Molecular characterization of PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR family in Rosaceae and function of PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b in flowering regulation.
Circadian clock
Flowering time
Functional analysis
Gene expression
PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR
Pear
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Aug 2024
22 Aug 2024
Historique:
received:
10
03
2024
accepted:
16
08
2024
medline:
22
8
2024
pubmed:
22
8
2024
entrez:
21
8
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR) genes are essential components of circadian clock, playing vital roles in multiple processes including plant growth, flowering and stress response. Nonetheless, little is known about the evolution and function of PRR family in Rosaceae species. In this study, a total of 43 PRR genes in seven Rosaceae species were identified through comprehensive analysis. The evolutionary relationships were analyzed with phylogenetic tree, duplication events and synteny. PRR genes were classified into three groups (PRR1, PRR5/9, PRR3/7). The expansion of PRR family was mainly derived from dispersed and whole-genome duplication events. Purifying selection was the major force for PRR family evolution. Synteny analysis indicated the existence of multiple orthologous PRR gene pairs between pear and other Rosaceae species. Moreover, the conserved motifs of eight PbPRR proteins supported the phylogenetic relationship. PRR genes showed diverse expression pattern in various tissues of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Transcript analysis under 12-h light/ dark cycle and constant light conditions revealed that PRR genes exhibited distinct rhythmic oscillations in pear. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b highly homologous to AtPRR5 and AtPRR9 were cloned for further functional verification. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b proteins were localized in the nucleus. The ectopic overexpression of PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b significantly delayed flowering in Arabidopsis transgenic plants by repress the expression of AtGI, AtCO and AtFT under long-day conditions. These results provide information for exploring the evolution of PRR genes in plants, and contribute to the subsequent functional studies of PRR genes in pear and other Rosaceae species.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR) genes are essential components of circadian clock, playing vital roles in multiple processes including plant growth, flowering and stress response. Nonetheless, little is known about the evolution and function of PRR family in Rosaceae species.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this study, a total of 43 PRR genes in seven Rosaceae species were identified through comprehensive analysis. The evolutionary relationships were analyzed with phylogenetic tree, duplication events and synteny. PRR genes were classified into three groups (PRR1, PRR5/9, PRR3/7). The expansion of PRR family was mainly derived from dispersed and whole-genome duplication events. Purifying selection was the major force for PRR family evolution. Synteny analysis indicated the existence of multiple orthologous PRR gene pairs between pear and other Rosaceae species. Moreover, the conserved motifs of eight PbPRR proteins supported the phylogenetic relationship. PRR genes showed diverse expression pattern in various tissues of pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Transcript analysis under 12-h light/ dark cycle and constant light conditions revealed that PRR genes exhibited distinct rhythmic oscillations in pear. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b highly homologous to AtPRR5 and AtPRR9 were cloned for further functional verification. PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b proteins were localized in the nucleus. The ectopic overexpression of PbPRR59a and PbPRR59b significantly delayed flowering in Arabidopsis transgenic plants by repress the expression of AtGI, AtCO and AtFT under long-day conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These results provide information for exploring the evolution of PRR genes in plants, and contribute to the subsequent functional studies of PRR genes in pear and other Rosaceae species.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39169310
doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10720-5
pii: 10.1186/s12864-024-10720-5
doi:
Substances chimiques
Plant Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
794Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Xu X, Yuan L, Yang X, Zhang X, Wang L, Xie Q. Circadian clock in plants: Linking timing to fitness. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64(4):792–811.
pubmed: 35088570
doi: 10.1111/jipb.13230
Sanchez SE, Kay SA. The plant circadian clock: From a simple timekeeper to a complex developmental manager. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(12): a027748.
pubmed: 27663772
pmcid: 5131769
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a027748
Xu X, Yuan L, Xie Q. The circadian clock ticks in plant stress responses. Stress Biol. 2022;2(1):15.
