First insight into the genomes of the Pulmonaria officinalis group (Boraginaceae) provided by repeatome analysis and comparative karyotyping.
Pulmonaria
Comparative karyotyping
Genome size
Repeatome
Satellite DNA
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Sep 2024
13 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
22
03
2024
accepted:
07
08
2024
medline:
13
9
2024
pubmed:
13
9
2024
entrez:
12
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The genus Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae) represents a taxonomically complex group of species in which morphological similarity contrasts with striking karyological variation. The presence of different numbers of chromosomes in the diploid state suggests multiple hybridization/polyploidization events followed by chromosome rearrangements (dysploidy). Unfortunately, the phylogenetic relationships and evolution of the genome, have not yet been elucidated. Our study focused on the P. officinalis group, the most widespread species complex, which includes two morphologically similar species that differ in chromosome number, i.e. P. obscura (2n = 14) and P. officinalis (2n = 16). Ornamental cultivars, morphologically similar to P. officinalis (garden escapes), whose origin is unclear, were also studied. Here, we present a pilot study on genome size and repeatome dynamics of these closely related species in order to gain new information on their genome and chromosome structure. Flow cytometry confirmed a significant difference in genome size between P. obscura and P. officinalis, corresponding to the number of chromosomes. Genome-wide repeatome analysis performed on genome skimming data showed that retrotransposons were the most abundant repeat type, with a higher proportion of Ty3/Gypsy elements, mainly represented by the Tekay lineage. Comparative analysis revealed no species-specific retrotransposons or striking differences in their copy number between the species. A new set of chromosome-specific cytogenetic markers, represented by satellite DNAs, showed that the chromosome structure in P. officinalis was more variable compared to that of P. obscura. Comparative karyotyping supported the hybrid origin of putative hybrids with 2n = 15 collected from a mixed population of both species and outlined the origin of ornamental garden escapes, presumably derived from the P. officinalis complex. Large-scale genome size analysis and repeatome characterization of the two morphologically similar species of the P. officinalis group improved our knowledge of the genome dynamics and differences in the karyotype structure. A new set of chromosome-specific cytogenetic landmarks was identified and used to reveal the origin of putative hybrids and ornamental cultivars morphologically similar to P. officinalis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The genus Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae) represents a taxonomically complex group of species in which morphological similarity contrasts with striking karyological variation. The presence of different numbers of chromosomes in the diploid state suggests multiple hybridization/polyploidization events followed by chromosome rearrangements (dysploidy). Unfortunately, the phylogenetic relationships and evolution of the genome, have not yet been elucidated. Our study focused on the P. officinalis group, the most widespread species complex, which includes two morphologically similar species that differ in chromosome number, i.e. P. obscura (2n = 14) and P. officinalis (2n = 16). Ornamental cultivars, morphologically similar to P. officinalis (garden escapes), whose origin is unclear, were also studied. Here, we present a pilot study on genome size and repeatome dynamics of these closely related species in order to gain new information on their genome and chromosome structure.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Flow cytometry confirmed a significant difference in genome size between P. obscura and P. officinalis, corresponding to the number of chromosomes. Genome-wide repeatome analysis performed on genome skimming data showed that retrotransposons were the most abundant repeat type, with a higher proportion of Ty3/Gypsy elements, mainly represented by the Tekay lineage. Comparative analysis revealed no species-specific retrotransposons or striking differences in their copy number between the species. A new set of chromosome-specific cytogenetic markers, represented by satellite DNAs, showed that the chromosome structure in P. officinalis was more variable compared to that of P. obscura. Comparative karyotyping supported the hybrid origin of putative hybrids with 2n = 15 collected from a mixed population of both species and outlined the origin of ornamental garden escapes, presumably derived from the P. officinalis complex.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Large-scale genome size analysis and repeatome characterization of the two morphologically similar species of the P. officinalis group improved our knowledge of the genome dynamics and differences in the karyotype structure. A new set of chromosome-specific cytogenetic landmarks was identified and used to reveal the origin of putative hybrids and ornamental cultivars morphologically similar to P. officinalis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39266954
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05497-4
pii: 10.1186/s12870-024-05497-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
859Subventions
Organisme : Palacký University, Olomouc
ID : IGA PrF-2024-001
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Chacón J, Luebert F, Hilger HH, Ovchinnikova S, Selvi F, Cecchi L, et al. The borage family (Boraginaceae s.s.): a revised infrafamilial classification based on new phylogenetic evidence, with emphasis on the placement of some enigmatic genera. Taxon. 2016;65(3):523–46. https://doi.org/10.12705/653.6 .
doi: 10.12705/653.6
Merxmüller H, Grau J. Dysploidie Bei Pulmonaria. Rev Roum Biol-Botanique. 1969;14(1):57–63.
