Systematic analysis reveals cis and trans determinants affecting C-to-U RNA editing in Arabidopsis thaliana.
Arabidopsis
C-to-U RNA editing
Cis
Regulatory
Synonyms“Missense” and “nonsynonymous”.
Trans
Journal
BMC genetics
ISSN: 1471-2156
Titre abrégé: BMC Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 09 2020
03 09 2020
Historique:
received:
13
06
2020
accepted:
26
08
2020
entrez:
5
9
2020
pubmed:
5
9
2020
medline:
7
4
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
C-to-U RNA editing is prevalent in the mitochondrial and chloroplast genes in plants. The biological functions of a fraction of C-to-U editing sites are continuously discovered by case studies. However, at genome-wide level, the cis and trans determinants affecting the occurrence or editing levels of these C-to-U events are relatively less studied. What is known is that the PPR (pentatricopeptide repeat) proteins are the main trans-regulatory elements responsible for the C-to-U conversion, but other determinants especially the cis-regulatory elements remain largely uninvestigated. By analyzing the transcriptome and translatome data in Arabidopsis thaliana roots and shoots, combined with RNA-seq data from hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata, we perform genome-wide investigation on the cis elements and trans-regulatory elements that potentially affect C-to-U editing events. An upstream guanosine or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) regions are unfavorable for editing events. Meanwhile, many genes including the transcription factors may indirectly play regulatory roles in trans. The 5-prime thymidine facilitates editing and dsRNA structures prevent editing in cis. Many transcription factors affect editing in trans. Although the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the cis and trans regulation remain to be experimentally verified, our findings provide novel aspects in studying the botanical C-to-U RNA editing events.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
C-to-U RNA editing is prevalent in the mitochondrial and chloroplast genes in plants. The biological functions of a fraction of C-to-U editing sites are continuously discovered by case studies. However, at genome-wide level, the cis and trans determinants affecting the occurrence or editing levels of these C-to-U events are relatively less studied. What is known is that the PPR (pentatricopeptide repeat) proteins are the main trans-regulatory elements responsible for the C-to-U conversion, but other determinants especially the cis-regulatory elements remain largely uninvestigated.
RESULTS
By analyzing the transcriptome and translatome data in Arabidopsis thaliana roots and shoots, combined with RNA-seq data from hybrids of Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata, we perform genome-wide investigation on the cis elements and trans-regulatory elements that potentially affect C-to-U editing events. An upstream guanosine or double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) regions are unfavorable for editing events. Meanwhile, many genes including the transcription factors may indirectly play regulatory roles in trans.
CONCLUSIONS
The 5-prime thymidine facilitates editing and dsRNA structures prevent editing in cis. Many transcription factors affect editing in trans. Although the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying the cis and trans regulation remain to be experimentally verified, our findings provide novel aspects in studying the botanical C-to-U RNA editing events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32883207
doi: 10.1186/s12863-020-00907-6
pii: 10.1186/s12863-020-00907-6
pmc: PMC7469343
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Plant
0
Transcription Factors
0
Uracil
56HH86ZVCT
Cytosine
8J337D1HZY
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
98Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 31770213
Pays : International
Références
BMC Genomics. 2008 Oct 02;9:454
pubmed: 18831738
Curr Genet. 2002 Apr;41(1):48-52
pubmed: 12073100
Genome Biol. 2012 Dec 28;13(12):252
pubmed: 23273215
J Plant Physiol. 2020 Jan;244:153081
pubmed: 31783167
Nat Methods. 2013 Feb;10(2):128-32
pubmed: 23291724
EMBO J. 1992 Mar;11(3):1099-103
pubmed: 1547774
Cell. 2014 Mar 13;156(6):1324-1335
pubmed: 24630730
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 15;29(14):1813-4
pubmed: 23742983
Plant Mol Biol. 2018 Jun;97(3):215-231
pubmed: 29761268
BMC Genomics. 2020 Apr 29;21(1):333
pubmed: 32349669
Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Mar 20;246(6):739-44
pubmed: 7898443
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 May 08;10:135
pubmed: 19422723
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Aug;33(8):2088-101
pubmed: 27189540
Plant J. 2014 Sep;79(5):797-809
pubmed: 24923534
Cell. 1987 Feb 27;48(4):607-13
pubmed: 2434241
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 May 6;:e13525
pubmed: 32374903
Cell. 2017 Apr 6;169(2):191-202.e11
pubmed: 28388405
J Plant Physiol. 2019 Sep;240:153012
pubmed: 31362206
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Apr 11;9:482
pubmed: 29696033
BMC Cancer. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):359
pubmed: 30991970
Mitochondrion. 2008 Jan;8(1):35-46
pubmed: 18326075
Plant J. 2010 Feb 1;61(3):456-66
pubmed: 19929879
Genome Biol. 2017 Oct 2;18(1):185
pubmed: 28969707
J Hered. 1999 May-Jun;90(3):338-44
pubmed: 10355119
Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Feb 12;30(3):253-60
pubmed: 22327324
Science. 2009 Apr 10;324(5924):218-23
pubmed: 19213877
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019 Apr;137:53-61
pubmed: 30738217
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D170-D174
pubmed: 30364952
Cell. 1993 Dec 31;75(7):1361-70
pubmed: 8269514
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1;31(13):3429-31
pubmed: 12824340
Nature. 2013 Dec 5;504(7478):168-71
pubmed: 24162847
Plant Cell. 2013 Mar;25(3):868-83
pubmed: 23463776
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jul 1;28(13):1805-6
pubmed: 22543366
Nat Methods. 2012 Mar 04;9(4):357-9
pubmed: 22388286
Plant Physiol. 2010 Feb;152(2):939-47
pubmed: 20018598
Nature. 2017 Oct 11;550(7675):249-254
pubmed: 29022589
Mol Biotechnol. 2018 Dec;60(12):935-945
pubmed: 30244436
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Aug 04;32(14):4137-44
pubmed: 15295040
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 8;113(45):E7126-E7135
pubmed: 27791167
Plant Direct. 2019 Sep 09;3(9):e00169
pubmed: 31517178
PLoS Genet. 2016 Jul 28;12(7):e1006191
pubmed: 27467689
J Biol Chem. 1995 Aug 4;270(31):18227-33
pubmed: 7629140
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Oct 14;19(1):422
pubmed: 31610786
PLoS Genet. 2017 Jul 26;13(7):e1006931
pubmed: 28746393
IUBMB Life. 2009 Dec;61(12):1101-4
pubmed: 19946897
Plant Cell. 1993 Dec;5(12):1843-1852
pubmed: 12271058
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Nov;71(21):4195-206
pubmed: 25038778
FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):64-71
pubmed: 8422976
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Plant J. 2015 Oct;84(2):283-95
pubmed: 26303363
Evol Bioinform Online. 2020 Apr 13;16:1176934320916794
pubmed: 32313422
FEBS Lett. 2010 Jan 21;584(2):252-64
pubmed: 19931533