pubmed: 37676516
pmcid: 10441891
doi: 10.1007/s44154-022-00040-7
Muroya M, Oshima H, Kobayashi S, Miura A, Miyamura Y, Shiota H, et al. Circadian Clock in Arabidopsis thaliana Determines Flower Opening Time Early in the Morning and Dominantly Closes Early in the Afternoon. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021;62(5):883–93.
pubmed: 33822207
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab048
Song YH, Shim JS, Kinmonth-Schultz HA, Imaizumi T. Photoperiodic flowering: time measurement mechanisms in leaves. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:441–64.
pubmed: 25534513
doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-115555
Dodd AN, Kusakina J, Hall A, Gould PD, Hanaoka M. The circadian regulation of photosynthesis. Photosynth Res. 2014;119(1–2):181–90.
pubmed: 23529849
doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9811-8
Nusinow DA, Helfer A, Hamilton EE, King JJ, Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, et al. The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature. 2011;475(7356):398–402.
pubmed: 21753751
pmcid: 3155984
doi: 10.1038/nature10182
Hotta CT, Gardner MJ, Hubbard KE, Baek SJ, Dalchau N, Suhita D, et al. Modulation of environmental responses of plants by circadian clocks. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(3):333–49.
pubmed: 17263778
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01627.x
Nohales MA, Kay SA. Molecular mechanisms at the core of the plant circadian oscillator. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(12):1061–9.
pubmed: 27922614
pmcid: 7750160
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3327
Steed G, Ramirez DC, Hannah MA, Webb AAR. Chronoculture, harnessing the circadian clock to improve crop yield and sustainability. Science. 2021;372(6541):eabc9141.
pubmed: 33926926
doi: 10.1126/science.abc9141
Bendix C, Marshall CM, Harmon FG. Circadian Clock Genes Universally Control Key Agricultural Traits. Mol Plant. 2015;8(8):1135–52.
pubmed: 25772379
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.003
Millar A, Carre I, Strayer C, Chua N, Kay S. Circadian clock mutants in Arabidopsis identified by luciferase imaging. Science. 1995;267(5201):1161–3.
pubmed: 7855595
doi: 10.1126/science.7855595
Alabadi D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Mas P, Kay SA. Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science. 2001;293(5531):880–3.
pubmed: 11486091
doi: 10.1126/science.1061320
Para A, Farre EM, Imaizumi T, Pruneda-Paz JL, Harmon FG, Kay SA. PRR3 Is a vascular regulator of TOC1 stability in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2007;19(11):3462–73.
pubmed: 18055606
pmcid: 2174887
doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.054775
Nakamichi N, Kita M, Ito S, Sato E, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. The Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators, PRR5 and PRR7, coordinately play essential roles for circadian clock function. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005;46(4):609–19.
pubmed: 15695441
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pci061
Farre EM, Harmer SL, Harmon FG, Yanovsky MJ, Kay SA. Overlapping and distinct roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Curr Biol. 2005;15(1):47–54.
pubmed: 15649364
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.067
Matsushika A, Makino S, Kojima M, Mizuno T. Circadian waves of expression of the APRR1/TOC1 family of pseudo-response regulators in Arabidopsis thaliana: insight into the plant circadian clock. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000;41(9):1002–12.
pubmed: 11100772
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcd043
Liu T, Carlsson J, Takeuchi T, Newton L, Farre EM. Direct regulation of abiotic responses by the Arabidopsis circadian clock component PRR7. Plant J. 2013;76(1):101–14.
pubmed: 23808423
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12276
Nakamichi N, Kusano M, Fukushima A, Kita M, Ito S, Yamashino T, et al. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50(3):447–62.
pubmed: 19131357
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp004
Fukushima A, Kusano M, Nakamichi N, Kobayashi M, Hayashi N, Sakakibara H, et al. Impact of clock-associated Arabidopsis pseudo-response regulators in metabolic coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(17):7251–6.