Sauer W. Karyo-Systematische Untersuchungen an Der Gattung Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae). Chromosomen-Zahlen, Karyotyp-Analysen und allgemeine Hinweise Auf die Entwicklungsgeschichte. Bibliot Bot. 1975;131:1–85.
Sauer W. A phylogenetic model for North-Eurasiatic Tubifloras on the base of comparative morphology, zytogenetics and ecology. Acta Bot Yunnanica. 1986;8(4):383–95.
Májovský J, Murín A. Cytotaxonomy of the genus Pulmonaria L. in Slovakia. Bol Soc Brot Ser 2. 1980;53:25–739.
Bolliger M. Die Gattung Pulmonaria in Westeuropa. Liechtenstein, Vaduz: J. Cramer; 1982.
Sauer W. The Pulmonaria dacica group: its affinities with central and south-east European allies and with the genus paraskeria (Boraginaceae). PIant Syst Evol. 1987;55:257–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00936303 .
doi: 10.1007/BF00936303
Ge-ling Z, Riedl H, Kamelin R. Boraginaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, eds. Flora of China, Vol. 16: Gentianaceae through Boraginaceae. China, Beijing: Science Press and USA, St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press; 1995. pp. 329–427.
Baasanmunkh S, Oyuntsetseg B, Tsegmed Z, Oyundelger K, Urgamal M, Gantuya B, et al. Distribution of vascular plants in Mongolia – I Part. Mong J Biol Sci. 2022;20(1):3–28. https://doi.org/10.22353/mjbs.2022.20.01 .
doi: 10.22353/mjbs.2022.20.01
Liu L, Astuti G, Coppi A, Peruzzi L. Different chromosome numbers but slight morphological differentiation and genetic admixture among populations of the Pulmonaria hirta complex (Boraginaceae). Taxon. 2022;71(5):1025–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12721 .
doi: 10.1002/tax.12721
Kirchner D. Molekulare Phylogenie und Biogeographie Der Gattung Pulmonaria L. (Boraginaceae). Germany, Aachen: Verlag Mainz; 2004.
Şuteu D, Băcilă I, Coldea G. Detection of barcode markers able to differentiate the endemic taxon Pulmonaria Filarzskyana Jáv. From Pulmonaria Rubra Schott. Contrib Bot. 2016;51:7–16.
Meeus S, Janssens S, Helsen K, Jacquemyn H. Evolutionary trends in the distylous genus Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae): evidence of ancient hybridization and current interspecific gene flow. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016;98:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.022 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.11.022
pubmed: 26732490
Grünig S, Fischer M. Recent hybrid speciation at the origin of the narrow endemic Pulmonaria helvetica. Ann Bot. 2021;127(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa145 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa145
pubmed: 32738145
Bennett M. Pulmonarias and the borage family. UK, London: BT Batsford; 2003.
Bolliger M. Die Pulmonaria Obscura-Officinalis-Gruppe in Der Schweiz. Ber Schweiz Bot Ges. 1978;88(1/2):30–62.
Dersch G. Über Pulmonaria officinalis L., Pulmonaria obscura Dum. Und ihren Bastard in Nordhessen Und Südniedersachsen. Hessische Floristische Briefe. 1994;43:49–63.
Pellicer J, Hidalgo O, Dodsworth S, Leitch IJ. Genome size diversity and its impact on the evolution of land plants. Genes. 2018;9:88. soltis10.3390/genes9020088.
doi: 10.3390/genes9020088
pubmed: 29443885
pmcid: 5852584
Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Plant genomes: markers of evolutionary history and drivers of evolutionary change. Plants People Planet. 2021;3(1):74–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10159 .
doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10159
Wendel JF. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42(1):225–49. Doi:.
doi: 10.1023/A:1006392424384
pubmed: 10688139
Ibarra-Laclette E, Lyons E, Hernández-Guzmán G, Pérez-Torres CA, Carretero-Paulet L, Chang T-H, et al. Architecture and evolution of a minute plant genome. Nature. 2013;498:94–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12132 .
