Inter-laboratory study on standardized MPS libraries: evaluation of performance, concordance, and sensitivity using mixtures and degraded DNA.
Alleles
Austria
DNA Fingerprinting
/ methods
Electrophoresis, Capillary
Female
France
Gene Library
Germany
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Humans
Laboratories
Male
Microsatellite Repeats
Netherlands
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Sweden
Collaborative study
ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit
Inter-laboratory study
Massively parallel sequencing
Short tandem repeats
Journal
International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2020
Jan 2020
Historique:
received:
04
09
2019
accepted:
29
10
2019
pubmed:
21
11
2019
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
21
11
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We present results from an inter-laboratory massively parallel sequencing (MPS) study in the framework of the SeqForSTRs project to evaluate forensically relevant parameters, such as performance, concordance, and sensitivity, using a standardized sequencing library including reference material, mixtures, and ancient DNA samples. The standardized library was prepared using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit (primer mix A). The library was shared between eight European laboratories located in Austria, France, Germany, The Netherlands, and Sweden to perform MPS on their particular MiSeq FGx sequencers. Despite variation in performance between sequencing runs, all laboratories obtained quality metrics that fell within the manufacturer's recommended ranges. Furthermore, differences in locus coverage did not inevitably adversely affect heterozygous balance. Inter-laboratory concordance showed 100% concordant genotypes for the included autosomal and Y-STRs, and still, X-STR concordance exceeded 83%. The exclusive reasons for X-STR discordances were drop-outs at DXS10103. Sensitivity experiments demonstrated that correct allele calling varied between sequencing instruments in particular for lower DNA amounts (≤ 125 pg). The analysis of compromised DNA samples showed the drop-out of one sample (FA10013B01A) while for the remaining three degraded DNA samples MPS was able to successfully type ≥ 87% of all aSTRs, ≥ 78% of all Y-STRs, ≥ 68% of all X-STRs, and ≥ 92% of all iSNPs demonstrating that MPS is a promising tool for human identity testing, which in return, has to undergo rigorous in-house validation before it can be implemented into forensic routine casework.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31745634
doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02201-2
pii: 10.1007/s00414-019-02201-2
pmc: PMC6949318
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185-198Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
ID : IZ25-5793-2015-30 2017-2020
Organisme : Horizon 2020
ID : HOME/2014/ISFP/AG/LAWX/4000007135
Références
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:135-148
pubmed: 28938154
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:52-70
pubmed: 28171784
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Dec 1;29(23):4793-9
pubmed: 11726688
Electrophoresis. 1999 Jun;20(8):1682-96
pubmed: 10435432
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013 Dec;7(6):581-586
pubmed: 23941903
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:188-194
pubmed: 28279935
Electrophoresis. 2018 Nov;39(21):2708-2724
pubmed: 30101987
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):810-8
pubmed: 22503403
Electrophoresis. 2018 Nov;39(21):2685-2693
pubmed: 30025170
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jan;20:20-29
pubmed: 26433485
Electrophoresis. 2016 Oct;37(21):2841-2847
pubmed: 27489250
Int J Legal Med. 2008 Sep;122(5):435-40
pubmed: 18491122
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:106-115
pubmed: 30144646
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:182-191
pubmed: 30878722
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:134-44
pubmed: 26774099
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2007 Mar;1(1):29-34
pubmed: 19083725
Electrophoresis. 2017 Apr;38(8):1163-1174
pubmed: 28078776
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Jan;123(1):1-5
pubmed: 18604547
J Hum Evol. 2015 Feb;79:21-34
pubmed: 25601038
Electrophoresis. 2006 May;27(9):1713-24
pubmed: 16586411
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:77-85
pubmed: 29945120
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jul;132(4):983-995
pubmed: 28956146
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:111-120
pubmed: 27082757
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Sep;12:107-19
pubmed: 24908576
Anal Biochem. 2005 Feb 1;337(1):89-97
pubmed: 15649380
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Sep;36:95-103
pubmed: 29986231
Int J Legal Med. 2009 Nov;123(6):459-64
pubmed: 19089439
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:57-61
pubmed: 29413636
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Jan;132(1):13-24
pubmed: 28755253
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Nov;13:68-78
pubmed: 25082138
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2007 Sep;3(3):200-5
pubmed: 25869164
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Sep;24:86-96
pubmed: 27347657
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Nov;25:214-226
pubmed: 27697609
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:162-169
pubmed: 29486434
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Jan 24;108(1):1-29
pubmed: 10697775
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:81-94
pubmed: 30103146
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Nov;19:148-155
pubmed: 26226223
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Mar 19;10 Suppl 3:S5
pubmed: 19344481
Sci Justice. 2004 Jan-Mar;44(1):51-3
pubmed: 14964822
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Sep;30:81-92
pubmed: 28651097
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:54-63
pubmed: 26844919
Forensic Sci Int. 2006 Dec 1;164(1):20-32
pubmed: 16360294
Gene. 1999 Jul 8;234(2):177-86
pubmed: 10395891
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2015 Sep;18:118-30
pubmed: 26197946
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jan;133(1):51-58
pubmed: 30341454
Int J Legal Med. 2001;114(4-5):204-10
pubmed: 11355396
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013 Jul 01;5(7):
pubmed: 23729639
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Jan;131(1):73-86
pubmed: 27785563
Electrophoresis. 2018 Nov;39(21):2674-2684
pubmed: 30009409
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:15-21
pubmed: 26701720
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Jul;23:178-189
pubmed: 27208666
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13578-84
pubmed: 16938852
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014 Sep;12:69-76
pubmed: 24905335
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 May;28:1-9
pubmed: 28126691
Electrophoresis. 2017 Mar;38(6):846-854
pubmed: 27943350
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:21-25
pubmed: 29626805
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2017 Nov;31:126-134
pubmed: 28938153
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 10;9:428
pubmed: 18847484
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 11;104(37):14616-21
pubmed: 17715061
Croat Med J. 2015 Jun;56(3):218-29
pubmed: 26088846
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Sep;24:97-102
pubmed: 27352221