Solanum aculeatissimum and Solanum torvum chloroplast genome sequences: a comparative analysis with other Solanum chloroplast genomes.
Solanum aculeatissimum
Solanum torvum
Chloroplast genome
Phylogenetic analysis
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
30
09
2023
accepted:
05
03
2024
medline:
27
4
2024
pubmed:
27
4
2024
entrez:
26
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Solanum aculeatissimum and Solanum torvum belong to the Solanum species, and they are essential plants known for their high resistance to diseases and adverse conditions. They are frequently used as rootstocks for grafting and are often crossbred with other Solanum species to leverage their resistance traits. However, the phylogenetic relationship between S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum within the Solanum genus remains unclear. Therefore, this paper aims to sequence the complete chloroplast genomes of S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum and analyze them in comparison with 29 other previously published chloroplast genomes of Solanum species. We observed that the chloroplast genomes of S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum possess typical tetrameric structures, consisting of one Large Single Copy (LSC) region, two reverse-symmetric Inverted Repeats (IRs), and one Small Single Copy (SSC) region. The total length of these chloroplast genomes ranged from 154,942 to 156,004 bp, with minimal variation. The highest GC content was found in the IR region, while the lowest was in the SSC region. Regarding gene content, the total number of chloroplast genes and CDS genes remained relatively consistent, ranging from 128 to 134 and 83 to 91, respectively. Nevertheless, there was notable variability in the number of tRNA genes and rRNAs. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis revealed that both S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum preferred codons that utilized A and U bases. Analysis of the IR boundary regions indicated that contraction and expansion primarily occurred at the junction between SSC and IR regions. Nucleotide polymorphism analysis and structural variation analysis demonstrated that chloroplast variation in Solanum species mainly occurred in the LSC and SSC regions. Repeat sequence analysis revealed that A/T was the most frequent base pair in simple repeat sequences (SSR), while Palindromic and Forward repeats were more common in long sequence repeats (LSR), with Reverse and Complement repeats being less frequent. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum belonged to the same meristem and were more closely related to Cultivated Eggplant. These findings enhance our comprehension of chloroplast genomes within the Solanum genus, offering valuable insights for plant classification, evolutionary studies, and potential molecular markers for species identification.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Solanum aculeatissimum and Solanum torvum belong to the Solanum species, and they are essential plants known for their high resistance to diseases and adverse conditions. They are frequently used as rootstocks for grafting and are often crossbred with other Solanum species to leverage their resistance traits. However, the phylogenetic relationship between S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum within the Solanum genus remains unclear. Therefore, this paper aims to sequence the complete chloroplast genomes of S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum and analyze them in comparison with 29 other previously published chloroplast genomes of Solanum species.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We observed that the chloroplast genomes of S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum possess typical tetrameric structures, consisting of one Large Single Copy (LSC) region, two reverse-symmetric Inverted Repeats (IRs), and one Small Single Copy (SSC) region. The total length of these chloroplast genomes ranged from 154,942 to 156,004 bp, with minimal variation. The highest GC content was found in the IR region, while the lowest was in the SSC region. Regarding gene content, the total number of chloroplast genes and CDS genes remained relatively consistent, ranging from 128 to 134 and 83 to 91, respectively. Nevertheless, there was notable variability in the number of tRNA genes and rRNAs. Relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis revealed that both S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum preferred codons that utilized A and U bases. Analysis of the IR boundary regions indicated that contraction and expansion primarily occurred at the junction between SSC and IR regions. Nucleotide polymorphism analysis and structural variation analysis demonstrated that chloroplast variation in Solanum species mainly occurred in the LSC and SSC regions. Repeat sequence analysis revealed that A/T was the most frequent base pair in simple repeat sequences (SSR), while Palindromic and Forward repeats were more common in long sequence repeats (LSR), with Reverse and Complement repeats being less frequent. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that S. aculeatissimum and S. torvum belonged to the same meristem and were more closely related to Cultivated Eggplant.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
These findings enhance our comprehension of chloroplast genomes within the Solanum genus, offering valuable insights for plant classification, evolutionary studies, and potential molecular markers for species identification.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38671394
doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10190-9
pii: 10.1186/s12864-024-10190-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
412Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Vorontsova MS, Stern S, Bohs L et al. African spiny Solanum (Subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle[J]. Bot J Linn Soc, 2013(2).