doi: 10.1038/nature12132
pubmed: 23665961
pmcid: 4972453
Macas J, Novák P, Pellicer J, Čížková J, Koblížková A, Neumann P, et al. In depth characterization of repetitive DNA in 23 plant genomes reveals sources of genome size variation in the legume tribe Fabeae. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0143424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143424 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143424
pubmed: 26606051
pmcid: 4659654
Leitch IJ, Bennet MD. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc. 2004;82(4):651–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00349.x
Bennetzen JL, Ma J, Devos KM. Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 2005;95:127–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci008 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mci008
pubmed: 15596462
pmcid: 4246713
Renny-Byfield S, Kovarik A, Kelly LJ, Macas J, Novak P, Chase MW, et al. Diploidization and genome size change in allopolyploids is associated with differential dynamics of low- and high-copy sequences. Plant J. 2013;74(5):829–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12168 .
doi: 10.1111/tpj.12168
pubmed: 23517128
Zenil-Ferguson R, Ponciano JM, Burleigh JG. Evaluating the role of genome downsizing and size thresholds from genome size distributions in angiosperms. Am J Bot. 2016;103(7):1175–86. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500408 .
doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500408
pubmed: 27206462
Simonin KA, Roddy AB. Genome downsizing, physiological novelty, and the global dominance of flowering plants. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(1):e2003706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003706
pubmed: 29324757
pmcid: 5764239
Wang X, Morto JA, Pellicer J, Leitch IJ, Leitch AR. Genome downsizing after polyploidy: mechanisms, rates and selection pressures. Plant J. 2021;107:1003–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15363 .
doi: 10.1111/tpj.15363
pubmed: 34077584
Chase MW, Samuel R, Leitch AR, Guignard MS, Conran JG, Nollet F, et al. Down, then up: non-parallel genome size changes and a descending chromosome series in a recent radiation of the Australian allotetraploid plant species, Nicotiana section suaveolentes (Solanaceae). Ann Bot. 2023;131(1):123–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac006 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac006
pubmed: 35029647
Weigend M, Selvi F, Thomas DC, Hilger HH. Boraginaceae. In: Kadereit JW, Bittrich V, editors. The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol. 14. Flowering plants. Eudicots. Aquifoliales, Boraginales, Bruniales, Dipsacales, Escalloniales, Garryales, Paracryphiales, Solanales (except Convolvulaceae), Icacinaceae, Metteniusaceae, Vahliaceae. China, Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 41–102.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28534-4_5
Kobrlová L, Hroneš M. First insights into the evolution of genome size in the borage family–complete data set of Boraginaceae in the Czech Republic. Bot J Linn Soc. 2019;189(2):115–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/botlinnean/boy079 .
doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boy079
Selvi F, Coppi A, Bigazzi M. Karyotype variation, evolution and phylogeny in Borago (Boraginaceae), with emphasis on subgenus buglossites in the Corso-Sardinian system. Ann Bot. 2006;98:857–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl167 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl167
pubmed: 16870641
pmcid: 2806164
Bigazzi M, Selvi F. Karyotype morphology and cytogeography in Brunnera and Cynoglottis (Boraginaceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 2001;136(4):365–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb00580.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2001.tb00580.x
Bigazzi M, Selvi F. Chromosome variation in Anatolian species of Nonea Medik. (Boraginaceae), with special reference to endemics and N. persica. Caryologia. 2003;56(4):509–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2003.10589364 .
doi: 10.1080/00087114.2003.10589364
Kobrlová L, Hroneš M, Koutecký P, Štech M, Trávníček B. Symphytum tuberosum complex in central Europe: cytogeography, morphology, ecology and taxonomy. Preslia. 2016;88:77–112.
Kobrlová L, Duchoslav M, Hroneš M. Morphological, ecological and geographic differences between diploids and tetraploids of Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae) justify both cytotypes as separate species. AoB Plants. 2022;144:plac028. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac028 .
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plac028
Kolarčik V, Kocová V, Cakovic´ D, Kačmárová T, Piovár J, Mártonfi P. Nuclear genome size variation in the allopolyploid Onosma Arenaria – O. pseudoarenaria species group: methodological issues and revised data. Botany. 2018;96:397–410. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2017-0164 .
doi: 10.1139/cjb-2017-0164
Merxmüller H, Sauer W. Pulmonaria L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea. Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;: UK; 1972. pp. 100–2.
Hultén E, Fries M. Atlas of North European vascular plants north of the Tropic of Cancer. Germany, Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books; 1986.
