R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 20, 296 (2019).
pubmed: 31870423
pmcid: 6927181
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1
Raju, S. K. K., Ledford, S. M. & Niederhuth, C. E. DNA methylation signatures of duplicate gene evolution in angiosperms. Plant Physiol. kiad220 (2023).
Hernández-Coronado, M. et al. Plant glutamate receptors mediate a bet-hedging strategy between regeneration and defense. Dev. Cell 57, 451–465.e6 (2022).
pubmed: 35148835
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.01.013
Yanai, I. et al. Genome-wide midrange transcription profiles reveal expression level relationships in human tissue specification. Bioinformatics 21, 650–659 (2005).
pubmed: 15388519
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti042
Crow, M., Paul, A., Ballouz, S., Huang, Z. J. & Gillis, J. Characterizing the replicability of cell types defined by single cell RNA-sequencing data using MetaNeighbor. Nat. Commun. 9, 884 (2018).
pubmed: 29491377
pmcid: 5830442
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03282-0
Fischer, S., Crow, M., Harris, B. D. & Gillis, J. Scaling up reproducible research for single-cell transcriptomics using MetaNeighbor. Nat. Protoc. 16, 4031–4067 (2021).
pubmed: 34234317
pmcid: 8826496
doi: 10.1038/s41596-021-00575-5
Hanley, J. A. & McNeil, B. J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148, 839–843 (1983).
pubmed: 6878708
doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 19, 15 (2018).
pubmed: 29409532
pmcid: 5802054
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0
Crow, M., Suresh, H., Lee, J. & Gillis, J. Coexpression reveals conserved gene programs that co-vary with cell type across kingdoms. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 4302–4314 (2022).
pubmed: 35451481
pmcid: 9071420
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac276
Huang, T., Guillotin, B., Rahni, R., Birnbaum, K. & Wagner, D. A rapid and sensitive multiplex, whole mount RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry protocol. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.09.531900 (2023).
Jackson, D., Veit, B. & Hake, S. Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120, 405–413 (1994).
doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.405