Patterns of conservation of spliceosomal intron structures and spliceosome divergence in representatives of the diplomonad and parabasalid lineages.
5' Untranslated Regions
/ genetics
Base Pairing
/ genetics
Base Sequence
Conserved Sequence
Diplomonadida
/ genetics
Genome
Introns
/ genetics
Nucleic Acid Conformation
Parabasalidea
/ genetics
Phylogeny
RNA Splicing
/ genetics
RNA, Messenger
/ genetics
RNA, Small Nuclear
/ chemistry
Ribosomal Proteins
/ genetics
Spliceosomes
/ genetics
Ancient intron
Diplomonad
Intron evolution
Ribosomal protein
Small nuclear RNA
Spironucleus
Spliceosomal intron
Spliceosomal protein
Journal
BMC evolutionary biology
ISSN: 1471-2148
Titre abrégé: BMC Evol Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 08 2019
02 08 2019
Historique:
received:
11
01
2019
accepted:
23
07
2019
entrez:
4
8
2019
pubmed:
4
8
2019
medline:
12
10
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Two spliceosomal intron types co-exist in eukaryotic precursor mRNAs and are excised by distinct U2-dependent and U12-dependent spliceosomes. In the diplomonad Giardia lamblia, small nuclear (sn) RNAs show hybrid characteristics of U2- and U12-dependent spliceosomal snRNAs and 5 of 11 identified remaining spliceosomal introns are trans-spliced. It is unknown whether unusual intron and spliceosome features are conserved in other diplomonads. We have identified spliceosomal introns, snRNAs and proteins from two additional diplomonads for which genome information is currently available, Spironucleus vortens and Spironucleus salmonicida, as well as relatives, including 6 verified cis-spliceosomal introns in S. vortens. Intron splicing signals are mostly conserved between the Spironucleus species and G. lamblia. Similar to 'long' G. lamblia introns, RNA secondary structural potential is evident for 'long' (> 50 nt) Spironucleus introns as well as introns identified in the parabasalid Trichomonas vaginalis. Base pairing within these introns is predicted to constrain spatial distances between splice junctions to similar distances seen in the shorter and uniformly-sized introns in these organisms. We find that several remaining Spironucleus spliceosomal introns are ancient. We identified a candidate U2 snRNA from S. vortens, and U2 and U5 snRNAs in S. salmonicida; cumulatively, illustrating significant snRNA differences within some diplomonads. Finally, we studied spliceosomal protein complements and find protein sets in Giardia, Spironucleus and Trepomonas sp. PC1 highly- reduced but well conserved across the clade, with between 44 and 62 out of 174 studied spliceosomal proteins detectable. Comparison with more distant relatives revealed a highly nested pattern, with the more intron-rich fornicate Kipferlia bialata retaining 87 total proteins including nearly all those observed in the diplomonad representatives, and the oxymonad Monocercomonoides retaining 115 total proteins including nearly all those observed in K. bialata. Comparisons in diplomonad representatives and species of other closely-related metamonad groups indicates similar patterns of intron structural conservation and spliceosomal protein composition but significant divergence of snRNA structure in genomically-reduced species. Relative to other eukaryotes, loss of evolutionarily-conserved snRNA domains and common sets of spliceosomal proteins point to a more streamlined splicing mechanism, where intron sequences and structures may be functionally compensating for the minimalization of spliceosome components.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Two spliceosomal intron types co-exist in eukaryotic precursor mRNAs and are excised by distinct U2-dependent and U12-dependent spliceosomes. In the diplomonad Giardia lamblia, small nuclear (sn) RNAs show hybrid characteristics of U2- and U12-dependent spliceosomal snRNAs and 5 of 11 identified remaining spliceosomal introns are trans-spliced. It is unknown whether unusual intron and spliceosome features are conserved in other diplomonads.
RESULTS
We have identified spliceosomal introns, snRNAs and proteins from two additional diplomonads for which genome information is currently available, Spironucleus vortens and Spironucleus salmonicida, as well as relatives, including 6 verified cis-spliceosomal introns in S. vortens. Intron splicing signals are mostly conserved between the Spironucleus species and G. lamblia. Similar to 'long' G. lamblia introns, RNA secondary structural potential is evident for 'long' (> 50 nt) Spironucleus introns as well as introns identified in the parabasalid Trichomonas vaginalis. Base pairing within these introns is predicted to constrain spatial distances between splice junctions to similar distances seen in the shorter and uniformly-sized introns in these organisms. We find that several remaining Spironucleus spliceosomal introns are ancient. We identified a candidate U2 snRNA from S. vortens, and U2 and U5 snRNAs in S. salmonicida; cumulatively, illustrating significant snRNA differences within some diplomonads. Finally, we studied spliceosomal protein complements and find protein sets in Giardia, Spironucleus and Trepomonas sp. PC1 highly- reduced but well conserved across the clade, with between 44 and 62 out of 174 studied spliceosomal proteins detectable. Comparison with more distant relatives revealed a highly nested pattern, with the more intron-rich fornicate Kipferlia bialata retaining 87 total proteins including nearly all those observed in the diplomonad representatives, and the oxymonad Monocercomonoides retaining 115 total proteins including nearly all those observed in K. bialata.