Sauer W, Gruber G. Beitrag Zur Kenntnis Der Gattung Pulmonaria in Bayern: Kritische Sippen, Verbreitung und allgemeine Hinweise Auf die Arealbildung. Bayerische Bot Gesellschaft Zur Erforschung Der Heimischen Flora. 1979;50:127–60.
Hroneš M, Kobrlová L. 12. Pulmonaria L. In: Kaplan Z, Danihelka J, Chrtek J Jr, Kirschner J, Kubát K, Štech M eds. Key to the Flora of the Czech Republic. Ed.2. CZ, Praha: Academia; 2019. pp. 815–816.
Vejvodová K, Kúr P, Koutecký P, Diewald W, Grulich V, Máchalová K, et al. Distribution and identification of Pulmonaria officinalis and P. obscura in the Bohemian Forest and its adjacent foothills. Silva Gabreta. 2021;27:97–119.
Astuti G, Cristofolini G, Peruzzi L, Pupillo P. A new subspecies of Pulmonaria officinalis (Boraginaceae) from the southern Alps. Phytotaxa. 2014;186(3):148–57. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.186.3.3 .
doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.186.3.3
Cecchi L, Selvi F. Synopsis of Boraginaceae subfam. Boraginoideae tribe Boragineae in Italy. Plant Biosyst. 2015;149(4):630–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2015.1057261 .
doi: 10.1080/11263504.2015.1057261
POWO. Plants of the World Online Kew (UK): The Royal Botanic Gardens. 2024. http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/ . Accessed 3 March 2024.
Scott P. Physiology and behaviour of plants. UK. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2008.
Meeus S, Brys R, Honnay O, Jacquemyn H. Biological Flora of the British Isles: Pulmonaria officinalis. J Ecol. 2013;101(5):1353–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12150 .
doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12150
Puppi G, Cristofolini G. Sul Significato Del Binomio Pulmonaria saccharata Miller. Webbia. 1991;45(2):221–34.
doi: 10.1080/00837792.1991.10670497
Puppi G, Cristofolini G. Systematics of the complex Pulmonaria saccharata, Pulmonaria vallarsae and related species (Boraginaceae). Webbia. 1996;51(1):1–20.
doi: 10.1080/00837792.1996.10670611
Novák P, Ávila Robledillo L, Koblížková A, Vrbová I, Neumann P, Macas J. TAREAN: a computational tool for identification and characterization of satellite DNA from unassembled short reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(12):e111. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx257 .
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx257
pubmed: 28402514
pmcid: 5499541
Koprivý L, Fráková V, Kolarčik V, Mártonfiová L, Dudáš M, Mártonfi P. Genome size and endoreplication in two pairs of cytogenetically contrasting species of Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae) in Central Europe. AoB PLANTS. 2022;14(5):plac036. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plac036 .
doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plac036
pubmed: 36128515
pmcid: 9476981
Leitch IJ, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD. Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (Embryophyta). Ann Bot. 2005;95(1):207–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci014 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mci014
pubmed: 15596468
pmcid: 4246719
Hawkins JS, Proulx SR, Rapp RA, Wendel JF. Rapid DNA loss as a counterbalance to genome expansion through retrotransposon proliferation in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(42):17811–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904339106 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0904339106
pubmed: 19815511
pmcid: 2764891
Leitch IJ, Chase MW, Bennett MD. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA C-values provides evidence for a small ancestral genome size in flowering plants. Ann Bot. 1998;82:85–94.
doi: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0783
Šmarda P, Knápek O, Březinová A, Horová L, Grulich V, Danihelka J, et al. Genome sizes and genomic guanine + cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. Preslia. 2019;91(2):117–42. https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2019.117 .
doi: 10.23855/preslia.2019.117
Piednoel M, Aberer AJ, Schneeweiss GM, Macas J, Novak P, Gundlach H, et al. Next-generation sequencing reveals the impact of repetitive DNA across phylogenetically closely related genomes of Orobanchaceae. Mol Biol Evol. 2012;29(11):3601–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss168 .
doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss168
pubmed: 22723303
Novák P, Hřibová E, Neumann P, Koblížková A, Doležel J, Macas J. Genome-wide analysis of repeat diversity across the family Musaceae. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e98918. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098918 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098918
pubmed: 24932725
pmcid: 4059648
McCann J, Macas J, Novák P, Stuessy TF, Villasenor JL, Weiss-Schneweiss H. Differential genome size and repetitive DNA evolution in diploid species of Melampodium sect. Melampodium (Asteraceae). Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11:362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00362 .
