Revertant mosaic fibroblasts in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Journal
The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
accepted:
25
03
2019
pubmed:
30
3
2019
medline:
16
3
2021
entrez:
30
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Revertant mosaicism has been described previously in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), manifesting as regions of skin with normal mechanical and biological characteristics. Here we report the discovery of revertant dermal fibroblasts, unique in that all other documented cases of revertant mosaicism occur in epidermal keratinocytes. To determine the cause of revertant mosaicism found in a patient with RDEB from isolated epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts in blister and mosaic skin regions. Skin biopsies were taken from blister and mosaic skin regions of a patient with RDEB. Allele identification was confirmed and the type VII collagen (C7) content and COL7A1 expression profile of isolated keratinocytes and fibroblasts was determined. Keratinocytes isolated from the mosaic area had a slight increase in C7, although overall expression of COL7A1 was unchanged between blister and mosaic fibroblasts. Differential allele expression was identified in blister and mosaic fibroblasts using targeted RNA sequencing (TREx), where the allele harbouring a point mutation was preferentially expressed over that containing a frameshift mutation. A crossing over event was identified in mosaic fibroblasts that was not present in blister fibroblasts, yielding a functional COL7A1 allele in a subset of cells. In documenting a novel case of revertant mosaicism in RDEB, we have identified dermal fibroblasts as having the capacity to correct blistering functionally. We have also pioneered the use of TREx in quantifying allele-specific expression. Using fibroblasts instead of keratinocytes for RDEB therapies offers advantages in the local and systemic therapy of RDEB. What's already known about this topic? Revertant mosaicism has been previously documented in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), however, it has only been found in epidermal keratinocytes. What does this study add? We have demonstrated that COL7A1 gene reversion in dermal fibroblasts occurs and is able to form functional skin in a patient with RDEB. Additionally, we have pioneered a new application for targeted RNA sequencing in quantifying allele-specific expression in fibroblasts and keratinocytes. What is the translational message? This opens up possibilities for using fibroblasts as local and systemic therapy for patients with RDEB.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Revertant mosaicism has been described previously in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), manifesting as regions of skin with normal mechanical and biological characteristics. Here we report the discovery of revertant dermal fibroblasts, unique in that all other documented cases of revertant mosaicism occur in epidermal keratinocytes.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the cause of revertant mosaicism found in a patient with RDEB from isolated epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts in blister and mosaic skin regions.
METHODS
Skin biopsies were taken from blister and mosaic skin regions of a patient with RDEB. Allele identification was confirmed and the type VII collagen (C7) content and COL7A1 expression profile of isolated keratinocytes and fibroblasts was determined.
RESULTS
Keratinocytes isolated from the mosaic area had a slight increase in C7, although overall expression of COL7A1 was unchanged between blister and mosaic fibroblasts. Differential allele expression was identified in blister and mosaic fibroblasts using targeted RNA sequencing (TREx), where the allele harbouring a point mutation was preferentially expressed over that containing a frameshift mutation. A crossing over event was identified in mosaic fibroblasts that was not present in blister fibroblasts, yielding a functional COL7A1 allele in a subset of cells.
CONCLUSIONS
In documenting a novel case of revertant mosaicism in RDEB, we have identified dermal fibroblasts as having the capacity to correct blistering functionally. We have also pioneered the use of TREx in quantifying allele-specific expression. Using fibroblasts instead of keratinocytes for RDEB therapies offers advantages in the local and systemic therapy of RDEB. What's already known about this topic? Revertant mosaicism has been previously documented in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), however, it has only been found in epidermal keratinocytes. What does this study add? We have demonstrated that COL7A1 gene reversion in dermal fibroblasts occurs and is able to form functional skin in a patient with RDEB. Additionally, we have pioneered a new application for targeted RNA sequencing in quantifying allele-specific expression in fibroblasts and keratinocytes. What is the translational message? This opens up possibilities for using fibroblasts as local and systemic therapy for patients with RDEB.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30924923
doi: 10.1111/bjd.17943
pmc: PMC6766431
mid: NIHMS1020592
doi:
Substances chimiques
COL7A1 protein, human
0
Collagen Type VII
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1247-1253Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR063070
Pays : United States
Organisme : Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota
Pays : International
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 British Association of Dermatologists.
Références
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
J Clin Invest. 2008 May;118(5):1669-79
pubmed: 18382769
Nat Med. 2014 Aug;20(8):847-56
pubmed: 25100530
JCI Insight. 2018 Mar 22;3(6):
pubmed: 29563344
Annu Rev Genet. 2017 Nov 27;51:123-141
pubmed: 29178821
Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1999 May-Jun;111(3):198-205
pubmed: 10354359
Methods Cell Biol. 2018;143:1-39
pubmed: 29310772
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Oct;130(10):2407-11
pubmed: 20574443
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192994
pubmed: 29470523
J Invest Dermatol. 2004 Jan;122(1):73-7
pubmed: 14962092
J Invest Dermatol. 2014 May;134(5):1246-1254
pubmed: 24317394
Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Feb;170A(2):452-459
pubmed: 26494396
Bioinformatics. 2010 Jul 15;26(14):1783-5
pubmed: 20562416
J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Nov;121(5):1021-8
pubmed: 14708601
Clin Immunol. 2010 Apr;135(1):72-83
pubmed: 20123155
Br J Haematol. 2006 Mar;132(5):630-5
pubmed: 16445838
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 16;360(16):1680-2
pubmed: 19369679
Cell. 1997 Feb 21;88(4):543-51
pubmed: 9038345
Hautarzt. 2014 Jun;65(6):536-41
pubmed: 24898508
J Clin Invest. 2003 Jan;111(2):251-5
pubmed: 12531881
Trends Mol Med. 2011 Mar;17(3):140-8
pubmed: 21195026
J Invest Dermatol. 2010 Jul;130(7):1937-40
pubmed: 20357813
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2018 Mar;7(2):
pubmed: 29244903
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017 Jun;74(12):2229-2238
pubmed: 28168442
Immunol Res. 2009;44(1-3):127-31
pubmed: 19129986
Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Mar 15;26(6):1070-1077
pubmed: 28158657