pubmed: 19359492
pmcid: 2667372
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900952106
Nakamichi N, Kita M, Niinuma K, Ito S, Yamashino T, Mizoguchi T, et al. Arabidopsis clock-associated pseudo-response regulators PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5 coordinately and positively regulate flowering time through the canonical CONSTANS-dependent photoperiodic pathway. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48(6):822–32.
pubmed: 17504813
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm056
Shim JS, Kubota A, Imaizumi T. Circadian Clock and Photoperiodic Flowering in Arabidopsis: CONSTANS Is a Hub for Signal Integration. Plant Physiol. 2017;173(1):5–15.
pubmed: 27688622
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01327
Hayama R, Sarid-Krebs L, Richter R, Fernandez V, Jang S, Coupland G. PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATORs stabilize CONSTANS protein to promote flowering in response to day length. EMBO J. 2017;36(7):904–18.
pubmed: 28270524
pmcid: 5376961
doi: 10.15252/embj.201693907
Hotta CT. The evolution and function of the PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR gene family in the plant circadian clock. Genet Mol Biol. 2022;45: e20220137.
pubmed: 36125163
pmcid: 9486492
doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2022-0137
Farre EM, Liu T. The PRR family of transcriptional regulators reflects the complexity and evolution of plant circadian clocks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(5):621–9.
pubmed: 23856081
doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.015
Murakami M, Matsushika A, Ashikari M, Yamashino T, Mizuno T. Circadian-associated rice pseudo response regulators (OsPRRs): insight into the control of flowering time. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005;69(2):410–4.
pubmed: 15725670
doi: 10.1271/bbb.69.410
Wang C, Wang L, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Dong K. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of PRR Gene Family and their Diurnal Rhythmic Expression Profile in Maize. Int J Genomics. 2022;2022:6941607.
pubmed: 35615408
pmcid: 9126661
doi: 10.1155/2022/6941607
Errum A, Rehman N, Khan MR, Ali GM. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of pseudo-response regulator gene family in wheat. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(3):2411–27.
pubmed: 33782785
doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06276-2
Wang J, Du Z, Huo X, Zhou J, Chen Y, Zhang J, et al. Genome-wide analysis of PRR gene family uncovers their roles in circadian rhythmic changes and response to drought stress in Gossypium hirsutum L. PeerJ. 2020;8: e9936.
pubmed: 33033660
pmcid: 7521341
doi: 10.7717/peerj.9936
Wang P, Wang L, Zhang L, Wu T, Sun B, Zhang J, et al. Genomic Dissection and Diurnal Expression Analysis Reveal the Essential Roles of the PRR Gene Family in Geographical Adaptation of Soybean. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(17):9970.
pubmed: 36077363
pmcid: 9456279
doi: 10.3390/ijms23179970
Jalal A, Sun J, Chen Y, Fan C, Liu J, Wang C. Evolutionary Analysis and Functional Identification of Clock-Associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRRs) Genes in the Flowering Regulation of Roses. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(13):7335.
pubmed: 35806340
pmcid: 9266954
doi: 10.3390/ijms23137335
Wang S, Zhang C, Zhao J, Li R, Lv J. Expression analysis of four pseudo-response regulator (PRR) genes in Chrysanthemum morifolium under different photoperiods. PeerJ. 2019;7: e6420.
pubmed: 30809439
pmcid: 6385685
doi: 10.7717/peerj.6420
Dally N, Xiao K, Holtgrawe D, Jung C. The B2 flowering time locus of beet encodes a zinc finger transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(28):10365–70.
pubmed: 24965366
pmcid: 4104907
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404829111
Pin PA, Zhang W, Vogt SH, Dally N, Büttner B, Schulze-Buxloh G, et al. The role of a pseudo-response regulator gene in life cycle adaptation and domestication of beet. Curr Biol. 2012;22(12):1095–101.
pubmed: 22608508
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.007
Lu S, Dong L, Fang C, Liu S, Kong L, Cheng Q, et al. Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication. Nat Genet. 2020;52(4):428–36.