CONCLUSIONS
Comparisons in diplomonad representatives and species of other closely-related metamonad groups indicates similar patterns of intron structural conservation and spliceosomal protein composition but significant divergence of snRNA structure in genomically-reduced species. Relative to other eukaryotes, loss of evolutionarily-conserved snRNA domains and common sets of spliceosomal proteins point to a more streamlined splicing mechanism, where intron sequences and structures may be functionally compensating for the minimalization of spliceosome components.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31375061
doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1488-y
pii: 10.1186/s12862-019-1488-y
pmc: PMC6679479
doi:
Substances chimiques
5' Untranslated Regions
0
RNA, Messenger
0
RNA, Small Nuclear
0
Ribosomal Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
162Références
RNA. 1999 Feb;5(2):221-34
pubmed: 10024174
Nature. 2001 Feb 15;409(6822):860-921
pubmed: 11237011
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):3701-5
pubmed: 11854456
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 15;31(4):1121-35
pubmed: 12582231
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3406-15
pubmed: 12824337
Mol Cell. 2003 Jul;12(1):5-14
pubmed: 12887888
Curr Biol. 2003 Sep 2;13(17):1512-7
pubmed: 12956953
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D168-70
pubmed: 14681386
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Dec;4(12):960-70
pubmed: 14685174
Genome Biol. 2004;5(12):R102
pubmed: 15575968
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1053-66
pubmed: 15659557
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 22;102(12):4430-5
pubmed: 15764705
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Mar 23;33(6):1741-8
pubmed: 15788746
EMBO J. 2005 Sep 7;24(17):3057-69
pubmed: 16096647
BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Aug 18;5:45
pubmed: 16109161
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 20;103(25):9566-71
pubmed: 16760254
BMC Genomics. 2006 Oct 11;7:256
pubmed: 17034638
Nature. 2006 Oct 19;443(7113):863-6
pubmed: 17051219
Cell. 1992 Feb 21;68(4):743-54
pubmed: 1739979
Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1921-6
pubmed: 17901334
Nucleic Acids Res. 2008 May;36(9):3001-10
pubmed: 18390578
Cell. 2009 Feb 20;136(4):701-18
pubmed: 19239890
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Mar;5(3):e1000315
pubmed: 19282982
Mol Cell. 2009 Nov 25;36(4):593-608
pubmed: 19941820
BMC Genomics. 2010 Feb 11;11:106
pubmed: 20149226
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Sep;27(9):1979-82
pubmed: 20360213
BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Aug 18;11:431
pubmed: 20718988
J Biol Chem. 2011 Mar 4;286(9):7116-22
pubmed: 21209094
Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 22;21(4):311-5
pubmed: 21315596
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Jul 01;3(7):null
pubmed: 21441581
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jan;29(1):43-9
pubmed: 21482665
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002150
pubmed: 21935348
RNA. 2012 Apr;18(4):673-83
pubmed: 22328579
Mol Cell. 2012 Feb 24;45(4):567-80
pubmed: 22365833
Front Plant Sci. 2012 Jan 26;3:9
pubmed: 22639636
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Nov;40(21):10995-1008
pubmed: 23019220
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D226-32
pubmed: 23125362
Bioinformatics. 2013 Nov 15;29(22):2933-5
pubmed: 24008419
PLoS Genet. 2014 Feb 06;10(2):e1004053
pubmed: 24516394
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 May 01;6(5):a016147
pubmed: 24789819
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):E1191-200
pubmed: 25733880
Nat Methods. 2015 Apr;12(4):357-60
pubmed: 25751142
RNA Biol. 2015;12(11):1-8
pubmed: 26400738
PeerJ. 2017 Jan 5;5:e2861
pubmed: 28090405
RNA. 2017 Jun;23(6):952-967
pubmed: 28325844
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
pubmed: 9254694
Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Sep;14(9):895-901
pubmed: 9287422
Trends Genet. 1997 Dec;13(12):497-8
pubmed: 9433140