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00362
Zwyrtková J, Němečková A, Čížková J, Holušová K, Kapustová V, Svačina R, et al. Comparative analyses of DNA repeats and identification of a novel Fesreba centromeric element in fescues and ryegrasses. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02495-0 .
doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02495-0
pubmed: 32552738
pmcid: 7302162
Ferraz ME, Ribeiro T, Sader M, Nascimento T, Pedrosa-Harand A. Comparative analysis of repetitive DNA in dysploid and non-dysploid Phaseolus beans. Chromosome Res. 2023;31(4):30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10577-023-09739-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s10577-023-09739-3
pubmed: 37812264
International Rice Genome Sequencing Project, Sasaki T. The map-based sequence of the rice genome. Nature. 2005;436(7052):793–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03895 .
doi: 10.1038/nature03895
Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science. 2009;326(5956):1112–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1178534 .
doi: 10.1126/science.1178534
pubmed: 19965430
Papon N, Lasserre-Zuber P, Rimbert H, De Oliveira R, Paux E, Choulet F. All families of transposable elements were active in the recent wheat genome evolution and polyploidy had no impact on their activity. Plant Genome. 2023;16(3):e20347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20347 .
doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20347
pubmed: 37243411
Kreplak J, Madoui MA, Cápal P, Novák P, Labadie K, Aubert G, et al. A reference genome for pea provides insight into legume genome evolution. Nat Genet. 2019;51:1411–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0480-1 .
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0480-1
pubmed: 31477930
Kim S, Park M, Yeom SI, Kim YM, Lee JM, Lee AH, et al. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat Genet. 2014;46:270–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2877 .
doi: 10.1038/ng.2877
pubmed: 24441736
Sierro N, Battey J, Ouadi S, Bakaher N, Bovet L, Willig A, et al. The tobacco genome sequence and its comparison with those of tomato and potato. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3833. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4833 .
doi: 10.1038/ncomms4833
pubmed: 24807620
Dodsworth S, Jang TS, Struebig M, Chase MW, Weiss-Schneweiss H, Leitch AR. Genome-wide repeat dynamics reflect phylogenetic distance in closely related allotetraploid Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Plant Syst Evol. 2017;303:1013–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1356-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00606-016-1356-9
pubmed: 32009724
Gaiero P, Vaio M, Peters SA, Schranz ME, de Jong H, Speranza PR. Comparative analysis of repetitive sequences among species from the potato and the tomato clades. Ann Bot. 2019;123(3):521–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy186 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy186
pubmed: 30346473
Song B, Song Y, Fu Y, Kizito EB, Kamenya SN, Kabod PN, et al. Draft genome sequence of Solanum aethiopicum provides insights into disease resistance, drought tolerance, and the evolution of the genome. Gigascience. 2019;8(10):giz115. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz115 .
doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz115
pubmed: 31574156
pmcid: 6771550
Li N, He Q, Wang J, Wang B, Zhao J, Huang S, et al. Super-pangenome analyses highlight genomic diversity and structural variation across wild and cultivated tomato species. Nat Genet. 2023;55:852–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01340-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01340-y
pubmed: 37024581
pmcid: 10181942
Song Z, Lin C, Xing P, Fen Y, Jin H, Zhou C, et al. A high-quality reference genome sequence of Salvia miltiorrhiza provides insights into tanshinone synthesis in its red rhizomes. Plant Genome. 2020;13(3):e20041. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20041 .
doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20041
pubmed: 33217202
Jia KH, Liu H, Zhang RG, Xu J, Zhou S-S, Jiao S-Q, et al. Chromosome-scale assembly and evolution of the tetraploid Salvia splendens (Lamiaceae) genome. Hortic Res. 2021;8:177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00614-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00614-y
pubmed: 34465761
pmcid: 8408255
Muravenko OV, Yurkevich OY, Kalnyuk JV, Samatadze TE, Zoshchuk SA, Amosova AV. Integration of repeatomic and Cytogenetic Data on Satellite DNA for the Genome Analysis in the Genus Salvia (Lamiaceae). Plants. 2022;11(17):2244. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172244 .
doi: 10.3390/plants11172244
pubmed: 36079625
pmcid: 9460151
Gams H, Pulmonaria L. In: Hegi G, editor. Illustrierte Flora Von Mitteleuropa. Volume V/3. Germany, München: J.F. Lehmanns; 1927. pp. 2209–21.