pubmed: 32231277
doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0604-7
Li C, Li YH, Li Y, Lu H, Hong H, Tian Y, et al. A domestication-associated gene GmPRR3b regulates the circadian clock and flowering time in soybean. Mol Plant. 2020;13(5):745–59.
pubmed: 32017998
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.014
Koo BH, Yoo SC, Park JW, Kwon CT, Lee BD, An G, et al. Natural variation in OsPRR37 regulates heading date and contributes to rice cultivation at a wide range of latitudes. Mol Plant. 2013;6(6):1877–88.
pubmed: 23713079
doi: 10.1093/mp/sst088
Murphy RL, Klein RR, Morishige DT, Brady JA, Rooney WL, Miller FR, et al. Coincident light and clock regulation of pseudoresponse regulator protein 37 (PRR37) controls photoperiodic flowering in sorghum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(39):16469–74.
pubmed: 21930910
pmcid: 3182727
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106212108
Campoli CSM, Davis SJ, von Korff M. Expression conservation within the circadian clock of a monocot: natural variation at barley Ppd-H1 affects circadian expression of flowering time genes, but not clock orthologs. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:97.
pubmed: 22720803
pmcid: 3478166
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-97
Panchy N, Lehti-Shiu M, Shiu SH. Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016;171(4):2294–316.
pubmed: 27288366
pmcid: 4972278
doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00523
Qiao X, Li Q, Yin H, Qi K, Li L, Wang R, et al. Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization-diploidization cycles in plants. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):38.
pubmed: 30791939
pmcid: 6383267
doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1650-2
Qiao X, Yin H, Li L, Wang R, Wu J, Wu J, et al. Different modes of gene duplication show divergent evolutionary patterns and contribute differently to the expansion of gene families involved in important fruit traits in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri). Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:161.
pubmed: 29487610
pmcid: 5816897
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00161
Blanc G, Wolfe KH. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell. 2004;16(7):1667–78.
pubmed: 15208399
pmcid: 514152
doi: 10.1105/tpc.021345
Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, Zhu S, et al. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Res. 2013;23(2):396–408.
pubmed: 23149293
pmcid: 3561880
doi: 10.1101/gr.144311.112
Wang Y, Tang H, Debarry JD, Tan X, Li J, Wang X, et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(7): e49.
pubmed: 22217600
pmcid: 3326336
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293
Kaczorowski KA, Quail PH. Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 Is a signaling intermediate in phytochrome-regulated seedling deetiolation and phasing of the circadian clock. Plant Cell. 2003;15(11):2654–65.
pubmed: 14563930
pmcid: 280569
doi: 10.1105/tpc.015065
Liu H, Zhou X, Li Q, Wang L, Xing Y. CCT domain-containing genes in cereal crops: flowering time and beyond. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133(5):1385–96.
pubmed: 32006055
doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03554-8
Li Y, Yu S, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Liu M, Zhang A, et al. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the CCT Gene Family in Foxtail Millet (Setaria italica) Response to Diurnal Rhythm and Abiotic Stress. Genes (Basel). 2022;13(10):1829.
pubmed: 36292714
doi: 10.3390/genes13101829
Linde AM, Eklund DM, Kubota A, Pederson ERA, Holm K, Gyllenstrand N, et al. Early evolution of the land plant circadian clock. New Phytol. 2017;216(2):576–90.
pubmed: 28244104
pmcid: 5638080
doi: 10.1111/nph.14487
Johansson M, Ibanez C, Takata N, Eriksson ME. The perennial clock is an essential timer for seasonal growth events and cold hardiness. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1158:297–311.
pubmed: 24792060
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0700-7_20
Satbhai SB, Yamashino T, Okada R, Nomoto Y, Mizuno T, Tezuka Y, et al. Pseudo-response regulator (PRR) homologues of the moss Physcomitrella patens: insights into the evolution of the PRR family in land plants. DNA Res. 2011;18(1):39–52.
pubmed: 21186242
doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsq033
Harmer SL. The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2009;60:357–77.