Riccardo R, Allen VD, Ezio P, et al. New insights on Eggplant/Tomato/Pepper Synteny and Identification of Eggplant and Pepper Orthologous QTL[J]. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1031.
Knapp S, Vorontsova MS, Prohens J..Wild relatives of the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.: Solanaceae): New understanding of species names in a Complex. Group[J] Plos One, 2013; 8.
Taher D, Solberg S, Prohens J et al. World Vegetable Center Eggplant Collection: Origin, Composition, Seed Dissemination and Utilization in Breeding[J].Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017; 8.
Plazas M, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, et al. Interspecific hybridization between Eggplant and Wild relatives from different Genepools[J].Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. Volume 141. American Society for Horticultural Science; 2016; pp. 34–44, 1.
Afful NT, Nyadanu D, Akromah R, et al. Evaluation of crossability studies between selected eggplant accessions with wild relatives S. Torvum, S. Anguivi and S. Aethopicum (Shum group)[J]. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2018;10(1):1–12.
doi: 10.5897/JPBCS2017.0695
Ranil RHG, Prohens J, Aubriot X, et al. Solanum Insanum L. (Subgenus Leptostemonum bitter, Solanaceae), the neglected wild progenitor of eggplant (S. melongena L.): a review of taxonomy, characteristics and uses aimed at its enhancement for improved eggplant breeding[J]. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution; 2016.
Li X, Yang Y, Henry RJ, Rossetto M, Wang Y, Chen S. Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2015;90(1):157–66.
doi: 10.1111/brv.12104
pubmed: 24666563
Zhao Y, Yin J, Guo H, Zhang Y, Xiao W, Sun C, Wu J, Qu X, Yu J, Wang X, Xiao J. The complete chloroplast genome provides insight into the evolution and polymorphism of Panax ginseng. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:696.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00696
pubmed: 25642231
pmcid: 4294130
Shubin XH. Genetic diversity of NBS-LRR class disease-resistance gene analogs in cultivated and wild eggplants[. Volume 298. J].Plant Systematics and Evolution; 2012; 7.
Jin JJ, Yu WB, Yang JB, Song Y, dePamphilis CW, Yi TS, Li DZ. GetOrganelle: a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):241.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5
pubmed: 32912315
pmcid: 7488116
Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(20):3350–2.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383
pubmed: 26099265
pmcid: 4595904
Shi L, Chen H, Jiang M, Wang L, Wu X, Huang L, Liu C. CPGAVAS2, an integrated plastome sequence annotator and analyzer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47.
Lewis SE, Searle SM, Harris N, Gibson M, Lyer V, Richter J, Wiel C, Bayraktaroglu L, Birney E, Crosby MA, Kaminker JS, Matthews BB, Prochnik SE, Smithy CD, Tupy JL, Rubin GM, Misra S, Mungall CJ, Clamp ME. Apollo: a sequence annotation editor. Genome Biol. 2002;3(12).
Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Web Server issue):W686-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki366 . PMID: 15980563; PMCID: PMC1160127.
Mazumdar P, Binti Othman R, Mebus K, Ramakrishnan N, Ann Harikrishna J. Codon usage and codon pair patterns in non-grass monocot genomes. Ann Bot. 2017;120(6):893–909.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx112
pubmed: 29155926
pmcid: 5710610
Beier S, Thiel T, Münch T, Scholz U, Mascher M. MISA-web: a web server for microsatellite prediction. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(16):2583–5.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198
pubmed: 28398459
pmcid: 5870701
Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(22):4633–42.
doi: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633
pubmed: 11713313
pmcid: 92531
Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. IRscope: an online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):3030–1.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220
pubmed: 29659705
Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 2019;20(4):1160–6.
doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108
pubmed: 28968734
Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34(12):3299–302.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx248
pubmed: 29029172
Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jul 1.