Meusel H, Jäger EJ, Rauschert S, Weinert E. Vergleichende Chorologie Der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Band II. Germany, Jena: Gustav Fischer; 1978.
Garcia S, Wendel JF, Borowska-Zuchowska N, Aïnouche M, Kuderova A, Kovarik A. The utility of graph clustering of 5S ribosomal DNA homoeologs in plant allopolyploids, homoploid hybrids, and cryptic introgressants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:41. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00041 .
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00041
pubmed: 32117380
pmcid: 7025596
Vozárová R, Herklotz V, Kovařík A, Tynkevich YO, Volkov RA, Ritz CM, et al. Ancient origin of two 5S rDNA families dominating in the genus Rosa and their behavior in the Canina-type meiosis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:643548. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.643548 .
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.643548
pubmed: 33763100
pmcid: 7984461
Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák M, Bennett MD. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘Genome size’ and ‘C-Value’ to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot. 2005;95(1):255–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci019 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mci019
pubmed: 15596473
pmcid: 4246724
Šmarda P, Bureš P, Horová L, Foggi B, Rossi G. Genome size and GC content evolution of Festuca: ancestral expansion and subsequent reduction. Ann Bot. 2008;101(3):421–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm307 .
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm307
pubmed: 18158307
Doležel J, Greilhuber J, Lucretti S, Meister A, Lysák MA, Nardi L, et al. Plant genome size estimation by flow cytometry: inter-laboratory comparison. Ann Bot. 1998;82(Supplement A):17–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312 .
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010312
Barow M, Meister A. Lack of correlation between AT frequency and genome size in higher plants and the effect of nonrandomness of base sequences on dye binding. Cytometry A. 2002;47(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.10030 .
doi: 10.1002/cyto.10030
Doležel J, Bartoš J, Voglmayr H, Greilhuber J. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A. 2003;51(2):127–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10013 . author reply 129.
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.10013
pubmed: 12541287
Hintze J. NCSS 9.0.15. 2013. https://www.ncss.com/
Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
pubmed: 30423086
pmcid: 6129281
Novák P, Neumann P, Macas J. Global analysis of repetitive DNA from unassembled sequence reads using RepeatExplorer2. Nat Protoc. 2020;15(11):3745–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0400-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0400-y
pubmed: 33097925
Novák P, Neumann P, Pech J, Steinhaisl J, Macas J. RepeatExplorer: a Galaxy-based web server for genome-wide characterization of eukaryotic repetitive elements from next-generation sequence reads. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(6):792–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt054 .
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt054
pubmed: 23376349
Neumann P, Novák P, Hoštáková N, Macas J. Systematic survey of plant LTR-retrotransposons elucidates phylogenetic relationships of their polyprotein domains and provides a reference for element classification. Mob DNA. 2019;10:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13100-018-0144-1 .
doi: 10.1186/s13100-018-0144-1
pubmed: 30622655
pmcid: 6317226
Sonnhammer EL, Durbin R. A dot-matrix program with dynamic threshold control suited for genomic DNA and protein sequence analysis. Gene. 1995;167(1–2):GC1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8 .
doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00714-8
pubmed: 8566757
Kapustová V, Tulpová Z, Toegelová H, Novák P, Macas J, Karafiátová M, et al. The dark matter of large cereal genomes: long tandem repeats. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(10):2483. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102483 .
doi: 10.3390/ijms20102483
pubmed: 31137466
pmcid: 6567227
Šimoníková D, Němečková A, Čížková J, Brown A, Swennen R, Doležel J, et al. Chromosome painting in cultivated bananas and their wild relatives (Musa spp.) reveals differences in chromosome structure. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7915. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21217915 .
doi: 10.3390/ijms21217915
pubmed: 33114462
pmcid: 7672600
Kato A, Lamb JC, Birchler JA. Chromosome painting using repetitive DNA sequences as probes for somatic chromosome identification in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(37):13554–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403659101 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403659101
pubmed: 15342909
pmcid: 518793
Kato A, Albert PS, Vega JM, Birchler JA. Sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization signal detection in maize using directly labeled probes produced by high concentration DNA polymerase nick translation. Biotech Histochem. 2006;81(2–3):71–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10520290600643677 .
doi: 10.1080/10520290600643677
pubmed: 16908431
Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks596 .
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596
pubmed: 22730293
pmcid: 3424584
Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR. Cloning and characterization of ribosomal-RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7(7):1869–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/7.7.1869 .
doi: 10.1093/nar/7.7.1869
pubmed: 537913
pmcid: 342353