pubmed: 19575587
doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092054
Creux N, Harmer S. Circadian Rhythms in Plants. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(9): a034611.
pubmed: 31138544
pmcid: 6719598
doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034611
Liu Z, Liu W, Wang Z, Qi K, Xie Z, Zhang S, et al. Diurnal transcriptome dynamics reveal the photoperiod response of Pyrus. Physiol Plant. 2023;175(2): e13893.
pubmed: 36929905
doi: 10.1111/ppl.13893
Wei H, Wang X, He Y, Xu H, Wang L. Clock component OsPRR73 positively regulates rice salt tolerance by modulating OsHKT2;1-mediated sodium homeostasis. EMBO J. 2021;40(3): e105086.
pubmed: 33347628
doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105086
Li N, Zhang Y, He Y, Wang Y, Wang L. Pseudo Response Regulators Regulate Photoperiodic Hypocotyl Growth by Repressing PIF4/5 Transcription. Plant Physiol. 2020;183(2):686–99.
pubmed: 32165445
pmcid: 7271792
doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01599
Nakamichi N, Takao S, Kudo T, Kiba T, Wang Y, Kinoshita T, et al. Improvement of Arabidopsis Biomass and Cold, Drought and Salinity Stress Tolerance by Modified Circadian Clock-Associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORs. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57(5):1085–97.
pubmed: 27012548
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw057
Turner A, Beales J, Faure S, Dunford RP, Laurie DA. The pseudo-response regulator Ppd-H1 provides adaptation to photoperiod in barley. Science. 2005;310(5750):1031–4.
pubmed: 16284181
doi: 10.1126/science.1117619
Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape JW, Laurie DA. A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2007;15(5):721–33.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0603-4
Nakamichi N, Kudo T, Makita N, Kiba T, Kinoshita T, Sakakibara H. Flowering time control in rice by introducing Arabidopsis clock-associated PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 5. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020;84(5):970–9.
pubmed: 31985350
doi: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1719822
Zhang Q, Chen W, Sun L, Zhao F, Huang B, Yang W, et al. The genome of Prunus mume. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1318.
pubmed: 23271652
doi: 10.1038/ncomms2290
Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.
pubmed: 32585190
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.
pubmed: 27004904
pmcid: 8210823
doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293–6.
pubmed: 33885785
pmcid: 8265157
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301
Wang D, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Zhu J, Yu J. KaKs_Calculator 2.0: a toolkit incorporating gamma-series methods and sliding window strategies. Genom Proteom Bioinf. 2010;8(1):77–80.
doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(10)60008-3
Lee TH, Tang H, Wang X, Paterson AH. PGDD: a database of gene and genome duplication in plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D1152-1158.
pubmed: 23180799
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):59–60.
pubmed: 25402007
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176
Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W369-373.
pubmed: 16845028
pmcid: 1538909
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl198
Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1296–7.
pubmed: 25504850
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817
Wang P, Li Y, Liu Z, Li X, Wang Y, Liu W, et al. Reciprocal regulation of flower induction by ELF3alpha and ELF3beta generated via alternative promoter usage. Plant Cell. 2023;35(6):2095–113.
pubmed: 36883592
pmcid: 10226570
doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad067
Liu Z, Zhu X, Liu W, Qi K, Xie Z, Zhang S, et al. Characterization of the REVEILLE family in Rosaceae and role of PbLHY in flowering time regulation. BMC Genomics. 2023;24(1):49.
pubmed: 36707756
pmcid: 9883883
doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09144-4
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55(4):611–22.
pubmed: 19246619
doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797
Xie Q, Wang P, Liu X, Yuan L, Wang L, Zhang C, et al. LNK1 and LNK2 are transcriptional coactivators in the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator. Plant Cell. 2014;26(7):2843–57.
pubmed: 25012192
pmcid: 4145118
doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.126573
Sparkes IA, Runions J, Kearns A, Hawes C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(4):2019–25.
pubmed: 17487191
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.286
Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.
pubmed: 10069079
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x