Dong Z, Fangluan G, Ivan J et al. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies.[J]. Molecular ecology resources,2020,20(1).
Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):564–77.
doi: 10.1080/10635150701472164
pubmed: 17654362
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O et al. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era (vol 37, pg 1530, 2020)[J].Molecular biology and evolution, 2020(8):37.
Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(8):1969–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075 . Epub 2012 Feb 25. PMID: 22367748; PMCID: PMC3408070.
doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss075
pubmed: 22367748
pmcid: 3408070
Silva DB, A D E,Venancio R B D, Felix TP et al. Phylogenetic Grouping and Levels of Genetic Structuration in SARS-Cov-2,using FIGTREE V1.4.4 Software[J]. Biol Systems: Open Access 2021,10(5):1–3.
Liu, Hai-Ying et al. The Chloroplast Genome of Lilium henrici: Genome Structure and Comparative Analysis. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 23.6(2018).
Jian H, Zhang Y, Yan H et al. The complete chloroplast genome of a key ancestor of Modern roses, Rosa chinensis var. Spontanea, and a comparison with Congeneric Species[J]. Molecules,2018,23(2).
Danchun Z, Jiajun T, Xiaoxia D et al. Analysis of the chloroplast genome and phylogenetic evolution of Bidens pilosa.[J]. BMC genomics,2023,24(1).
Dan Z, Zhensheng Q, Jintao Z et al. Chloroplast genome sequence of triploid Toxicodendron vernicifluum and comparative analyses with other lacquer chloroplast genomes.[J]. BMC genomics,2023,24(1).
Lu G, Xiaoxia D, Wan G et al. Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification[J]. BMC Plant Biology,2022,22(1).
Hyeon P, Jin KS, Yoon DH et al. Identifying SSR markers related to seed fatty acid content in Perilla Crop (Perilla frutescens L.)[J]. Plants,2021,10(7).
Gehendra B, Ainong S, R D K et al. Genome-wide simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers discovered from whole-genome sequence comparisons of multiple spinach accessions.[J]. Scientific reports,2021,11(1).
Xiaxia L, Lijun Q, Birong C et al. SSR markers development and their application in genetic diversity evaluation of garlic (Allium sativum) germplasm[J]. Plant Diversity,2022,44(5).
Mengying Y, Yanan Y, Yaju G et al. The complete chloroplast genome of;Solanum sisymbriifolium;(Solanaceae), the wild eggplant[J]. Mitochondrial DNA Part B,2022,7(5).
Ho TP. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of;Solanum hjertingii;, one of the wild potato relatives[J]. Mitochondrial DNA Part B,2022,7(4).
Birky CW Jr. Uniparental inheritance of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes: mechanisms and evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(25):11331–8.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11331
pubmed: 8524780
pmcid: 40394
Yi JP, Shuang X Z,Gui DZ, Newly reported chloroplast genome of Sinosenecio albonervius Y., Liu et al. & Q. E. Yang and comparative analyses with other Sinosenecio species[J]. BMC Genomics,2022,23(1).
Kan Y, Juan R, Songming B et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Eupatorium fortunei: Genome Organization and comparison with related Species[J]. Genes,2022,14(1).
Boelens R. C O G.Structure and function of bacterial initiation factors.[J]. Volume 3. Current Protein & Peptide Science; 2002. 1.
