Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals novel roles of transcription factors and hormones during the flowering induction and floral bud differentiation in sweet cherry trees (Prunus avium L. cv. Bing).


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 05 05 2019
accepted: 22 02 2020
entrez: 13 3 2020
pubmed: 13 3 2020
medline: 20 6 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In sweet cherry trees, flowering is commercially important because the flowers, after fertilization, will generate the fruits. In P. avium, the flowering induction and flower organogensis are the first developmental steps towards flower formation and they occur within specialized organs known as floral buds during the summer, nine months before blooming. During this period the number of floral buds per tree and the bud fruitfulness (number of flowers per bud) are stablished affecting the potential yield of orchards and the plant architecture. The floral bud development is sensitive to any type of stress and the hotter and drier summers will interfere with this process and are calling for new adapted cultivars. A better understanding of the underlying molecular and hormonal mechanisms would be of help, but unlike the model plant Arabidopsis, very little is known about floral induction in sweet cherry. To explore the molecular mechanism of floral bud differentiation, high-throughput RNA sequencing was used to detect differences in the gene expression of P. avium floral buds at five differentiation stages. We found 2,982 differentially expressed genes during floral bud development. We identified genes associated with floral initiation or floral organ identity that appear to be useful biomarkers of floral development and several transcription factor families (ERF, MYB, bHLH, MADS-box and NAC gene family) with novel potential roles during floral transition in this species. We analyzed in deep the MADS-box gene family and we shed light about their key role during floral bud and organs development in P. avium. Furthermore, the hormonal-related signatures in the gene regulatory networks and the dynamic changes of absicic acid, zeatin and indolacetic acid contents in buds suggest an important role for these hormones during floral bud differentiation in sweet cherry. These data provide a rich source of novel informacion for functional and evolutionary studies about floral bud development in sweet cherry and new tools for biotechnology and breeding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32163460
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230110
pii: PONE-D-19-12723
pmc: PMC7067470
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cytokinins 0
Indoleacetic Acids 0
Plant Proteins 0
Transcription Factors 0
Abscisic Acid 72S9A8J5GW

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0230110

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 10;9:1990
pubmed: 30687377
J Exp Bot. 2012 Sep;63(15):5397-404
pubmed: 22915743
Plant Physiol. 2009 Apr;149(4):1713-23
pubmed: 19211705
Science. 2008 Nov 14;322(5904):1113-6
pubmed: 19008449
EMBO J. 2000 Nov 15;19(22):6150-61
pubmed: 11080161
Bioinformatics. 2002 Jan;18(1):207-8
pubmed: 11836235
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 11;27(17):R887-R890
pubmed: 28898659
Mol Genet Genomics. 2014 Oct;289(5):903-20
pubmed: 24859011
Plant Reprod. 2016 Dec;29(4):311-322
pubmed: 27878597
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D200-D203
pubmed: 27899674
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jan 4;69(2):189-200
pubmed: 28992118
BMC Plant Biol. 2019 Mar 6;19(1):93
pubmed: 30841918
Plant Physiol. 2014 Jun 19;165(4):1591-1603
pubmed: 24948837
Cell. 1999 Nov 24;99(5):473-83
pubmed: 10589676
Plant J. 2011 Nov;68(4):597-606
pubmed: 21831209
Arabidopsis Book. 2013 Nov 01;11:e0166
pubmed: 24273463
DNA Res. 2017 Oct 1;24(5):499-508
pubmed: 28541388
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2013 Jul;19(3):307-21
pubmed: 24431500
Bioinformatics. 2009 Apr 15;25(8):1091-3
pubmed: 19237447
Tree Physiol. 2021 Apr 8;41(4):544-561
pubmed: 32975290
J Exp Bot. 2018 Mar 24;69(7):1447-1469
pubmed: 29474735
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Sep;13(9):627-39
pubmed: 22898651
J Exp Bot. 2013 Jan;64(2):675-84
pubmed: 23307919
Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1761:275-301
pubmed: 29525965
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 23;8(1):5090
pubmed: 29572446
Plant Cell Physiol. 2018 Feb 1;59(2):215-221
pubmed: 29361058
Development. 2018 Feb 27;145(4):
pubmed: 29487105
J Exp Bot. 2015 Sep;66(19):5997-6008
pubmed: 26139822
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Mar;110(5):959-68
pubmed: 15700145
Plant J. 2009 Oct;60(2):314-27
pubmed: 19566594
Trends Plant Sci. 2010 Oct;15(10):573-81
pubmed: 20674465
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Feb 07;15:41
pubmed: 25848674
Plants (Basel). 2014 Apr 30;3(2):251-65
pubmed: 27135503
J Plant Physiol. 2013 Feb 15;170(3):315-20
pubmed: 23206932
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(7):1979-89
pubmed: 19264752
Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 15;430(2):288-301
pubmed: 28351648
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015 Apr;32:121-129
pubmed: 25553537
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Mar 14;18(Suppl 3):80
pubmed: 28361673
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 20;10(11):e0143250
pubmed: 26587668
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Jun 12;6:443
pubmed: 26124770
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jul 11;5:334
pubmed: 25071812
J Exp Bot. 2014 Sep;65(17):4985-95
pubmed: 24948678
Plant Cell. 2003 Jul;15(7):1538-51
pubmed: 12837945
Plant Cell. 2006 Jun;18(6):1373-82
pubmed: 16679456
Genetics. 2009 Sep;183(1):325-35
pubmed: 19581446
J Exp Bot. 2016 Jan;67(1):195-205
pubmed: 26507894
Nat Protoc. 2013 Aug;8(8):1494-512
pubmed: 23845962
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015 Jun;25:53-62
pubmed: 25988582
Science. 2000 Jun 2;288(5471):1613-6
pubmed: 10834834
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W122-W129
pubmed: 28472432
J Exp Bot. 2016 Dec;67(22):6309-6322
pubmed: 27733440
Tree Physiol. 2018 May 1;38(5):755-771
pubmed: 29182786
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D1040-D1045
pubmed: 27924042
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1406-22
pubmed: 25353719
Plant J. 2011 Mar;65(6):972-9
pubmed: 21205031

Auteurs

Luis Villar (L)

Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Fruticultura (CEAF), Rengo, Chile.

Ixia Lienqueo (I)

Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Fruticultura (CEAF), Rengo, Chile.

Analía Llanes (A)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

Pamela Rojas (P)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) CRI Rayentué, Rengo, Chile.

Jorge Perez (J)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) CRI Rayentué, Rengo, Chile.

Francisco Correa (F)

Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Fruticultura (CEAF), Rengo, Chile.
Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) CRI Rayentué, Rengo, Chile.

Boris Sagredo (B)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) CRI Rayentué, Rengo, Chile.

Oscar Masciarelli (O)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

Virginia Luna (V)

Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiotecnológicas (INIAB-CONICET), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

Rubén Almada (R)

Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Fruticultura (CEAF), Rengo, Chile.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Animals Hemiptera Insect Proteins Phylogeny Insecticides
Amaryllidaceae Alkaloids Lycoris NADPH-Ferrihemoprotein Reductase Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Plant Proteins
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family

Classifications MeSH