Hagg P, Pohl JWD, Abdulkarim F, et al. A host/plasmid system that is not dependent on antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes for stable plasmid maintenance in Escherichia coli. [J] J Biotechnol. 2004;111(1):17–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.010
pubmed: 15196766
Millen RS, Olmstead RG, Adams KL, Palmer JD, Lao NT, Heggie L, Kavanagh TA, Hibberd JM, Gray JC, Morden CW, Calie PJ, Jermiin LS, Wolfe KH. Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus. Plant Cell. 2001;13(3):645–58.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.3.645
pubmed: 11251102
pmcid: 135507
Huang C, Liu D, Li ZA et al. The PPR protein RARE1-mediated editing of chloroplast accD transcripts is required for fatty acid biosynthesis and heat tolerance in Arabidopsis[J], 2023.
Yaqi L, Xiang H, Mingkun X et al. An analysis of codon utilization patterns in the chloroplast genomes of three species of Coffea[J]. BMC Genomic Data,2023,24(1).
Gong L, Ding X, Guan W, Zhang D, Zhang J, Bai J, Xu W, Huang J, Qiu X, Zheng X, Zhang D, Li S, Huang Z, Su H. Comparative chloroplast genome analyses of Amomum: insights into evolutionary history and species identification. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):520.
doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03898-x
pubmed: 36352400
pmcid: 9644571
Song Y, Zhao W, Xu J, Li M, Zhang Y. Chloroplast Genome Evolution and species Identification of Styrax (Styracaceae). Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5364094.
doi: 10.1155/2022/5364094
pubmed: 35252450
pmcid: 8893999
Zhou J, Chen X, Cui Y, Sun W, Li Y, Wang Y, Song J, Yao H. Molecular structure and Phylogenetic Analyses of Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Two Aristolochia Medicinal Species. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9):1839.
doi: 10.3390/ijms18091839
pubmed: 28837061
pmcid: 5618488
Wang S, Gao J, Chao H, Li Z, Pu W, Wang Y, Chen M. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Nicotiana Species (Solanaceae): insights into the genetic variation, phylogenetic relationship, and Polyploid Speciation. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:899252.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.899252
pubmed: 35865282
pmcid: 9295722
Xu X, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Li Q, Wang W, Chen L, Chen G, Ng WL, Islam MN, Punnarak P, Zheng H, Zhu X. A comparison of 25 complete chloroplast genomes between sister mangrove species Kandelia obovata and Kandelia Candel geographically separated by the South China Sea. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1075353.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1075353
pubmed: 36684775
pmcid: 9845719
Xiong Y, Xiong Y, Shu X, Yu Q, Lei X, Li D, Yan J, Bai S, Ma X. Molecular phylogeography and Intraspecific Divergences in siberian wildrye (Elymus sibiricus L.) wild populations in China, inferred from chloroplast DNA sequence and cpSSR markers. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:862759.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.862759
pubmed: 35665183
pmcid: 9161273
Wang X, Bai S, Zhang Z, Zheng F, Song L, Wen L, Guo M, Cheng G, Yao W, Gao Y, Li J. Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes of 29 tomato germplasms: genome structures, phylogenetic relationships, and adaptive evolution. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1179009.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1179009
pubmed: 37229122
pmcid: 10203424
Yang Q, Li Y, Cai L, Gan G, Wang P, Li W, Li W, Jiang Y, Li D, Wang M, Xiong C, Chen R, Wang Y, Characteristics. Comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships of Chloroplast genomes of cultivars and Wild relatives of eggplant (Solanum melongena). Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(4):2832–46.
doi: 10.3390/cimb45040185
pubmed: 37185709
pmcid: 10136506
Shen X, Wu M, Liao B, Liu Z, Bai R, Xiao S, Li X, Zhang B, Xu J, Chen S. Complete chloroplast genome sequence and phylogenetic analysis of the Medicinal Plant Artemisia annua. Molecules. 2017;22(8):1330.
doi: 10.3390/molecules22081330
pubmed: 28800082
pmcid: 6152406
Morton BR, Bi IV, McMullen MD, Gaut BS. Variation in mutation dynamics across the maize genome as a function of regional and flanking base composition. Genetics. 2006;172(1):569–77.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049916
pubmed: 16219784
pmcid: 1456184